PDA

View Full Version : Review of Nix picks... Let's try this again



ServoBillieves
09-20-2013, 08:34 AM
JCBills wrote:

This has been a heated debate on the boards since Nix was made GM.

Before you read anything I have to say about these picks, understand that these are young guys still developing their craft. A lot of fans expect instant results from players that are learning the NFL game. We have been fortunate enough to recently have a few rookies establish themselves early on, but that can't be the expectation for most of the young crop. A lot of players take a few seasons to really live up to expectations, some positions have a tougher learning curve than others. Nothing is certain, but the combination of youth and talent they have put together over the past few seasons looks like the best they have had in a while. This is simply a viewpoint, not an evaluation that claims to be definitive. Buffalo is currently the 3rd youngest team in the NFL, and I know the word "potential" is overused and at times annoying to see, but this Bills team is in the position to grow together into a very good football team. Anyone paying attention can see their potential (lol i know right) but as with any team it comes down to execution. Onto the picks.

2010:

CJ Spiller 1st - Spiller has emerged as one of the most explosive backs in the NFL. Looks to be a very good pick. In 2012, Spiller was the 4th fastest player to reach 1,000 yds based on how many carries it took in NFL history. Exceptional pass-catcher considering he's a runningback. Fierce competitor and a home run threat on any play.

Torrell Troup 2nd - Injuries have sidelined Troup for most of his career thus far. Had the potential to be a decent rotational player, but wasn't able to recover from a back injury. Probably done in the NFL.

Alex Carrington 3rd - Carrington has developed into a very versatile defensive lineman and a big part of this Buffalo D, having played DE, DT, and OLB. Exceptional ST player (3 blocked FG in 2012 - franchise record), graded out as one of the best backup DL in the NFL in 2012 per PFF.com. "Megahand" was able to add around 20lbs since entering the league without sacrificing much athleticism at all. I think this is his contract year, and it would be in the team's best interest to extend him.

Marcus Easley 4th - Easley also battled injury early on, but this season had an exceptional preseason and has made a few big plays on special teams in the regular season. He beat out a few talented young UDFA WRs (Da'Rick Rogers - Once considered the best WR in the SEC before his troubles - Brandon Kaufman - Holder of the FCS single season receiving yards record with 1,850) to stick around again, but sits behind what looks to be a talented WR group.

Ed Wang 5th - Bad pick, but you don't expect much from the guys that are taken at this point in the draft. Wang bounced around the league for a bit, but currently isn't on an NFL roster.

Arthur Moats 6th - Winner of the Buck Buchanan award as the best defensive player in FCS (1-AA) Moats hasn't been able to find an identity yet in the league, having been moved around from inside to outside in a few different schemes. He looks like he's doing a little better in Pettine's new scheme.

Danny Batten 6th - Batten, like Moats, was a standout in the FCS (1-AA) that specialized in rushing the passer. He wasn't able to stick for long. Bad pick, but again this is late in the draft. Batten has been out of the NFL since his release.

Levi Brown 7th - Project QB that obviously didn't pan out. He tried making it in the CFL but wasn't able to stick.

Kyle Calloway 7th - Project OG, see above. Had a stint in the UFL and a few weeks with the Ravens.

Spiller and Carrington were obviously the best picks, with one ending up an elite NFL RB and the other an exceptionally versatile lineman. Easley and Moats look like they could be valuable backups and ST players, which is about what you would expect based on where they were taken. Outside of that, this was a poor draft.

2011:

Marcell Dareus 1st - Dareus has had some ups and downs, but has been dominant at times. Still coming into his own at just 23 years of age, Dareus has already shown enough to think he could end up being a real force in the NFL. In his 34 games played he has posted 12 sacks and 9 pass deflections. Anyone who watches games has seen him blow up run plays at times. Dareus has scary potential, and I think Pettine's scheme paired with the talent they have acquired will show what the "rolling ball of butcher knives" can do. (One of the best scout quotes I've heard, per PFW). Looks like he can end up worth the pick.

Aaron Williams 2nd - Williams struggled at times when playing CB, but the move to safety has shown to be a successful one so far. Like Dareus, Williams is still very young at 23. Through week 2 he sits at 4th the NFL in tackles, and has come up with some big plays. Everyone saw the dumb penalty in week 2, but other than that he has played well this season. He has the skills to end up being a good safety in the NFL, and remember he is still learning the position.

Kelvin Sheppard 3rd - Shep was OK in his time with Buffalo before being traded for Jerry Hughes. Wasn't the impact player the team needed him to be. He has seen some action this season with the Colts in both games this season, starting one of the two. Hughes has played 98 of 170 snaps so far with 0.5 sacks over the 2 games played.

Da'Norris Searcy 4th - Searcy has been a solid backup so far and has kicked it up this season filling in for Byrd. Still has too many ugly plays, but he has been a good value so far. Capable of some big hits, Searcy could end up a valuable 3rd safety if the Bills can sign Byrd to a long term contract.

Chris Hairston 5th - Hairston played very well filling in for Pears and Glenn, but hasn't been able to stay healthy yet. When he is though, he has executed some beautiful blocks that lead to big plays. He won't see any action this year, but if he can get healthy he has the potential to be a long term answer at RT.

Johnny White 6th - White was part of the search to find a solid 3rd RB but couldn't beat out Choice. He spent some time with the Packers last season, but isn't on an NFL roster at the moment.

Chris White 6th - Stuck around for a few seasons but saw little to no action, most of his snaps were on ST. Traded to the Lions for practice squad QB Thaddeus Lewis then cut, White is now on the Patriots.

Justin Rogers 7th - Based on value, Rogers has outplayed where he was drafted. He has made a few big plays so far 3 years into his career, mostly as a reserve corner, and has 4 starts under his belt with 31 games played. Still developing, but looks like a decent dime back.

Michael Jasper 7th - Obscure gamble pick based on size/athleticism combo, though he hasn't displayed football toughness or any sort of consistency. Bounced around to a few teams but is currently a free agent.

This draft is looking better over time. The players that have stuck and contributed have improved over time. The early picks have been productive (Dareus, Williams) and some of the mid to late picks seem like they payed off.(Searcy, Rogers, Hairston) Pettine's scheme seems to have boosted the defensive picks from this class.

2012:

Stephon Gilmore 1st - Gilmore's play was exceptional for a rookie in 2012. He regularly covered the opposition's top WR every game, and looks like he can end up being a top CB in the league. 6th in PDef as a rookie with 16 on the season, Gilmore has displayed the ability to be an extremely well-rounded CB. Looks like a very good 1st round choice.

Cordy Glenn 2nd - Most analysts had Glenn kicking inside to play guard once reaching the NFL, but he has been nothing less than solid through the start of his career. He has been exceptional in pass protection so far in 2013, with some quality pass rushers barely getting to sniff Manuel. Also had a very good rookie campaign.

TJ Graham 3rd - Graham hasn't lived up to expectations, but he is still learning. A lot of wideouts take a few seasons to get it together in the NFL, and Graham also recently turned 24 so I'm not shocked he hasn't done all that much yet. Explosive athlete that still needs a good amount of work.

Nigel Bradham 4th - Bradham had a solid rookie showing with 11 starts, but there are some indications the new regime isn't a huge fan of him. Maybe it was from the arrest, but Moats has been getting more snaps. He is a physical freak, but needs work on his mental game. Explosive hitter with above average coverage skills. Extremely high ceiling.

Ron Brooks 4th - Brooks was buried behind some of the best CBs in college football during his time at LSU, but played very well when called upon. Brooks is quite the athlete, but is coming off his second foot injury in as many seasons. If he can regain his health, he is another young player who can end up a decent ST and sub package contributor.

Zebrie Sanders 5th - Sanders had a pretty good career at Florida State playing both tackle positions, but hip injuries derailed his NFL career. He looked to be a developmental swing tackle and a good value in the 5th, but he couldn't get healthy and was released before the start of the season.

Tank Carder 5th - Carder looked like a great value at this pick according to the "experts", but didn't stick with the Bills despite a lackluster LB corps. Found a roster spot with the Browns and has been with them since.

Mark Asper 6th - Developmental OT/OG prospect that bounced around to the Vikings and Jaguars before coming back to the Bills practice squad.

John Potter 7th - Big boot kicker that stuck around as a kickoff specialist for a while before being released in week 6. Currently kicking for the Redskins.

Gilmore and Glenn look like the two big hits of this draft, though it is still too early to tell. Bradham could end up a mainstay, but whether or not that happens is up to him and his commitment to the game and the team. Brooks has been on a roller coaster, but the potential is there. The rest of the draft was basically useless.

2013:

EJ Manuel 1st - This is the hardest pick to comment on, especially as a Bills fan. It is easy to pour your hopes and dreams into the shiny new QB, but I try to keep emotions aside when evaluating a player. I know I said it at the start, but I can't emphasize the importance of the youth factor enough. The Bills made a push to surround their rookie QB with talented weapons, but growing pains are imminent. If this young group can learn and improve together, Manuel could be a terror.

Robert Woods 2nd - How many 21 year old WRs get tagged with the label "polished"? Woods has been impressive so far, and as this young offense grows together, expect him to be a huge part of it. Woods and Stevie could be a lethal WR tandem for a long time. Woody seems to already have a connection with EJ.

Kiko Alonso 2nd - Playmaker. Alonso has had a big impact in his two games so far, registering 19 Tackles, 1 Sack, 1 INT, 1 PD, 1 FF, 1 FR. Kiko played a huge part in the win over Carolina, and looks like he can be a very good linebacker in the NFL. He still needs work in quite a few aspects of his game, but has every chance to grow into a monster with this new scheme and talented personnel around him.

Marquise Goodwin 3rd - Another raw burner like Graham, we saw his freakish speed with the 108yd KR for a TD in preseason. Unfortunately he suffered a fractured hand that required surgery, but Goodwin is the type of player that can flourish in a WR group where DBs are forced to pay attention to Stevie and Woody. I'll be interested to see what he can do when he's back.

Duke Williams 4th - Limited action makes it hard to see what Duke will end up as in the NFL, but his college tape is exciting. Developmental player that should have a part in ST early on. Hits like a linebacker and has some ball skills. Only has 6 defensive snaps so far but he could see more action down the line.

Jonathan Meeks 5th - Developmental sub-package DB who hasn't played a regular season snap yet, but has been active for both games. Meeks has a good amount of college experience with decent production to go with it. Might not stick for long, but has the potential to be a contributor.

Dustin Hopkins 6th - Beat out long-time and much loved kicker Rian Lindell for the position and has displayed a powerful leg. Unfortunately he's currently injured, but looks like he could be a long term replacement.

Chris Gragg 7th - Developmental receiving TE with 4.5 speed. Yet to see any action, Gragg needs to work on blocking if he wants to get on the field. Good value at this point in the draft. Undersized, but could be a decent H-Back in time.

The first 3 picks look very good so far. I'm excited to see what Goodwin can do in this offense when he's healthy and teams are forced to put their attention on Stevie and Woody. T.J. and Goodwin are absolute burners.Hopefully they can develop into solid contributors because we know the athleticism is there. Every pick from this class made the team, but it is easy to be more optimistic about players with a small sample size to evaluate them on.

Overall, it looks like the drafts under Nix have been significantly better than they have in the painful years of picks like Maybin, Flowers, Williams, and Losman. He has also made some moves on the waiver wire grabbing quality players like Urbik, and helped bring in some of the best FA signings in franchise history, and also has locked up home grown talent like they haven't been able to in the past. Obviously all of that is a culmination of effort across the entire team, but those changes didn't start happening until Nix was given a good chunk of control. Discuss.

The people here aren't "experts". Nice opinion, though.

mayotm
09-20-2013, 08:49 AM
The people here aren't "experts". Nice opinion, though.You're right, people posting here aren't experts. However, there are many who certainly think they are.

MTBillsFan
09-20-2013, 11:01 AM
Of all the picks, the Troup pick stings the most. Wasn't Gronk was on the board? Coulda, shoulda, woulda...

lightningbolt444
09-20-2013, 11:50 AM
The amount of people on the board that think we should hit on every pick is amazing. ALL teams miss on players in ALL rounds. If you think we can get 5 starters a draft you should research the draft a bit it is a crap shoot.

I also hate to hear well so and so was on the board. Guess what you can do that with EVERY pick. Picking three years later is much easier. Every team could have had Tom Brady and many other players but passed on them to draft busts instead. Just because Troup was a bust and Gronk is great does not mean Nix failed (not saying he did not jury is still out). Gronk had a a huge injury question mark on him he had just sat out the season with major back surgery and with the Bills being as bad as they were/are they rely on their young picks to play and couldn't afford to take a 2nd round pick that wouldn't play (again hindsight is 20/20).

OpIv37
09-20-2013, 12:00 PM
:rolleyes:

First, comparing this draft to previous Bills drafts is setting the bar ridiculously low. The goal is to draft well enough to improve the team, not to the horrid drafts of the past.

Second, this drafting isn't that much better than previous drafting. The only real improvement is no big first round whiffs.

Third, this doesn't factor in the guys we could have had within the next few picks after ours. And this isn't "drafting 3 years later" as lightningbolt44 claims. There were plenty of analysts who had those guys ranked ahead of the guys we took, and even posters on this board who said we should have taken those other players ON DRAFT DAY.

These drafts are mediocre, but Bills fans have become so used to mediocrity and so used to being apologists for this horrid FO that some of you can't see it.

better days
09-20-2013, 12:03 PM
Of all the picks, the Troup pick stings the most. Wasn't Gronk was on the board? Coulda, shoulda, woulda...

Years ago, I wanted the Bills to draft Larry Czonka. Syracuse guy.

Instead he goes to Miami, Coulda, shoulda, woulda.

OpIv37
09-20-2013, 12:03 PM
The amount of people on the board that think we should hit on every pick is amazing. ALL teams miss on players in ALL rounds. If you think we can get 5 starters a draft you should research the draft a bit it is a crap shoot.

I also hate to hear well so and so was on the board. Guess what you can do that with EVERY pick. Picking three years later is much easier. Every team could have had Tom Brady and many other players but passed on them to draft busts instead. Just because Troup was a bust and Gronk is great does not mean Nix failed (not saying he did not jury is still out). Gronk had a a huge injury question mark on him he had just sat out the season with major back surgery and with the Bills being as bad as they were/are they rely on their young picks to play and couldn't afford to take a 2nd round pick that wouldn't play (again hindsight is 20/20).
Actually the Troup pick was a fail. Many people knew about his injury history before he was drafted, unlike Gronk.

And even if Gronk never plays again, he still did far more for NE than Troup ever did for us.

Drafting is not an exact science but it is a science and some are better at it than others. Only someone who has accepted mediocrity would try to defend this pick.

OpIv37
09-20-2013, 12:06 PM
The people here aren't "experts". Nice opinion, though.

Unfortunately many of the people here who aren't experts get it right when the supposed "experts" who get millions from the team get it wrong.

TedMock
09-20-2013, 12:08 PM
A couple things to also keep in minde are injury and where they were drafted.

It's tough to blame injuries on a GM. Troup may have sucked all through, for example, or he may have developed into a stud. Unfortunate circumstances kept him from displaying his talent one way or the other. This is all magnified by Gronk being picked right after.

Where they were drafted is also huge. The question is "do you have reasonable expectations?" You don't want any fo them to suck, obviously, but you can't reasonably expect a 3rd rounder to be a grade-A stud, or a 5th rounder to be your answer at any position. You hope in the mid rounds to pick good players who will be good backups and have the potential to develop, in my opinion. Hairston pre-injury is a good example there. A 5th round pick who seems to get better and play consistent football each year. Of course, the expectations are, and should be, much higher for 1st and 2nd rounders. 6th, 7th and FA's are where good scouts can really stand out as so many of these guys never make it, or last very long when they do. There are always diamonds though.

TedMock
09-20-2013, 12:13 PM
Actually the Troup pick was a fail. Many people knew about his injury history before he was drafted, unlike Gronk.

And even if Gronk never plays again, he still did far more for NE than Troup ever did for us.

Drafting is not an exact science but it is a science and some are better at it than others. Only someone who has accepted mediocrity would try to defend this pick.

I think you may have mis-typed. Gronk had the back injury and surgery in college. Troup started every game his junior and senior years and there weren't any glaring issues. Still, in hindsight, ouch.

better days
09-20-2013, 12:52 PM
:rolleyes:

First, comparing this draft to previous Bills drafts is setting the bar ridiculously low. The goal is to draft well enough to improve the team, not to the horrid drafts of the past.

Second, this drafting isn't that much better than previous drafting. The only real improvement is no big first round whiffs.

Third, this doesn't factor in the guys we could have had within the next few picks after ours. And this isn't "drafting 3 years later" as lightningbolt44 claims. There were plenty of analysts who had those guys ranked ahead of the guys we took, and even posters on this board who said we should have taken those other players ON DRAFT DAY.

These drafts are mediocre, but Bills fans have become so used to mediocrity and so used to being apologists for this horrid FO that some of you can't see it.

AGAIN, JCBills has SHOWN that the Bills have drafted WELL when Nix was GM.

You just refuse to accept that FACT.

OpIv37
09-20-2013, 01:15 PM
AGAIN, JCBills has SHOWN that the Bills have drafted WELL when Nix was GM.

You just refuse to accept that FACT.

Except they didn't draft well. While he had a good write-up, there were some flaws in his conclusions that I already pointed out. Your bar for "drafted well" is set way, way too low.

X-Era
09-20-2013, 01:22 PM
Any serious claim that the Bills have or have not drafted well has to show data to prove it. I'd like to see the data that shows what "drafting well" equates to as far as number of starters, studs, or players still with the team. Hell, pick the bar to compare us against (most other NFL teams) and show how we are above or below it.

Until then we're arguing opinions.

In my opinion, Nix has drafted well. I will believe that until the facts show otherwise.

"Drafting well" is netting two solid starters and 2 or 3 additional players who make the team as backups/ST's from each draft. I'd then add an additional requirement of one star out of every two or three years.

That's my fairly educated guess on what "drafting well" should look like.

lightningbolt444
09-20-2013, 01:29 PM
Except they didn't draft well. While he had a good write-up, there were some flaws in his conclusions that I already pointed out. Your bar for "drafted well" is set way, way too low.

I disagree I think he drafted above average while here. Was it great no but it was pretty good. Failure to stick to a system, get solid coordinators and not retain the right young guys.

At the time of the draft some were saying gronk could possibly never play due to injury. That was not a risk the Bills could afford to take at the time.

Compare other teams drafting over the same time and many are much much worse.

DesertFox24
09-20-2013, 04:08 PM
Well this is on the thing that I like about the new regime they are going to include analytics in the decisions on who to draft and where.

Lastly fans are either going to like the draft or hate the draft, but the truth of the matter is they have a lot more information that we do regarding the person the player not just how he played on saturday.

The true test of how well a team drafts is if they have depth across the board because good drafting teams draft players in the later rounds that a decent players and not a huge drop off from the starter, and they sprinkle in a pro bowler here and there (not every year).

IlluminatusUIUC
09-20-2013, 05:44 PM
"Drafting well" is of course tied to the talent available. The 2011 draft was one of the most stacked I've ever seen and to come away with that lineup is inexcusable. It's like the old expression: He fell in a barrel of boobs and came out sucking his own thumb.

2010 was a horrendous draft but that was a leaner year overall. 2012 and 2013 drafts have looked good so far.

The crap coaching hires and horrendous contracts for guys like Anderson and Fitz have been his real blunders, and the constant scheme changing is the root of that.

BuffaloRedleg
09-20-2013, 09:57 PM
Nobody will ever be able to convince me that any of those picks were more important than taking a QB. Yes we finally took one and he has looked the part, but man, he should never be excused for passing on Wilson and Kaepernick. You can say "hindsight is 20/20" and "31 other teams passed on him" until you are blue in the face, but we needed a QB and we never took one. Nix should not be forgiven for that.

Don't Panic
09-20-2013, 10:08 PM
Except they didn't draft well. While he had a good write-up, there were some flaws in his conclusions that I already pointed out. Your bar for "drafted well" is set way, way too low.

I have to agree, and I am an admitted Homer. These drafts are average all in all. The have the potential to improve, but there is no guarantee. Good drafts find really solid contributors in the late rounds and rarely miss on the early rounds. We have a ways to go before we can say that for ourselves.

feldspar
09-20-2013, 10:14 PM
First of all, it's too early to tell with a lot of the Nix-era players.

Secondly, losing games is not necessarily the only indication as to whether there is talent on your team or not. You need a coach and a QB above all else if you want to win games consistently in this league...a thing I stress all the time. The latest example is Kansas City, who won only TWO games last year despite having talent on that team. They brought in Andy Reid and Alex Smith...after only week 3, they have already won more games than last year over that entire season.

If this Bills team got the Coach(s) and QB right this time, they don't have to get all that many different players to become a serious contender IMO...maybe not this year, but in the near future. This team has plenty of other talent at different spots right now, but THE MOST IMPORTANT spots are variables...coach and QB.

X-Era
09-22-2013, 08:27 AM
This new thread is just to merge the old content in.

better days
09-22-2013, 09:05 AM
Let's face it, the 2013 Draft will really define Nix's tenure as GM of the Bills. Nix said he did not want to leave the Bills until he found the team a franchise QB.

If EJ is that man, the FRANCHISE QB, in a few years Nix will be viewed as second only to Polian as a Bills GM.

X-Era
09-22-2013, 09:13 AM
JCBills said:


First of all, it's too early to tell with a lot of the Nix-era players.

Secondly, losing games is not necessarily the only indication as to whether there is talent on your team or not. You need a coach and a QB above all else if you want to win games consistently in this league...a thing I stress all the time. The latest example is Kansas City, who won only TWO games last year despite having talent on that team. They brought in Andy Reid and Alex Smith...after only week 3, they have already won more games than last year over that entire season.

If this Bills team got the Coach(s) and QB right this time, they don't have to get all that many different players to become a serious contender IMO...maybe not this year, but in the near future. This team has plenty of other talent at different spots right now, but THE MOST IMPORTANT spots are variables...coach and QB.

I agree, hence the title of the thread. These guys are still so young and haven't had an ideal situation until maybe now. The talent and youth combo this FO has put together seems impressive so far. Again, way too early to tell, but the new HC / QB combo with the supporting talent could translate into Buffalo being a good football team.

- - - Updated - - -

feldspar said:


I agree, hence the title of the thread. These guys are still so young and haven't had an ideal situation until maybe now. The talent and youth combo this FO has put together seems impressive so far. Again, way too early to tell, but the new HC / QB combo with the supporting talent could translate into Buffalo being a good football team.

Yep...could be, and hopefully is. We'll see.

Also, how many starters on this team are less than serviceable or good? Most guys are fairly solid at the very least. Dunno if some fans are thinking that the team should be loaded to the gills with stars; it simply doesn't work that way.

You can be hypercritical about this player or that if you are anal retentive or have a full-time job being an "expert" that wants to get fans talking, but the Bills may have laid a seriously decent foundation personnel-wise here. Who the hell would argue that this exact same team wouldn't gain serious respect with a top coach and QB? And that's my whole point, which I think you agree with.

We are talking about the guys that are on the top of the chain about what happens on game-day, both on the field and on the sidelines.

X-Era
09-22-2013, 09:14 AM
JCBills said:


Yep...could be, and hopefully is. We'll see.

Also, how many starters on this team are less than serviceable or good? Most guys are fairly solid at the very least. Dunno if some fans are thinking that the team should be loaded to the gills with stars; it simply doesn't work that way.

You can be hypercritical about this player or that if you are anal retentive or have a full-time job being an "expert" that wants to get fans talking, but the Bills may have laid a seriously decent foundation personnel-wise here. Who the hell would argue that this exact same team wouldn't gain serious respect with a top coach and QB? And that's my whole point, which I think you agree with.

We are talking about the guys that are on the top of the chain about what happens on game-day, both on the field and on the sidelines.

The foundation the team has built is the reason for my optimism. They don't have all-pros all over the place, but top-level guys like Spiller and Stevie make this offense dangerous. The OL is better than most, though depth is a concern. The mix at RB between Spiller and Jackson is exceptional, with Choice being a very good 3rd RB. EJ has impressed so far, and we need to be patient. He has shown reasons to think he is the real deal in the small sample size we have. The WRs have limitless talent, but of course it comes down to putting it together. With that said, we know what Stevie can do and Woods looks like he's on his way to making this a lethal 1-2 punch at WR. Graham and Goodwin are still developing, but their speed makes them a threat. They have built some very good in-house talent on defense and added some solid pieces in free agency. Young guys are stepping up. Of course I'm saying this within the context of it being very early to really evaluate some of them in total fairness, but I think we have more reasons to get excited than we have in a long time.

- - - Updated - - -

JCBills said:


:rolleyes:

First, comparing this draft to previous Bills drafts is setting the bar ridiculously low. The goal is to draft well enough to improve the team, not to the horrid drafts of the past.

Second, this drafting isn't that much better than previous drafting. The only real improvement is no big first round whiffs.

Third, this doesn't factor in the guys we could have had within the next few picks after ours. And this isn't "drafting 3 years later" as lightningbolt44 claims. There were plenty of analysts who had those guys ranked ahead of the guys we took, and even posters on this board who said we should have taken those other players ON DRAFT DAY.

These drafts are mediocre, but Bills fans have become so used to mediocrity and so used to being apologists for this horrid FO that some of you can't see it.

I know drafting better than years before isn't a high bar, but it is a sign of progress. These drafts are drastically better than before Nix came in, same with the way the front office approached free agency and found some decent UDFA talent. I'm not saying we're on our way to being an AFC empire, but I think that over time Nix's work will look better and better as these young players grow together.

X-Era
09-22-2013, 09:15 AM
Better Days said:


I know drafting better than years before isn't a high bar, but it is a sign of progress. These drafts are drastically better than before Nix came in, same with the way the front office approached free agency and found some decent UDFA talent. I'm not saying we're on our way to being an AFC empire, but I think that over time Nix's work will look better and better as these young players grow together.

IMO, no first rnd whiffs is a huge deal. And Op makes it sound like Nix got nothing of value in the other rnds which as you pointed out is pure BS.

- - - Updated - - -

Meathead said:


Any serious claim that the Bills have or have not drafted well has to show data to prove it. I'd like to see the data that shows what "drafting well" equates to as far as number of starters, studs, or players still with the team. Hell, pick the bar to compare us against (most other NFL teams) and show how we are above or below it.


this is so perfectly logical i expected that kind of analysis already existed somewhere ... and it does ... sort of

heres a chart (http://www.drafttek.com/consolidatednfldraft-stillwithteam.asp) with that data but a) its a year old and c) its only 09-11 so we cant see the most important years (beyond four from draft year) for much current relevance. its lacks some important calculations but it looks like it would be fairly easy to import into excel if somebody is less lazy than me

seems like there should be a complete historical analysis like this by now somewhere on the interwebs but this is the best i could find


"Drafting well" is netting two solid starters and 2 or 3 additional players who make the team as backups/ST's from each draft. I'd then add an additional requirement of one star out of every two or three years.

That's my fairly educated guess on what "drafting well" should look like.

good first guess. quotas per draft is tough bc the number of picks each year is variable but on average id guess you were fairly close

also i think any valid analysis should start with three or at least two full seasons after draft year since:
- most times teams are going to give their recent draft picks heavy leeway in making a roster just to see if they develop. if they can stick at least two but even better three full seasons then youve got a great idea if that was a 'good' pick or not
- bad teams will keep more draftees than good teams, pushing the analysis to three plus seasons and beyond evens some of that artificial disparity out

so unfortunately we still dont have great data to go by, but i do like your starting wag. without spending a whole bunch of boring hours collecting data for benchmarks, lets just refine our guess:

estimate: what a draft should look like to be average
------------------------------------------------
8 team picks
1 elite player at least every third draft
2 starters per draft
2 backups per draft

then decide if it takes two or three years to make a reliable evaluation of that pick. i say it should be three so the only season we can look at is

2010:
--------
1 elite player (spiller)
2 starters (carrington, spiller)
2 backups (easley, moats)

ppl ***** and moan about 2010 but honestly id say thats a decent draft. depending on how you define 'elite' and how spiller looks in this first year of being featured, id say it could still move to being 'good' if he becomes super-elite enough to maintain a top five ypc average for an extended period lets say two full seasons

X-Era
09-22-2013, 09:16 AM
this is so perfectly logical i expected that kind of analysis already existed somewhere ... and it does ... sort of

heres a chart (http://www.drafttek.com/consolidatednfldraft-stillwithteam.asp) with that data but a) its a year old and c) its only 09-11 so we cant see the most important years (beyond four from draft year) for much current relevance. its lacks some important calculations but it looks like it would be fairly easy to import into excel if somebody is less lazy than me

seems like there should be a complete historical analysis like this by now somewhere on the interwebs but this is the best i could find



good first guess. quotas per draft is tough bc the number of picks each year is variable but on average id guess you were fairly close

also i think any valid analysis should start with three or at least two full seasons after draft year since:
- most times teams are going to give their recent draft picks heavy leeway in making a roster just to see if they develop. if they can stick at least two but even better three full seasons then youve got a great idea if that was a 'good' pick or not
- bad teams will keep more draftees than good teams, pushing the analysis to three plus seasons and beyond evens some of that artificial disparity out

so unfortunately we still dont have great data to go by, but i do like your starting wag. without spending a whole bunch of boring hours collecting data for benchmarks, lets just refine our guess:

estimate: what a draft should look like to be average
------------------------------------------------
8 team picks
1 elite player at least every third draft
2 starters per draft
2 backups per draft

then decide if it takes two or three years to make a reliable evaluation of that pick. i say it should be three so the only season we can look at is

2010:
--------
1 elite player (spiller)
2 starters (carrington, spiller)
2 backups (easley, moats)

ppl ***** and moan about 2010 but honestly id say thats a decent draft. depending on how you define 'elite' and how spiller looks in this first year of being featured, id say it could still move to being 'good' if he becomes super-elite enough to maintain a top five ypc average for an extended period lets say two full seasonsOn point.

Two or three full seasons is a very valid point. Which means we have only the 2010 draft to judge Nix by. That one was my least favorite. I thought both Troup and Carrington were taken too high. But no Carrington has come on and is possibly a solid starter.

On the "average draft"- I'm pretty sure Nix has said he wanted us to be getting 3 starters per draft. I think that's too much to ask for from a draft class and I worried it was a cost saving measure to not pay for that 3rd starter from FA. But, in this past draft, he appears to have done it. However, it's still too early to tell.

As far as the chart Atlanta and Baltimore stand out on the good side... Dallas, Philly, and NE on the bad side. The data to show how poor NE has drafted is out there, I've put it up before I'm too lazy right now to go look again.

X-Era
09-22-2013, 09:31 AM
Sorry guys. I embedded that info on NE's drafts and it screwed the thread. The only way to get the thread back (that I could figure out).

Was to re-create it. That made the thread all goofy as far as who said what and when. My apologies.