WR is squarely on the need list

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • X-Era
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
    • Feb 2005
    • 27670

    WR is squarely on the need list

    I'd be just fine with taking one in the 1st round even.

    We have no legit #3 WR and certainly no legit outside presence opposite Woods if Stevie runs the slot.

    It's a need. I've seen too much garbage plays from Graham, Easley, and Goodwin.

    I'd like a bigger, faster WR like Marqise Lee or Sammy Watkins.

    No, it isn't out biggest need but It is absolutely a need.

  • Mr. Pink
    Peterman Sucks!
    • Mar 2006
    • 35303

    #2
    Re: WR is squarely on the need list

    We first need a legit QB to throw to a WR.

    Comment

    • TacklingDummy
      Unreachable Douche
      • Jul 2002
      • 71724

      #3
      Re: WR is squarely on the need list

      Originally posted by Mr. Pink View Post
      We first need a legit QB to throw to a WR.

      1st: QB
      1st: WR (for Byrd)
      2nd: CB

      Only problem with this is we wont draft Winston the following year.

      Comment

      • Novacane
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 42348

        #4
        Re: WR is squarely on the need list

        Until we have a QB nothing else matters

        Comment

        • X-Era
          What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
          • Feb 2005
          • 27670

          #5
          Re: WR is squarely on the need list

          Thanks for the hijack attempt guys. This thread is about the WR position.

          Comment

          • Mr. Pink
            Peterman Sucks!
            • Mar 2006
            • 35303

            #6
            Re: WR is squarely on the need list

            Originally posted by X-Era View Post
            Thanks for the hijack attempt guys. This thread is about the WR position.
            There's nothing wrong with the WRs, imo, when the top 3 guys are healthy.

            Stevie, Goodwin, Woods are plenty good enough when there's a QB who can get them the ball.

            How is a 4th WR squarely on the need list exactly?

            Comment

            • X-Era
              What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
              • Feb 2005
              • 27670

              #7
              Re: WR is squarely on the need list

              Originally posted by Mr. Pink View Post
              There's nothing wrong with the WRs, imo, when the top 3 guys are healthy.

              Stevie, Goodwin, Woods are plenty good enough when there's a QB who can get them the ball.

              How is a 4th WR squarely on the need list exactly?
              How is Goodwin proven to you as a solid WR? He looked really questionable just today and has done little to cement himself as a go to guy.

              Let's not assume that because he's better than Graham he's just fine... I don't see that.

              Comment

              • Mr. Pink
                Peterman Sucks!
                • Mar 2006
                • 35303

                #8
                Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                Originally posted by X-Era View Post
                How is Goodwin proven to you as a solid WR? He looked really questionable just today and has done little to cement himself as a go to guy.

                Let's not assume that because he's better than Graham he's just fine... I don't see that.
                There's two possession guys in Woods and Stevie...Stevie has shakey hands at times but he can get open whenever he wants to off the line. Then you have Goodwin to stretch the field and make big plays. What more do you really need?

                A tight end is more of a need than WR.

                Comment

                • Novacane
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 42348

                  #9
                  Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                  Originally posted by X-Era View Post
                  Thanks for the hijack attempt guys. This thread is about the WR position.

                  Woods and Goodwin have shown enough as rookies that I don't think it's a top need. A good QB would make them look even better

                  Comment

                  • TacklingDummy
                    Unreachable Douche
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 71724

                    #10
                    Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                    Originally posted by X-Era View Post
                    Thanks for the hijack attempt guys. This thread is about the WR position.
                    QB's make the WR's.

                    When you don't have a QB, you don't have a WR.

                    Comment

                    • X-Era
                      What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 27670

                      #11
                      Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                      Originally posted by TacklingDummy View Post
                      QB's make the WR's.

                      When you don't have a QB, you don't have a WR.
                      So, there were plenty of throws that hit the receivers in the hands today and were dropped.

                      Comment

                      • stuckincincy
                        Buffalo Bills Fan
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 15084

                        #12
                        Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                        Originally posted by TacklingDummy View Post
                        QB's make the WR's.

                        When you don't have a QB, you don't have a WR.
                        Bah.

                        If the 1st qb drafted, EJ, isn't injured and so can't become a rah-rah baby, BUF has 2 more wins.
                        Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

                        Comment

                        • IlluminatusUIUC
                          Registered User
                          • Sep 2012
                          • 8966

                          #13
                          Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                          Originally posted by Mr. Pink View Post
                          There's two possession guys in Woods and Stevie...Stevie has shakey hands at times but he can get open whenever he wants to off the line. Then you have Goodwin to stretch the field and make big plays. What more do you really need?

                          A tight end is more of a need than WR.
                          We need at least one big body guy for possession and red zone. Whether that is a tightend or WR is immaterial.


                          Billszone 2013 Prediction Contest winner!

                          Comment

                          • kingJofNYC
                            Registered User
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 5960

                            #14
                            Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                            WR/TE QB LB OL all needs. AKA Same **** different year

                            Comment

                            • BertSquirtgum
                              Registered User
                              • May 2009
                              • 13379

                              #15
                              Re: WR is squarely on the need list

                              Bills need a legit #1 because Steve is always hurt

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X