If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
We sure did. I think he can run anchor in our 400 relay team. But, can he be productive on the football field? Because there was no comparison between the two in collage on the field.
His speed is the only attribute we can be sure of for now. Next weekend's rookie minicamp should give us a decent barometer of where he's starting from.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Goodwin is no Tavon Austin, but he could become a dangerous player with the players we have right now.
I like the fact that he started for the South team in the Senior Bowl, it means he's coachable and that was among the best in that event. I don't expect him lining up as a 1 or 2 WR but I see him contributing early on ST and some packages on offense.
Goodwin is no Tavon Austin, but he could become a dangerous player with the players we have right now.
I like the fact that he started for the South team in the Senior Bowl, it means he's coachable and that was among the best in that event. I don't expect him lining up as a 1 or 2 WR but I see him contributing early on ST and some packages on offense.
Goodwin could be better than Austin. Coming out of college Laverneous Coles was no Peter Warrick, but Coles was the better pro by far.
We sure did. I think he can run anchor in our 400 relay team. But, can he be productive on the football field? Because there was no comparison between the two in collage on the field.
In fairness, I think it's pretty safe to say Austin had a much better QB throwing to him than Goodwin had. lol JMO
Comment