OpIv37
06-07-2013, 12:48 PM
First, let me start by saying that I think buying out Leino is a no-brainer. Just pay the man and get his cap hit off the books. If the team is going to win, and if Pegula is serious about money not being a factor, it simply has to be done.
In terms of Miller and Vanek, both are on the last year of their contract and both will be difficult to re-sign. Miller is at the end of his prime and likely will want to finish his career on a contender. Vanek is in his prime and will likely want to play for a contender as well. The Sabres are rebuilding and aren't likely to be a contender for 2-3 years. So, do we move both of these guys for prospects or younger talent and try to speed up the rebuilding process? They both have value and will likely get us good return, and they will free up a lot of cap space to sign young FA's and lock up anyone that the team feels is worth it. Or, do we keep them for another year to try to win and use their experience to help the young guys, but risk losing them for nothing?
This team lacks talent as it is, and without Miller and Vanek the talent level would be horrific, but again, we'd get good return in the trade and have tons of cap space to make moves, so the assumption would be that the talent would be replaced.
I had pretty much assumed Miller was going to be traded, but I saw yesterday that Vanek was in the same situation. At first, moving him seemed a bit crazy, but the more I think about it, the more sense it makes.
In terms of Miller and Vanek, both are on the last year of their contract and both will be difficult to re-sign. Miller is at the end of his prime and likely will want to finish his career on a contender. Vanek is in his prime and will likely want to play for a contender as well. The Sabres are rebuilding and aren't likely to be a contender for 2-3 years. So, do we move both of these guys for prospects or younger talent and try to speed up the rebuilding process? They both have value and will likely get us good return, and they will free up a lot of cap space to sign young FA's and lock up anyone that the team feels is worth it. Or, do we keep them for another year to try to win and use their experience to help the young guys, but risk losing them for nothing?
This team lacks talent as it is, and without Miller and Vanek the talent level would be horrific, but again, we'd get good return in the trade and have tons of cap space to make moves, so the assumption would be that the talent would be replaced.
I had pretty much assumed Miller was going to be traded, but I saw yesterday that Vanek was in the same situation. At first, moving him seemed a bit crazy, but the more I think about it, the more sense it makes.