Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

[Raptor]

I mean it's not even close, Watkins is getting doubled and tripled and killing it and Mike Evans can barely get separation. If we are taking a WR in the first it's Watkins or nobody

[Skooby]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Are you on the BBMB as well with this ?

[X-Era]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

I think there is little chance he will be there at 9. If he is, he should be the pick.

[tomz]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Very impressive play by Watkins. He has half decent size as well.

[X-Era]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

I mean it's not even close, Watkins is getting doubled and tripled and killing it and Mike Evans can barely get separation. If we are taking a WR in the first it's Watkins or nobody

I'm not as big a fan of Evans as some are. But, don't sleep on Marqise Lee and Donte Moncrief... Especially Moncrief.

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Just say no to midget wide revivers.
This isn't the 1980s Fun Bunch Redskins wide reciver league anymore.

[X-Era]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Just say no to midget wide revivers.
This isn't the 1980s Fun Bunch Redskins wide reciver league anymore.

Midget?

Watkins is 6' 0" 1/2 and 205 lbs.

[Skooby]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Midget?

Watkins is 6' 0" 1/2 and 205 lbs.

A shot caller.

[X-Era]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Watkins, with 800+ yards after the catch this year is ideal for an up tempo, quick throw to shorter routes game.

Right now, I think he's in play at 2 to STL, 3 to Oak, and 7 to TB.

I think if he gets by Oak, you would probably have to move to 6 to get him. 3 spots for us.

[kingJofNYC]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Watkins is a beast, unfortunately for us he's going to be gone by 9.

And Sammy Watkins may not be "big" but he plays big. Tough as nails, will run around you or through you, loves contact, he's no softy. Would love him on this, unfortunately he won't be there. One can hope though...

[Mouldsie]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Just say no to midget wide revivers.
This isn't the 1980s Fun Bunch Redskins wide reciver league anymore.

James Hardy > DeSean Jackson

[coastal]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

No way Watkins is there. He's a top 3 talent.

[ICRockets]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Why do idiots around here continue to act like you're not allowed to like more than one prospect at a time? I'd love either Evans or Watkins. I see Watkins as a Mike Wallace type, who would indeed fit well in an up-tempo offense like ours. But I prefer Andre Johnson 2.0, Mike Evans. Would I be angry at the Bills FO for taking one over the other if both are available? Abso-****ing-lutely not.

[stuckincincy]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

I mean it's not even close, Watkins is getting doubled and tripled and killing it and Mike Evans can barely get separation. If we are taking a WR in the first it's Watkins or nobody

That's a big if...

NFL Team Opponent Rushing Yards per Game

2013 #28 BUF
2012 #31 BUF
2011 #28 BUF
2010 #32 BUF
2009 #30 BUF.

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-rushing-yards-per-game

[swiper]

Re: Mike Evans? Heck No, Sammy Watkins? Heck yes

Midget?

Watkins is 6' 0" 1/2 and 205 lbs.

That's big enough for me!