E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Homegrown
    Havin' a ball ... rollin' to the bottom
    • Jul 2008
    • 2774

    E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

    Reasons to believe in EJ Manuel

    Why the former Florida State QB can lead Buffalo to a top-10 offense


    Quarterback hasn't been a position of strength for the Buffalo Bills in their history. Yes, the Bills did have Jim Kelly (whom I wish the best in his battle against jaw cancer) and Jack Kemp, but their fourth-highest rated passer in Pro-Football-Reference.com's career approximate value register is Ryan Fitzpatrick, who was recently cut after leading Buffalo to a mediocre 20-33 record in his four years under center.

    The necessity for upgrading at that position is a primary reason the Bills selected EJ Manuel in the first round of the 2013 NFL draft.

    That pick was seen as something of a reach given many of Manuel's question marks. Scouts Inc. noted in its pre-draft analysis of Manuel that while his physical tools and leadership qualities are unquestionably strong, he had notable issues with reading progressions, decision-making under pressure and pass accuracy.

    Given those weaknesses, it doesn't look possible for Manuel to replicate the recent dominant rookie seasons posted by Andrew Luck, Russell Wilson and Robert Griffin III -- especially since Manuel needs to first beat out Kevin Kolb for the starting job. Yet the metrics show there is a good chance Manuel could help the Bills field a top-10 offense in 2013 if he is the starter.
    That may sound far-fetched at first glance, but the Bills were not far away from being a top 10 offense in yards per play last season. According to ESPN Stats & Information, Buffalo averaged 5.58 yards per play, a mark that ranked 13th in the league.

    The primary reason for that ranking is a rushing attack that was one of the best in the NFL. Last year, Buffalo's blockers topped the league in the good blocking rate (GBR) metric with a 52.3 percent mark. (Note: GBR gauges how often the offense gives a ball carrier good run blocking, which is very roughly defined as plays when they do not allow the defense to disrupt a rush attempt.)

    That dominant performance is a major part of why C.J. Spiller was able to rank sixth in the league in the good blocking yards per attempt (GBYPA) metric that measures how productive a back is when given good blocking. His 9.1-yard GBYPA total placed fourth among lead running backs (those with the most carries on their team) and no back was given a higher GBR (53.9 percent of his rush attempts qualified as good blocking).
    The offense also had some strong suits in the passing game. ESPN Stats & Information had Fitzpatrick ranked 10th in short pass yards per attempt (defined as passes thrown 10 or fewer yards downfield). That quality showing was due in part to the Bills' aforementioned run-blocking prowess, as Buffalo leaned heavily on a dose of screen passes to rack up those gains.

    The Bills also have a top-flight vertical wideout, Steve Johnson, who averaged 22.2 yards per reception on throws 11 or more yards downfield (which is the definition of a vertical pass). That mark ranked him 16th out of the 36 players who had at least 20 vertical receptions last year.

    Buffalo upgraded its receiving corps by adding WRs Robert Woods and Marquise Goodwin via the draft. Woods' 2012 season was something of a drop-off from his 2011 campaign, but he ranked fifth in my pre-draft comparison of the top wide receivers in the 2013 NFL draft, and Goodwin provides a vertical threat.

    All of these items show that Manuel has a lot of capable offensive talent around him, so the top-10 offense question really centers on whether he can produce better numbers than Fitzpatrick did last year.

    In many ways, the bar for improvement is quite low, as Fitzpatrick ranked 27th in Total QBR last year (45.8); he had nine games with a Total QBR of under 50.0 and four games with a Total QBR of 31.8 or less. Since 50.0 is the median number for this statistic, Fitzpatrick clearly performed at a below-average level in half of his games.

    His numbers start to look even worse once the short passes are taken out of the equation, as Fitzpatrick averaged a meager 8.85 yards per vertical pass attempt. For perspective, Brady Quinn (9.21), Matt Cassel (8.95) and Mark Sanchez (9.45) -- among the worst passers in the NFL last year -- all did better than Fitzpatrick in vertical YPA.
    It isn't a given that Manuel will be able to top that figure, but he did place eighth in the nation in yards per attempt last year (8.76). That figure was higher than the YPA marks posted by Geno Smith and Matt Barkley, and Manuel didn't have the benefit of throwing to two dominant wide receivers as Smith (Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey) and Barkley (Woods and Marqise Lee) did.

    As Gary Horton notes in this article, new Bills coach Doug Marrone's up-tempo West Coast offense will provide Manuel with an opportunity to use his athleticism to run the ball if nothing is available downfield.

    While Manuel's rookie limitations will almost certainly preclude his moving the Bills' vertical pass numbers into an upper-tier range, even if he is able to move only the vertical numbers to a mediocre level, it will still be a significant plus for this offense and could be the steppingstone needed to vault this platoon into top-10 contention.
    Discuss ....
  • Goobylal
    Registered User
    • Jan 2004
    • 19370

    #2
    Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

    Considering teams could largely ignore the deep pass and stack the box, it makes the running game all the more impressive. And Levitre, the only loss on the OL, wasn't anything special in the run game. Add in a QB (EJ) who can not only make all the throws, but scramble, in addition to the running game, and it will place a ton of pressure on opposing defenses.

    Comment

    • Night Train
      Retired - On Several Levels
      • Jul 2005
      • 33117

      #3
      Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

      He's still a rookie and growing pains are a given.

      Yet this is year 1 of a new regime and Marrone might as well play him now, with future returns in mind. Grow as a team and he's your future. I don't expect much this year so why play Kolb and get 5-6 wins with Manuel holding a clipboard ? Accomplishes nothing.

      You learn by playing.
      Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

      Comment

      • SpikedLemonade
        • Jun 2024

        #4
        Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

        We had an extraordinary weak schedule last year.

        This year's schedule is much much more difficult.

        Comment

        • MitchMurrayDowntown
          Skoobasaurus-Rex
          • Oct 2011
          • 22284

          #5
          Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

          Originally posted by SpikedLemonade View Post
          We had an extraordinary weak schedule last year.

          This year's schedule is much much more difficult.
          Every year some teams fall down & some get better, so this is TBD.

          Comment

          • SpikedLemonade
            • Jun 2024

            #6
            Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

            Originally posted by MitchMurrayDowntown View Post
            Every year some teams fall down & some get better, so this is TBD.
            True.

            However, this year looks particularly tough.

            Comment

            • PTI
              Banned
              • Jan 2011
              • 5316

              #7
              Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

              I would be interested in the breakdown of the Bills yards per play last year when the Bills were losing versus winning. They played from behind a lot, skewed the offensive numbers.

              Comment

              • OLDSRIP
                Registered User
                • Dec 2008
                • 577

                #8
                Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                That breakdown just points out how bad Fitz really was. If they had even average qb play they would have won a couple more games.

                Comment

                • EDS
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 5216

                  #9
                  Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                  Between the expected improvement in play from the crucial QB position, Carrington having a breakout season, Gilmore emerging as a Revis like lockdown corner, Mario being completely healthy, a major 2013 draft haul and the shackles of Gailey/Dave W. gone, these team has a FLOOR of 10-6. You heard it here first!

                  Comment

                  • jamze132
                    Don’t hate…
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 29337

                    #10
                    Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                    If we had a QB and the ability to stop the run, we would win 10+ games every season. It comes down to roster management.

                    Comment

                    • PTI
                      Banned
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 5316

                      #11
                      Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                      Going to have to order me a jersey. I am excited by his talent.

                      Comment

                      • CoolBreeze
                        Registered User
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 1262

                        #12
                        Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                        Originally posted by Night Train View Post
                        He's still a rookie and growing pains are a given.

                        Yet this is year 1 of a new regime and Marrone might as well play him now, with future returns in mind. Grow as a team and he's your future. I don't expect much this year so why play Kolb and get 5-6 wins with Manuel holding a clipboard ? Accomplishes nothing.

                        You learn by playing.
                        I agree 100%.. Unless our coaches believe we have a shot at the playoffs with Kolb/Jackson at QB by the end of preseason, I expect Manuel to start. It'd be pointless, let Manuel take the torch early. His work ethic is excellent, his attitude is humble, and he's said on many occasions that he wants to earn his teammates and fans respect, and lead. That alone is enough to make me want to see him start week 1. But to save face because every QB can have a well rounded work ethic, great attitude etc etc. He's got the god given physical abilities. I personally think in his head, he thinks this is his job to lose. He knows it, the coaches know it, and most importantly Kolb knows it. I expect him to deliver in the preseason and be out there week 1

                        Comment

                        • Goobylal
                          Registered User
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 19370

                          #13
                          Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                          Originally posted by SpikedLemonade View Post
                          True.

                          However, this year looks particularly tough.
                          Not really.
                          Originally posted by PTI View Post
                          I would be interested in the breakdown of the Bills yards per play last year when the Bills were losing versus winning. They played from behind a lot, skewed the offensive numbers.
                          When you're playing from behind, you don't run a lot, meaning the running game is legit. The passing attack wasn't that good, and should improve, for reasons discussed.

                          Comment

                          • tomz
                            Registered User
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 1786

                            #14
                            Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                            Originally posted by SpikedLemonade View Post
                            We had an extraordinary weak schedule last year.

                            This year's schedule is much much more difficult.
                            Statistically that may be true but look at the divisions we played last year (NFC West and AFC south). I think you can argue that those divisions are at least the equal of this year's NFC South and AFC North. Miami, Jets, KC. Cleveland all dragged down the stats but they are a push on the schedule (in spite of the hype that they are somehow better, esp. KC.) SF, STL, Seattle, even AZ (5-1 when we met them, right) were arguably the best in football last year and maybe this. Strength of schedule is misleading.

                            Comment

                            • GingerP
                              Registered User
                              • Aug 2012
                              • 1717

                              #15
                              Re: E.J. Manuel (ESPN "Insider" Article)

                              Originally posted by PTI View Post
                              I would be interested in the breakdown of the Bills yards per play last year when the Bills were losing versus winning. They played from behind a lot, skewed the offensive numbers.
                              Ahead By 9-16 Points:

                              Passing - 23/35 (65.7%) 177 Yds (5.3 YPA) 1 TD, 0 Int 88.3 QB Rating
                              Rushing - 59 Att, 204 Yds (3.5 YPA), 1 TD

                              Ahead By 1-8 Points:

                              Passing - 56/98 (57.1%) 604 Yds (6.2 YPA) 4 TD, 3 Int 76.5 QB Rating
                              Rushing - 106 Att, 427 Yds (4.0 YPA), 2 TD

                              Behind By 1-8 Points:

                              Passing - 99/159 (62.3%) 1004 Yds (6.7 YPA) 7 TD, 6 Int 80.9 QB Rating
                              Rushing - 111 Att, 639 Yds (5.8 YPA), 2 TD

                              Behind By 9-16 Points:

                              Passing - 47/76 (61.8%) 503 Yds (7.0 YPA) 3 TD, 3 Int 79.7 QB Rating
                              Rushing - 43 Att, 268 Yds (6.2 YPA), 3 TD

                              Visit ESPN for Buffalo Bills live scores, video highlights, and latest news. Find standings and the full 2024 season schedule.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X