FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stuckincincy
    Buffalo Bills Fan
    • Sep 2003
    • 15084

    FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

    1. Oakland Raiders: 148-108, .578
    2. Denver Broncos: 146-110, .570
    3. St. Louis Rams: 144-111-1, .564
    T-4. San Diego Chargers: 144-112, .563
    T-4. San Francisco 49ers: 144-112, .563
    6. Seattle Seahawks: 143-112-1, .561
    7. Kansas City Chiefs: 143-113, .559
    8.Arizona Cardinals: 140-116, .547
    9. New York Jets: 132-122-2, .520
    10. New England Patriots: 131-123-2, .516
    11. Atlanta Falcons: 130-124-2 .512
    12. Miami Dolphins: 129-125-2, .508
    13. Green Bay Packers: 128-126-2, .504
    14. Buffalo Bills: 127-127-2, .500
    15. Chicago Bears: 125-127-4, .496
    16. Detroit Lions: 124-128-4, .492
    17. Washington Redskins: 125-130-1, .490
    18. Dallas Cowboys: 125-131, .488
    19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 123-131-2, .484
    20. Philadelphia Eagles: 122-133-1, .479
    21. Minnesota Vikings: 121-133-2, .477
    22. Carolina Panthers: 120-134-2, .473
    T-23. Cincinnati Bengals: 120-136, .469
    T-23. Pittsburgh Steelers: 120-136, .469
    T-23. New Orleans Saints: 119-135-2 .469
    T-26. Cleveland Browns: 119-137, .465
    T-26. New York Giants: 119-137, .465
    28. Baltimore Ravens: 117-139, .461
    29. Jacksonville Jaguars: 116-140, .453
    30. Houston Texans: 113-143, .441
    31. Tennessee Titans: 112-144, .438
    32. Indianapolis Colts: 110-146, .430




    BUF's 2014 opponents:


    Home: Dolphins, Patriots, Jets, Chiefs, Chargers, Browns, Packers, Vikings
    Away: Dolphins, Patriots, Jets, Broncos, Raiders, Texans, Bears, Lions

    Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.
  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86315

    #2
    Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

    Tough schedule.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

    Comment

    • TacklingDummy
      Unreachable Douche
      • Jul 2002
      • 71725

      #3
      Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

      6-10

      Comment

      • JohnnyGold
        Registered User
        • Dec 2008
        • 361

        #4
        Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

        Originally posted by stuckincincy View Post
        Home: Dolphins, Patriots, Jets, Chiefs, Chargers, Browns, Packers, Vikings
        Away: Dolphins, Patriots, Jets, Broncos, Raiders, Texans, Bears, Lions

        http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-...ason-opponents
        aside from the broncos game, every game on that schedule looks winnable for buffalo.

        the patriots (in foxboro) and the broncos should be the only ones where the line is over 2.5 points for either club.

        should be an interesting season, in my opinion this is the year where we break the streak.

        10-6, #6 seed.

        Comment

        • MitchMurrayDowntown
          Skoobasaurus-Rex
          • Oct 2011
          • 22284

          #5
          Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

          If EJ is healthy & playing well, then we're 8-8.

          Comment

          • SpikedLemonade
            • Jun 2024

            #6
            Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

            8-8

            Comment

            • stuckincincy
              Buffalo Bills Fan
              • Sep 2003
              • 15084

              #7
              Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

              Originally posted by YardRat View Post
              Tough schedule.
              They have their work cut out for them. Looks like an entertaining line-up for the fans. 4 clubs with new head coaches...the games against CLE with Pettine, and @DET with Shwartz as BUF's DC.
              Last edited by stuckincincy; 02-17-2014, 10:36 AM.
              Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

              Comment

              • Jeff1220
                H to the 12:20
                • Jul 2002
                • 6137

                #8
                Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

                I really think we're in an age of football where the strength of schedule, based on the previous year, is obsolete. Too many teams go from strong to weak and weak to strong in one offseason nowadays.

                Comment

                • TacklingDummy
                  Unreachable Douche
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 71725

                  #9
                  Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

                  Originally posted by Jeff1220 View Post
                  I really think we're in an age of football where the strength of schedule, based on the previous year, is obsolete. Too many teams go from strong to weak and weak to strong in one offseason nowadays.
                  Except for the AFC East.
                  New England remains strong by beating up the other pussies in their Division.

                  Comment

                  • stuckincincy
                    Buffalo Bills Fan
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 15084

                    #10
                    Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

                    Originally posted by Jeff1220 View Post
                    I really think we're in an age of football where the strength of schedule, based on the previous year, is obsolete. Too many teams go from strong to weak and weak to strong in one offseason nowadays.

                    For sure...

                    ..After all of this strength of schedule talk, the obvious question here is: Does strength of schedule actually mean anything? Going into the 2013 season, the Carolina Panthers had the toughest strength of schedule. After the 2013 season was over though, the Panthers had only played the 17th most difficult schedule.

                    A lot of that had to do with the fact that Carolina played the Falcons twice. Going into 2013, the Panthers strength of schedule was calculated using the Falcons 2012 record of 13-3. After 2013, it was calculated using the Falcons 2013 record of 4-12..."...

                    It's just something to kick around during the off-season. Or carp about when one's team swirls around the toilet.
                    Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

                    Comment

                    • BillsFever21
                      Registered User
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 9067

                      #11
                      Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

                      The AFC West or NFC South won't be easy divisions to beat.

                      Comment

                      • Swiper
                        Legendary Zoner
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 33105

                        #12
                        Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

                        EJ Manuel sucks.

                        Schartz won't win playing 9 wide.

                        Ralph is cheap.

                        Comment

                        • MitchMurrayDowntown
                          Skoobasaurus-Rex
                          • Oct 2011
                          • 22284

                          #13
                          Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

                          Originally posted by BillsFever21 View Post
                          The AFC West or NFC South won't be easy divisions to beat.
                          The NFC west looks like it's the toughest division, Seattle is not in for a easy time of it.

                          Comment

                          • Yasgur's Farm
                            Moderator
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 7091

                            #14
                            Re: FWIW: 2014 Strength of Schedule

                            Originally posted by MitchMurrayDowntown View Post
                            If EJ is healthy & playing well, then we're 8-8.
                            anything lass than 9 wins from EJ falls short of what I would consider acceptable growth on his part

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X