Tweet
He never would have tried the 55 yard field goal, or the 2 point conversion in the 3rd quarter. So instead of a 1 point win, we would have lost by 3 and it would have been considered a meaningless end of game touchdown.
-
-
Re: Chan would have lost this game
Can we stop using Chan Gailey as our measuring stick?Originally posted by LOSman WINSOriginally posted by Prov401Originally posted by better days -
Re: Chan would have lost this game
Who?Comment
-
Re: Chan would have lost this game
I thought Jauron more than Chan.
Dick loved meaningless late scores to make the losing margin closer, after getting outcoached all game. He considered that a win.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for witComment
-
Re: Chan would have lost this game
I always liked Chan, but it was his fault he wasn't eager to have a better QB running his offense or that he wasn't worried about stopping the other guys from scoring.
In the end every decision he made was magnified but his tenure failed the moment he put all the responsibility on Fitz shouldersComment
-
Re: Chan would have lost this game
I never ever want to hear the names Chan Gailey and Fitzpatrick again. It was like a recurring nightmare every Sunday.Comment
Comment