Washington Bravehearts?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JohnnyGold
    Registered User
    • Dec 2008
    • 361

    Washington Bravehearts?

    The Higher Ground Times delivers breaking news and commentary on the issues that affect the future of our nation.
  • Gibby
    Power & Authority Demand Responsibility to the common good, and must never be abused.
    • Jun 2006
    • 18211

    #2
    Re: Washington Bravehearts?

    How about washington Congressmen, they could be called the cons for short. Think about the novelty, they would be the only team who'se home crowd would boo them when they got onto the field.

    Comment

    • JoeMama
      Emotion Sickness
      • Oct 2002
      • 18183

      #3
      Re: Washington Bravehearts?

      As racist and derogatory as the name Redskins is, American Indians approve of it by like 90%.

      So I'm inclined to say who cares and let it stand.
      Disclaimer: The sentiment expressed in this post is strictly for entertainment purposes only.

      Comment

      • Gibby
        Power & Authority Demand Responsibility to the common good, and must never be abused.
        • Jun 2006
        • 18211

        #4
        Re: Washington Bravehearts?

        Originally posted by JoeMama View Post
        As racist and derogatory as the name Redskins is, American Indians approve of it by like 90%.

        So I'm inclined to say who cares and let it stand.
        Not to be an ass, but I keep hearing that statistic, and I was wondering where that survey came from, who conducted the survey, etc.

        Comment

        • BertSquirtgum
          Registered User
          • May 2009
          • 13379

          #5
          Re: Washington Bravehearts?

          Originally posted by JoeMama View Post
          As racist and derogatory as the name Redskins is, American Indians approve of it by like 90%.

          So I'm inclined to say who cares and let it stand.
          Yes

          Comment

          • Mad Bomber
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 12927

            #6
            Re: Washington Bravehearts?

            Originally posted by MST3KBillsfan View Post
            Not to be an ass, but I keep hearing that statistic, and I was wondering where that survey came from, who conducted the survey, etc.
            It was a 2004 poll by the Annenberg Public Policy center of some 750 Native Americans. 90% did not object, and 9% found it offensive.

            Comment

            • Victor7
              Registered User
              • Jul 2013
              • 1270

              #7
              Re: Washington Bravehearts?

              I still can't believe they are making them change Redskins. Some people are too sensitive.

              Comment

              • feldspar
                Registered User
                • Mar 2007
                • 13620

                #8
                Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                Originally posted by Victor7 View Post
                I still can't believe they are making them change Redskins. Some people are too sensitive.
                Maybe there will be a push to change the name of the Cowboys too, since they were out to kill the Indians.

                While you are at it, stop the children from playing cowboys and Indians, because some ******* may be offended.

                Personally, I never considered "Redskins" to be neither racist nor derogatory. Applied here, it's Washington's brand and they actually take a lot of pride in it.

                Comment

                • DetDannyWilliams
                  Nobody in Hawaii wears a tie.
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 4186

                  #9
                  Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                  We went through this with our name of our school Iroquois Chiefs and our mascot which was a Chief, the school board gave in before it could go to court and we were ready for the fight also! but the school board gave us excuses like they said that "they didn't want to be dragged through the mud" and "couldn't afford a lawsuit" so they caved and came to an agreement with the Native Americans that wanted the name and logo changed. We were still going to be named the Iroquois Chiefs but we had to change our logo it was changed to a big capital I with an indian headress on the right tail of the I which I still think to this day is the school is built on Iroquois sovereign land there is even a plaque which was placed to the west of the flagpole which is located in the center of the bus loop and the chief head our logo was actually blessed by an actual indian priest when the school first opened back in 1953.
                  Last edited by DetDannyWilliams; 10-25-2013, 07:44 PM.

                  Comment

                  • The Jokeman
                    Registered User
                    • Dec 2003
                    • 9995

                    #10
                    Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                    Why not just rename them the Washington Reds?

                    Comment

                    • Mad Bomber
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 12927

                      #11
                      Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                      Originally posted by The Jokeman View Post
                      Why not just rename them the Washington Reds?
                      Too Republican. You may offend some Democrats.

                      Comment

                      • The Jokeman
                        Registered User
                        • Dec 2003
                        • 9995

                        #12
                        Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                        Originally posted by Mad Bomber View Post
                        Too Republican. You may offend some Democrats.
                        I'm a registered Independent and I could careless besides I don't hear people in Cincy complaining.
                        Last edited by The Jokeman; 10-25-2013, 08:10 PM.

                        Comment

                        • feldspar
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 13620

                          #13
                          Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                          Originally posted by The Jokeman View Post
                          Why not just rename them the Washington Reds?
                          Originally posted by Mad Bomber View Post
                          Too Republican. You may offend some Democrats.
                          Are you kidding?

                          Renaming them the Reds is purely communist, but who is worried about offending those rat bastards? LOL.

                          The yellows may feel left out, as well.

                          The whole thing is giving me the blues.

                          Comment

                          • feldspar
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 13620

                            #14
                            Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                            Originally posted by DetDannyWilliams View Post
                            We went through this with our name of our school Iroquois Chiefs and our mascot which was a Chief,...
                            so Kansas City is next...

                            Comment

                            • K-Gun
                              Deal with it
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 918

                              #15
                              Re: Washington Bravehearts?

                              I vote the Washington Warlords

                              the helmet could have a giant ready for launch
                              Last edited by K-Gun; 10-25-2013, 08:43 PM.
                              [W]e are busy that we may have leisure, and make war that we may live in peace...

                              [F]or no one chooses to be at war, or provokes war, for the sake of being at war; any one would seem absolutely murderous if he were to make enemies of his friends in order to bring about battle and slaughter...

                              - Aristotle

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X