PDA

View Full Version : Article: Is Manuel The Future?



swiper
12-17-2013, 05:51 PM
I'm not usually a fan of this guy, but he seems to have hit it on the head. Especially the part he says he is not "wow'd" by Manuel. Like wagon said. He makes a few mundane throws and the QB-starved Bills fans seem to go nuts (paraphrasing)....


Bills Turn It Around
What to Think of Manuel?

by Tony Bogyo
December 17, 2013

I’m not normally a guy who bets on football, but I did see the betting line for the Bills this week – Bills favored by 2 points, on the road in Jacksonville. That kind of surprised me – Jacksonville’s defense ranked 19th against the pass and 30th while Buffalo’s offense is 29th in passing but 4th in rushing – looked to me that the Bills should have a sizable advantage running the ball. For its part, Jacksonville’s offense ranked 29th on the ground vs. the Bills 7th ranked rush defense and 26th ranked pass offense vs. Buffalo’s 6th ranked pass defense – again, noticeable advantage to Buffalo.


Going into the game the Jaguars were without Maurice Jones-Drew, their leading rusher, and Cecil Shorts, their leading receiver. Obviously this was a favorable matchup for the Bills.


Here’s the funny thing about betting lines – they’re not set to tell you who should win the game and by how much – they are set to balance the betting ledgers and even out the sides taken by the betting public. The lines didn’t say the Bills would win by two points – it said that half the bettors felt the Bills would win by 2 points and half felt they would not.


The betting line also tells me that no matter how favorable matchup the Bills have on paper, not too many people are high on a 4-9 football team on the road in December. Bettors usually aren’t stupid – they know the Bills are in their normal place this time of year – playing out the schedule with an eye on the draft. For me it seemed shocking – call me a homer, but in my view the Bills were destined to win by more than a lousy 2 points.


Betting line aside, Sunday’s game was eye-opening. There’s nothing left to play for this year – I’m watching for next year already – I suspect most fans are in the same boat. I’m not quite sure what to make of what I saw, but I have some deep concerns.


Anyone watching EJ Manuel at the start of the game probably also has concerns about the future of the Bills. Far from showing progress and maturity, Manuel was terrible and terrible isn’t even a strong enough term. Manuel looked absolutely lost and overwhelmed early in the game. His reads were slow and his passes off target. He missed a wide open T.J. Graham on a key third down by throwing a ball that didn’t even reach the receiver on the first hop. The Bills first drive went 4 plays for 1 yard and ended in a field goal courtesy of an interception to start the drive in excellent field position.


The second Bills drive featured a Manuel fumble that went out of bounds and a 12 yard run by the quarterback who was flushed out of the pocket and had no other options. It ended in a terrible interception – Manuel threw a screen pass that looked like a dump-off to a Jaguars player.


The running game was similarly flat. C.J. Spiller came out with his signature run – take 2 strides towards the line of scrimmage, make a cut and either bounce off an offensive lineman or get stuffed by the defense after a loss or short gain. Fred Jackson did not fare much better.


On their third possession the Bills put together a drive that resulted in no points as Dan Carpenter missed a 54 yard field goal. On the first drive of the second quarter the Bills went 3 and out and racked up -9 yards when Manuel was sacked twice.


We all remember years past when the Bills had no offense of which to speak – games would go by without a touchdown and moving the ball seemed like an incredible task. The start of Sunday’s game was like those past years – whatever the Bills did offensively just didn’t work – they went nowhere.


I sat and watched in stunned silence – if this is what Buffalo is going to look like in the future the team is in deep trouble. We can’t go back to the days of Trent Edwards getting sacked and checking down passes that gain nothing. We can’t go back to Ryan Fitzpatrick’s wild inaccuracies and missing open receivers, especially in key situations. We can’t go back to having running backs continually running into a brick wall every time they take a handoff.


I know Manuel is a rookie and I know he’s struggled on the road, but he showed nothing beside some quick feet early in Sunday’s game. Seeing such poor play makes me question whether He can develop into the quarterback Buffalo needs. The organization seems committed to Manuel, but how long does that continue? Do they pass up premium quarterback talent in the draft if it’s available because they are convinced they already have their man?


I have to admit, I’m puzzled about Buffalo’s evaluation of quarterback talent. I have no idea why, of all the quarterbacks with the Bills this season, Jeff Tuel is still on the roster when the team has all but admitted he’s incapable of leading the team in a game. The Bills got rid of Matt Flynn and you may have seen him tear up the Cowboys on Sunday – you’re telling me he wasn’t good enough to be a backup in Buffalo?


OK, things didn’t end that badly on Sunday. Manuel turned his game around and was very efficient for two and a half quarters. As a matter of fact, while he’s not going to win AFC Player of the Week, he did finish with a quarterback rating of 105. The running game got going and finished with almost 200 yards rushing. The Bills won the game 27-20.


I hope we’ve seen Manuel and the Bills offense at the worst – I’m not sure I could stomach anything much uglier than what I saw in the first quarter on Sunday. Against a better team and the Bills would have been in a huge hole with play like that.


I guess what really bothers me is that I have to see a game where Manuel really wows me. He’s looked poised, he’s looked efficient and he’s looked in control, but I haven’t seen the highlight plays I want to see. I want to see Manuel make the type of throws where only his receiver can catch the ball – the throws good quarterbacks make. I want to see some of those perfect throws, perfectly threaded or with the perfect touch. I want to see better downfield throws – Buffalo has the speed receivers to make the deep ball work, but the throws have to be there or it doesn’t matter. Wow me and games like Sunday’s are forgotten.


It’ll be interesting to see how Manuel plays this week. Miami is a quality opponent, but Manuel will have the home crowd cheering him on. It’s time to see what the rookie can do – the future is now and the quicker we can determine whether Manuel’s the man to lead the Bills to the next level the better.

http://www.billsdaily.com/articles/bogyo/2013/jaxrecap.shtml

How long are you going to wait to be wow'd?

Mr. Pink
12-17-2013, 05:55 PM
Some people will wait forever and when the organization finally moves on from him they'll make excuses that Manuel got a bum rap. There's still people who think Losman was great and got the shaft here. Same will happen with Manuel.

SpikedLemonade
12-17-2013, 06:02 PM
What exactly are are options right now?

I am willing to be patient for next season but I am willing to consider other options including drafting a QB in the 1st round and signing the most sought after FA QB.

If we were drafting top 5 and we can snag an elite QB, I would be willing.

I just don't think it will happen.

coastal
12-17-2013, 06:16 PM
First pick overall... try again.

YardRat
12-17-2013, 06:21 PM
I'm willing to give a rookie QB with a rookie HC and rookie OC more than 10 games, I know that much.

SquishDaFish
12-17-2013, 06:45 PM
I'm willing to give a rookie QB with a rookie HC and rookie OC more than 10 games, I know that much.

My point exactly. I dont care about the past with this organization right now. We finally seen our team take a QB in the 1st whom seems to have the potential. We have to at least give that more than the first year.

Skooby
12-17-2013, 07:08 PM
First pick overall... try again.

I wouldn't even hesitate doing this, let EJ have some competition at QB versus the scrubs he had this past season. I bet we see another injury again & then the reality sets in that EJ's a glass tiger.

starrymessenger
12-17-2013, 10:19 PM
This week's game should be interesting. Too bad it's blacked out. My service provider says I can't see it even with NFL ticket if it's blacked out locally.
Anyway Fins have everything to play for and are on a roll after dumping NE.
Bills are healthy and are at home.
Good fight brewing. No excuses.

starrymessenger
12-17-2013, 10:29 PM
Somewhat dated and has probably been posted before, but IMO still relevant. From TomahawkNation.


"On the morning of the first round, I present to you two opinions on EJ Manuel and the NFL, from our two main film breakdown guys: Alan Mundy and myself. We've watched every snap of his career, the majority of them multiple times. Here is Alan's take:


In order to make any kind of assessment of EJ Manuel's pro prospects, there has to be a clear understanding of where he is as a quarterback at the end of his college career. In all the attributes that one would look for in a potential NFL quarterback (footwork, mechanics, accuracy, ability to read a defense, pocket movement/escapability, running ability, etc. etc.)


EJ has demonstrated high levels of proficiency at times. He has also displayed levels of inconsistency at even the fundamental aspects of quarterback play that raise serious questions about his ultimate ceiling as a QB. The frustrating part of these inconsistencies is that they are so very inconsistent and appear seemingly at random. For a coach trying to address these issues it must feel like a game of whack-a-mole; as soon as you resolve one deficiency, another that you thought you had fixed reappears. This suggests a quarterback who has not sufficiently mastered the fundamental aspects of the position to the point that they happen automatically.


If EJ is thinking about footwork, then mechanics go to hell. If he starts to think about mechanics and footwork, then he forgets to make a necessary pass protection check, etc. etc. While I do not know EJ on a personal level, I would feel very comfortable stating as fact that he is a very intelligent person and a very hard worker. Further, he has been coached by an excellent QB coach for five years. Given that there are no suspected issues with work ethic or lack of quality coaching, EJ's inconsistency presents a problem that I don't think can be waved away with the notion that Jimbo Fisher's coaching style didn't mesh with EJ. The question an NFL team has to answer for themselves when deciding where to draft EJ is whether he is simply a late bloomer who develops at a slower rate than others (certainly possible), or whether he has limited aptitude for the position.


A big factor in EJ's success or lack thereof as a pro will be the circumstances around him, the ability of the coaching staff to fit their coaching style to him, and EJ's ability to overcome a couple of critical mental blocks he seems to have developed.


Whatever the cause, EJ has shown a clear reluctance to use one of his best attributes: his legs. He must be willing and eager to run on designed plays and when the opportunity presents itself on called pass plays. His running ability is the bridge that will allow him to be effective while developing as a passer.


It is also my opinion that EJ is the type of person who wants to succeed and please his coaches to the point that he internalizes and personalizes criticism that is meant to be situational and related to his play, not his worth as a person. His coaching staff must recognize this and be careful not to destroy the relationship before it has a chance to develop. EJ must grow as well and learn to take coaching without allowing it to turn into a negative internal monologue. His coaches and teammates are all heavily invested in his success. There is no next level to be concerned about anymore.


Ultimately, given the likelihood that he will be drafted high and forced to play early, I am skeptical that EJ will develop quickly enough to become a highly successful starter but I am certainly rooting for him to do so and wish him all the best.
I will not rehash most of Alan's thoughts, but will comment on anything with which I disagree, and offer some thoughts that Alan did not mention.


Manuel has big, big tools. He has the build at 6'5 and 230 pounds. He has the eye-popping combine numbers at that weight. He's shown that he has the arm strength to play in the NFL. His play-fakes are excellent. And no quarterback in this draft has his ability to take it the distance with his legs. All of the physical tools are there.


Alan notes that there is a possibility that Manuel could be a late bloomer, or that a change of coach could make the difference. I can't dismiss either possibility. There is great variance in projecting players from college to the NFL, and Manuel certainly has some very attractive tools.


And Manuel has absolutely killed the interview and media circuit leading up to the draft. Everyone with whom he speaks comes away stating that they want him as the face of their franchise. They're right. Manuel never got into trouble at Florida State and always said the right thing. His off-field risk is about as good as anyone in this draft. He's clean cut, and a hard worker.


But that doesn't win football games.


I would not draft EJ Manuel with a top-50 pick. Someone will, of course, because they think they can be the one to take those tools and bring out the superstar player. His play on the field at Florida State was that of a third- or fourth-rounder. His team had a talent advantage over almost all opponents, and that helped to hide some of his flaws. He was a fine college quarterback whose numbers are better than his play.


I am considerably more likely to subscribe to the upside angle when a player is young or inexperienced. Manuel is 23. That's not at all young for a QB coming out of college. And he's not inexperienced. He's had almost 1,000 passing plays in his Florida State career.


I have a few major issues with Manuel that Alan touched on, but on which I want to expand.


I think Manuel is very physically tough. He played through a fractured leg in the bowl game against Notre Dame and came back in after sustaining what I personally believe to have been a concussion against Florida (FSU denied that he had a concussion, but he was definitely off when I interviewed him after the game, and that is a discussion for another day).


But for every bit of physical toughness he has, he has an equal amount of mental softness on the field. I want to be clear here that I am not at all making a judgment of Manuel's mental toughness in life, but rather solely as it relates to football. From the complete inability to take hard coaching to worrying and complaining about what the press writes, there are serious concerns here. Too many times he's gone into a shell or broken down when being coached hard, leading to him not absorbing the instruction that follows the hard coaching. He's never had the "[screw] you" attitude that top quarterbacks all possess. While Manuel does say all the right things outwardly, I've never had the impression from team sources that he's a great leader of his teammates. Whichever team takes Manuel is going to have to be very careful with how it handles his fragile psyche.


I also somewhat disagree with Alan about Manuel's intelligence. I don't think he's dumb by any means, but I think he's more hard worker than savant; although that's not necessarily a bad thing.


Manuel's long legs give me concern. He struggles to take the short, choppy steps that are required to move around in the pocket. He also has much better long speed than he does quickness, which hurts his ability to escape the rush and quickly scramble to pick up yards. Manuel's highlight tape contains some very impressive runs, and once he gets going he is very good at picking up yards in the open field. But his acceleration isn't great, and for being such a great athlete, his ability to avoid pressure was sorely lacking. How often does a quarterback run 40 yards in the NFL? It's a cool skill, but the greater skill, and one that Manuel doesn't seem to have, is the ability to consistently avoid pressure, avoid losing yards, and pick up first downs.


Of course, that is if he runs at all. Manuel changed as an upperclassman at Florida State. He ran a ton in 2009 and 2010, both on designed runs, read options and scrambles. It made him very dangerous, and inspired a lot of hope from Florida State fans. But something changed, seemingly after the 2011 Oklahoma game in which Manuel separated his shoulder: he stopped running. There's a lot of debate about this. Was it his desire to shed the dual-threat label often applied to African-American quarterbacks? Was it his desire to avoid injury and preserve himself for the draft? Was it head coach Jimbo Fisher telling him not to run? Was it assistant coach Dameyune Craig instructing him to do so? There's no absolute answer here. What we do know, however, is that Fisher continued to call read options, and Manuel all of a sudden ran them incorrectly at an alarming rate. This skill that he possessed in 2009 and 2010 -- one that is executed properly in middle school football, was suddenly gone. Paired with recent comments from his teammates about his desire to establish himself as a pocket passer, it raises questions about whether Manuel was refusing to run those plays correctly. Ultimately, Manuel kept himself healthy and he is about to get paid a lot of money.


Will Manuel run in the NFL? If so, how much? Will he do it only in the beginning? If he is close to his second contract, will he sell out for his team, or stop running and try to avoid injury? These are questions an NFL team must ask, because if he did it to Florida State, he could do it to your NFL team. And the running is so important because Manuel is really not much of an NFL prospect as a pure pocket passer.


The reasons for this are many. He really doesn't have a good feel for the game. Manuel is very slow to recognize and react on the field. He doesn't recognize blitzes well, doesn't sense pressure (making it too late to use his athleticism to avoid it), is often slow to get through his reads, and struggles to read coverage in general, both pre and post-snap.


FSU had to dumb down its offense a lot for Manuel, as Alan and I have noted many times when people claimed it was too complicated. The reason for this, IMO, is because of his lack of mental ability on the field. But don't take my word for it. Here is Mike Mayock, head scout for the NFL Network:


Mayock, who also appeared at the charity event, said his endorsement of Manuel as the class' second-best quarterback stems from his overall frustration in trying to evaluate the overall talent of a class that several league officials have said lacks a no-brainer.


"I finally got to the point where I said, ‘If I'm going to make a mistake on a late-one, mid-two [round] kind of quarterback, I'm gonna do it on an athlete with size and arm talent,'" Mayock said.


"And as for me, E.J. Manuel didn't get asked to do a lot [at Florida State], and I don't think you can ding the kid. A lot of people say, ‘Oh, can he read defenses?' But I don't think they asked him to do it a lot. So we don't really know that.


"I think he's a big kid with upside and arm talent. If the Eagles jumped on him in the second round, I think he'd be a great fit."
[Emphasis mine] Mayock says that FSU didn't ask Manuel to do much, but from my perspective, the reason behind this is important: he never demonstrated that he could handle more.


Manuel also struggles to throw with anticipation. The next time he bangs the post route before the receiver breaks open will be the first. He is very much a rudimentary "see it, throw it" player. That doesn't work well in the NFL. In the league, certain routes demand that the ball comes out before the receiver is open or out of his break.


Throwing with anticipation and the ability to quickly recognize and react to things happening on the field aren't physical tools, but rather are the power cords attached to the physical tools. Without them, the tools don't matter all that much.


The questions NFL teams must ask are 1) how much of the above is coach-able and fixable, and 2) How much will Manuel loosen up and just play once he gets a paycheck and a new coach?


Each coach will have a different opinion on the subject, and the one who thinks he can make Manuel's physical tools into a quality NFL starter will be the one who drafts him in the first two rounds. I believe Manuel would be better served to sit the bench for a few years while learning, but suspect that he'll be drafted too high for that to be a possibility.


I'll be rooting for him. He was always interesting to cover, and continues to be a great representative of Florida State."

WagonCircler
12-17-2013, 11:45 PM
^^^^ EPIC analysis ^^^^^

DraftBoy
12-18-2013, 06:03 AM
^^^^ EPIC analysis ^^^^^

With a tinge of bias. Many FSU fans are salty about EJ (especially give the success of Winston this year). TN is no different, while I think the analysis is very good and Bud Elliott is one of my favorite SBNation writers to read you can't forget where its coming from. He does touch on some thing that we are still seeing now however and those center around the slow development of reads, progressions, and plays. The Bills seem to be going with a 1 or 2 read concept which is interesting, but not ideal for what Marrone/Hackett want to run with its package play offense.

Some games EJ feels like he is getting the offense, understanding the concepts, and seeing the whole field, but in others he looks stuck in the mud, frustrated, and like he is helpless. Its been a long year for EJ and he'll have all of next one to show growth but the chips are not stacked in his favor.

Historian
12-18-2013, 06:17 AM
I'm willing to give a rookie QB with a rookie HC and rookie OC more than 10 games, I know that much.

As usual, Rat is the voice of reason.

If we are seeing the same type of erratic play at this point next year, then these threads are appropriate.

Right now, they're written out of boredom.

Fix the line....and you will fix Manuel.

jamze132
12-18-2013, 06:24 AM
I can only hope he shows some development in the next two games as they are against teams he will be playing against for the next 3-10+ years, depending on his sucess.

Mike13
12-18-2013, 09:48 AM
He seems to be having an average rookie year.

k-oneputt
12-18-2013, 10:45 AM
That analysis is spot on imo.

That is what I saw from him at FSU and what I still see.

WagonCircler
12-18-2013, 10:49 AM
As usual, Rat is the voice of reason.

If we are seeing the same type of erratic play at this point next year, then these threads are appropriate..

Except for the fact that we are seeing the exact same problems here that are catalogued in perfect detail in the piece that starry posted about EJs time at FSU.

I'm all for keeping him and letting him compete with a guy picked in the first round next year. But between his seemingly unfixable flaws and his knees, I'd like to shorten the transition period. Because it's definitely coming.

WagonCircler
12-18-2013, 10:54 AM
With a tinge of bias. Many FSU fans are salty about EJ (especially give the success of Winston this year). TN is no different, while I think the analysis is very good and Bud Elliott is one of my favorite SBNation writers to read you can't forget where its coming from.

Familiarity breeds contempt. The piece is a detailed explanation of EJs tragic flaws. You can't struggle so badly for so long with mechanics and hope to master the complexities or reading NFL Defenses. It's like trying to learn algebra while taking trigonometry.

The mechanics should have been second nature to him long ago.

DynaPaul
12-18-2013, 10:56 AM
No one knows him better than the authors of that article. Sorry people...

Skooby
12-18-2013, 11:17 AM
He's lacking basic skills which really hinder his development at this level, it's time to find a new Savior.

EDS
12-18-2013, 11:28 AM
Multiple injuries in college. Multiple injuries in the pros.

Skooby
12-18-2013, 11:32 AM
Multiple injuries in college. Multiple injuries in the pros.
Glass tiger.

YardRat
12-19-2013, 05:02 AM
Mechanics can be fixed, especially if the offensive line is strengthened.
So can accuracy, again with better protection, and with increasing familiarity with the receivers.
The offense can be tailored over time to fit his strengths and weaknesses, both physical and intellectual.
Pocket awareness can also be tempered, as his ability to read defenses and pass rushes (hopefully) improves.
Injuries can be a concern, but consider Jim Kelly (and I'm certainly not comparing the two at this point) played a full 16 game slate in only four of eleven seasons. Even taking out the two he sat because home field was already clinched, he still missed games due to injury in over half of them.
If nothing else, the kid has shown an ability to lead, and produce, at critical times when the game is on the line.

Every QB struggles at times during games, even the great ones. When a rookie blows for the first quarter and a half but still wins, it's 'cause for concern'. When a proven vet does it, he's praised for gutting it out, overcoming the slow start, and still leading his team to victory. The difference between the two analysis is the proven vets have established themselves, so they get the benefit of the doubt, and it's rare for a young QB to be able to get to that point in 10 games, unless they are already the beneficiary of a dominant defense, a good running game, and a strong offensive line (see Big Ben, Wilson, etc).

pmoon6
12-19-2013, 05:26 AM
Familiarity breeds contempt. The piece is a detailed explanation of EJs tragic flaws. You can't struggle so badly for so long with mechanics and hope to master the complexities or reading NFL Defenses. It's like trying to learn algebra while taking trigonometry.

The mechanics should have been second nature to him long ago.And impatience breeds kneejerk reactions.

Lets look at what the Bills' had planned for him. They picked up Kolb to be the starter so E.J. could be groomed for a year. Mayock said in his draft analysis that Manuel was a raw talent and would need work. Unfortunately, that didn't happen, so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt with regard to this season. Draft a QB in the third round since the position is supposed to be deep in this draft. I go OLB and OL in the first two rounds baring any free agent signings.

pmoon6
12-19-2013, 05:28 AM
Glass tiger.Bwahahahaha.

Historian
12-19-2013, 08:44 AM
First off, you have to give him one more full year. Anything else is silly.

One thing that intrigues me about the QB situation is this:

Edwards, Fitz, Holcomb, maybe Losman seemed decent out of the gate. (Especially Trent)

Then something happened. For Trent it was the hit in Arizona...then their games went to ****.

EJ is kinda the opposite. Started out slow, has shown some signs of getting it.

I'm hoping he's the anti-Edwards, and continues to grow into the position.

Either way, he has to have another year, minimum.

BuffRanger
12-19-2013, 09:29 AM
He's not a future Hall of Famer. He is better than anything the Bills have had since Flutie. He's not good enough that the Bills should stop looking. If they finish high enough and can get good one in the 1st round they should.

better days
12-19-2013, 09:40 AM
Well, I want to see EJ go into Foxboro & beat the Pats* for their third loss in a row.

stuckincincy
12-19-2013, 11:13 AM
Well, I want to see EJ go into Foxboro & beat the Pats* for their third loss in a row.

:jig:

GvilleBills
12-19-2013, 11:26 AM
And impatience breeds kneejerk reactions.

Lets look at what the Bills' had planned for him. They picked up Kolb to be the starter so E.J. could be groomed for a year. Mayock said in his draft analysis that Manuel was a raw talent and would need work. Unfortunately, that didn't happen, so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt with regard to this season. Draft a QB in the third round since the position is supposed to be deep in this draft. I go OLB and OL in the first two rounds baring any free agent signings.

Moonie, I'm not so sure that was the plan. If they truly wanted to groom him for a year (IMO, exactly what EJ needed), then you never get rid of TJax. When they cut the QB who was looking the best in OTAs, best suited to run a similar system as EJ, and is a legit tough SOB (less likely EJ is pushed into action as a result of injury) it smelled fishy to me. Installing the TinMan as the only challenge to the "Face of the Franchise" seems like they wanted KneeJ on the field sooner than later.

- - - Updated - - -


:jig:
That is a disturbing ass quote in your sig dude.

colin
12-19-2013, 11:38 AM
his performance in college, the pros, and his getting hurt so much don't combine for a promising picture. i will be pleasantly shocked if he turns out to be anything close to good.

stuckincincy
12-19-2013, 12:10 PM
Moonie, I'm not so sure that was the plan. If they truly wanted to groom him for a year (IMO, exactly what EJ needed), then you never get rid of TJax. When they cut the QB who was looking the best in OTAs, best suited to run a similar system as EJ, and is a legit tough SOB (less likely EJ is pushed into action as a result of injury) it smelled fishy to me. Installing the TinMan as the only challenge to the "Face of the Franchise" seems like they wanted KneeJ on the field sooner than later.

- - - Updated - - -


That is a disturbing ass quote in your sig dude.

Indeed.

justasportsfan
12-19-2013, 01:04 PM
I'm willing to give a rookie QB with a rookie HC and rookie OC more than 10 games, I know that much.

I agree with this but so far I am starting to wonder how high the ceiling is for EJ. I don't see signs of greatness at all. So far he's looking like he could be as good as Jason Campbell. Maybe.

stuckincincy
12-19-2013, 01:08 PM
Somewhat dated and has probably been posted before, but IMO still relevant. From TomahawkNation.



You will get this site sued if you quote complete articles.

TacklingDummy
12-19-2013, 03:22 PM
I agree with this but so far I am starting to wonder how high the ceiling is for EJ. I don't see signs of greatness at all. So far he's looking like he could be as good as Jason Campbell. Maybe.

Cellars have ceilings?

I hope the kid proves me wrong. He seems like an intelligent nice man.

better days
12-19-2013, 04:47 PM
Cellars have ceilings?

I hope the kid proves me wrong. He seems like an intelligent nice man.

Yes Cellars have ceilings, but most of them are LOW.

EJ has all the intangibles you could ask for in a QB as well as the tangibles.

I hope he proves you wrong as well. I'm sure you would not mind eating some crow if that is the case.

Skooby
12-19-2013, 06:55 PM
Yes Cellars have ceilings, but most of them are LOW.

EJ has all the intangibles you could ask for in a QB as well as the tangibles.

I hope he proves you wrong as well. I'm sure you would not mind eating some crow if that is the case.

None of us would, how about the ability to drop back without an imbalance ? Is this too much to ask?

DraftBoy
12-19-2013, 07:33 PM
Familiarity breeds contempt. The piece is a detailed explanation of EJs tragic flaws. You can't struggle so badly for so long with mechanics and hope to master the complexities or reading NFL Defenses. It's like trying to learn algebra while taking trigonometry.

The mechanics should have been second nature to him long ago.

You're wording would indicate that he's sucked for so long, which isn't true.

Agreed.

He certainly needs a specific scenario in which to succeed the question is can we provide that for him.

TacklingDummy
12-19-2013, 08:06 PM
Familiarity breeds contempt. The piece is a detailed explanation of EJs tragic flaws. You can't struggle so badly for so long with mechanics and hope to master the complexities or reading NFL Defenses. It's like trying to learn algebra while taking trigonometry.

The mechanics should have been second nature to him long ago.

Post of the day

:clap:

gr8slayer
12-19-2013, 08:30 PM
It's pointless to even ask this at this point. Anyone who claims to know whether or not he's the future is kidding themselves, it's way too early to tell. Let's revisit the topic in two more years.

Skooby
12-19-2013, 09:30 PM
It's pointless to even ask this at this point. Anyone who claims to know whether or not he's the future is kidding themselves, it's way too early to tell. Let's revisit the topic in two more years.

Can the QB drop back 5 steps without being off-balance?

WagonCircler
12-19-2013, 10:34 PM
You're wording would indicate that he's sucked for so long, which isn't true.

Agreed.

He certainly needs a specific scenario in which to succeed the question is can we provide that for him.

If you take my comments out of context, they do.

But the reality is, my response was specific to how familiar the writer of the piece is with EJ and for how long.

And his point is that EJ is still having the same inexplicable mechanics breakdowns that he has always had. Additionally, he maintains that a young QB can't progress until the mechanics are second nature--something I've posted here repeatedly.

You can't be going through the mental checklist about setting your feet right, throwing off your front foot, coming over the top with your release, generating torque with your wrist, shoulders and hips in the proper sequence, etc., while reading and analyzing Defenses and making snap judgements. All in tenths of seconds.

You can see by the playcalling that they're trying to provide the specific scenario that you mentioned, but, as we painfully saw in the Tampa game, it's not hard to figure out.

The Bills beat Jacksonville despite EJ, not because of him.

The analysis that starrymessenger posted is dead-on.

QBs have bad stretches, but great QBs never look like EJ did in the first quarter last Sunday. He's a one-step-up two-steps-back guy.

WagonCircler
12-19-2013, 10:36 PM
It's pointless to even ask this at this point. Anyone who claims to know whether or not he's the future is kidding themselves, it's way too early to tell. Let's revisit the topic in two more years.

Sure, but when you read things about a guy written last year buy guys who know what they're talking about and who watched every college game the guy ever played, and you see that QB struggling mightily with EXACTLY the same things, it doesn't bode well for the future.

Frenchman
12-19-2013, 10:57 PM
Well injuries could be a red flag in the future. As hope he can put those behind!

BertSquirtgum
12-20-2013, 12:17 AM
his performance in college, the pros, and his getting hurt so much don't combine for a promising picture. i will be pleasantly shocked if he turns out to be anything close to good.

Horse****. I think he sucks but he wasn't hurt a lot in college. He injured his shoulder landing awkard after being tackled and missed two games. That was one time. He had a broken index finger in 2009 but only missed practice time in the spring. He wasn't even the starter in 2009.

YardRat
12-20-2013, 05:35 AM
If you take my comments out of context, they do.

But the reality is, my response was specific to how familiar the writer of the piece is with EJ and for how long.

And his point is that EJ is still having the same inexplicable mechanics breakdowns that he has always had. Additionally, he maintains that a young QB can't progress until the mechanics are second nature--something I've posted here repeatedly.

You can't be going through the mental checklist about setting your feet right, throwing off your front foot, coming over the top with your release, generating torque with your wrist, shoulders and hips in the proper sequence, etc., while reading and analyzing Defenses and making snap judgements. All in tenths of seconds.

You can see by the playcalling that they're trying to provide the specific scenario that you mentioned, but, as we painfully saw in the Tampa game, it's not hard to figure out.

The Bills beat Jacksonville despite EJ, not because of him.

The analysis that starrymessenger posted is dead-on.

QBs have bad stretches, but great QBs never look like EJ did in the first quarter last Sunday. He's a one-step-up two-steps-back guy.

No offense, but much of this post is BS.

Almost every QB's mechanics suffer when the game is going too fast for them, or they aren't correctly reading defenses. It takes experience, and good protection, to assist the development of that part of a QB's game. Granted, they have to get through the mental checklist, but getting to that point is a process, and that process is made more difficult facing different looks every week.

EJ most certainly contributed to the win, especially late in the second half, and also late in the game to lead his team to the go-ahead score when the game was still in the balance.

Great QB's do look like **** for stretches...sometimes entire games...ask Brady and Flacco how well they played when the Bills picked them off four or five times and won.

Skooby
12-20-2013, 06:51 AM
No offense, but much of this post is BS.

Almost every QB's mechanics suffer when the game is going too fast for them, or they aren't correctly reading defenses. It takes experience, and good protection, to assist the development of that part of a QB's game. Granted, they have to get through the mental checklist, but getting to that point is a process, and that process is made more difficult facing different looks every week.

EJ most certainly contributed to the win, especially late in the second half, and also late in the game to lead his team to the go-ahead score when the game was still in the balance.

Great QB's do look like **** for stretches...sometimes entire games...ask Brady and Flacco how well they played when the Bills picked them off four or five times and won.

EJ looks unbalanced all the time, like a lanky broad in high-heels.

pmoon6
12-20-2013, 07:03 AM
EJ looks unbalanced all the time, like a lanky broad in high-heels.And how would you know anything about "Broads"?

Skooby
12-20-2013, 07:15 AM
And how would you know anything about "Broads"?

I watch TV in the prison rec hall.

pmoon6
12-20-2013, 07:24 AM
I watch TV in the prison rec hall.Is that in between fulfilling your ***** duties for Big Bubba?

better days
12-20-2013, 07:44 AM
If you take my comments out of context, they do.

But the reality is, my response was specific to how familiar the writer of the piece is with EJ and for how long.

And his point is that EJ is still having the same inexplicable mechanics breakdowns that he has always had. Additionally, he maintains that a young QB can't progress until the mechanics are second nature--something I've posted here repeatedly.

You can't be going through the mental checklist about setting your feet right, throwing off your front foot, coming over the top with your release, generating torque with your wrist, shoulders and hips in the proper sequence, etc., while reading and analyzing Defenses and making snap judgements. All in tenths of seconds.

You can see by the playcalling that they're trying to provide the specific scenario that you mentioned, but, as we painfully saw in the Tampa game, it's not hard to figure out.

The Bills beat Jacksonville despite EJ, not because of him.

The analysis that starrymessenger posted is dead-on.

QBs have bad stretches, but great QBs never look like EJ did in the first quarter last Sunday. He's a one-step-up two-steps-back guy.

Well, Eli Manning has won two Superbowls.

BUT this year, he has only 16 TD's & 25 INT's a rating of 69.7 for the year.

Eli has looked every bit as bad as EJ did in the first qtr of the Jags game at times this year.

bills_7
12-20-2013, 08:03 AM
I'm surprised there's not more talk of Thad Lewis having potential to be the future or even just a starter he's looked better then Manuel. After this week when he has a great game I bet the talks will pick up. He's only 26. I know he has some faults but his seem easier to fix then ejs. I feel like when Lewis is out there anything can happen, almost like flutie, when ej is out there I feel like we have to dink and dunk all the way down field, anyone else feel like this?

Skooby
12-20-2013, 08:10 AM
Is that in between fulfilling your ***** duties for Big Bubba?

I am Big Bubba.

pmoon6
12-20-2013, 08:37 AM
I am Big Bubba.:rofl:

Historian
12-20-2013, 09:12 AM
Is that in between fulfilling your ***** duties for Big Bubba?

There you go with the gay thing again....

justasportsfan
12-20-2013, 09:14 AM
Mechanics can be fixed, especially if the offensive line is strengthened.
So can accuracy, again with better protection, and with increasing familiarity with the receivers.


Tebow was hoping this was true.

Maybe EJ will learn to be accurate making easy throws he usually misses under pressure 5-10 yards out to SJ, Chandler,etc.

I worry that he won't ever learn to make throws in tight windows under pressure needed in playoff games.

Skooby
12-20-2013, 04:29 PM
Tebow was hoping this was true.

Maybe EJ will learn to be accurate making easy throws he usually misses under pressure 5-10 yards out to SJ, Chandler,etc.

I worry that he won't ever learn to make throws in tight windows under pressure needed in playoff games.

Playoff games?

Mike
12-21-2013, 06:06 PM
I'm willing to give a rookie QB with a rookie HC and rookie OC more than 10 games, I know that much.


Your using quantitative measures to justify your position. To me it's all qualitative; regardless of who his coach is, team, and opponent EJ still has a hard time hitting an open WR on a 5yard out. He doesn't make those 'it' plays, instead he misses wide open WR. To me, at best he will be serviceable but he is no Russell Wilson, Luck, etc.

Mike
12-21-2013, 06:27 PM
Mechanics can be fixed, especially if the offensive line is strengthened.
So can accuracy, again with better protection, and with increasing familiarity with the receivers.
The offense can be tailored over time to fit his strengths and weaknesses, both physical and intellectual.
Pocket awareness can also be tempered, as his ability to read defenses and pass rushes (hopefully) improves.
Injuries can be a concern, but consider Jim Kelly (and I'm certainly not comparing the two at this point) played a full 16 game slate in only four of eleven seasons. Even taking out the two he sat because home field was already clinched, he still missed games due to injury in over half of them.
If nothing else, the kid has shown an ability to lead, and produce, at critical times when the game is on the line.

Every QB struggles at times during games, even the great ones. When a rookie blows for the first quarter and a half but still wins, it's 'cause for concern'. When a proven vet does it, he's praised for gutting it out, overcoming the slow start, and still leading his team to victory. The difference between the two analysis is the proven vets have established themselves, so they get the benefit of the doubt, and it's rare for a young QB to be able to get to that point in 10 games, unless they are already the beneficiary of a dominant defense, a good running game, and a strong offensive line (see Big Ben, Wilson, etc).

You can't compare Wilson or Big Ben to EJ. In his very first game, Wilson made plays, took his team on his shoulders and almost won it. Big Ben went 15-0. Those players made plays, they anticipated and created as rookies. Conversely, EJ has a hard time hitting open receivers.

Skooby
12-21-2013, 06:41 PM
Conversely, EJ has a hard time hitting open receivers.

The sideline cheerleaders were told to keep an eye out on his overthrows.

gr8slayer
12-21-2013, 07:27 PM
Well, I've watched every game of his college and pro career, and I think that he has a great upside, but there's no doubt that he's a project. Quite frankly, the Bills aren't currently built to support a rookie QB, no matter who it is. Also, he never should have had to start from day one. Unfortunately, Kolb went down, and hew as forced into a role that he wasn't ready for.
Sure, but when you read things about a guy written last year buy guys who know what they're talking about and who watched every college game the guy ever played, and you see that QB struggling mightily with EXACTLY the same things, it doesn't bode well for the future.

alohabillsfan
12-22-2013, 10:19 AM
Sorry to say, but all of you willing to give home another year or two will be waiting that much longer to make the playoffs!