If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
That still undersells it. We've got a few contracts that are overstated. The biggest being Kolb, he isn't coming back and once he takes a buyout his salary will be replaced with someone cheaper.
That still undersells it. We've got a few contracts that are overstated. The biggest being Kolb, he isn't coming back and once he takes a buyout his salary will be replaced with someone cheaper.
I remember reading that if we were to cut Kolb, Legursky, and Pears, we would save an additional 7 or 8 million in cap space.
After rookie allocations, we should easily have at least 25 million in cap space to work with.
I remember reading that if we were to cut Kolb, Legursky, and Pears, we would save an additional 7 or 8 million in cap space.
After rookie allocations, we should easily have at least 25 million in cap space to work with.
Kolb is 3.6 with 500K dead money and Pears is 3.45 with 550K in dead money. So between those two we get back almost 6 mill. Legursky is 1.1 mill with 100K in dead money.
So yeah. Right around 7 mill in space.
My issue is that we don't need the space. I'd make these moves if we needed the money. If we don't I want depth and Pears at least represents that. As might Legursky.
That still undersells it. We've got a few contracts that are overstated. The biggest being Kolb, he isn't coming back and once he takes a buyout his salary will be replaced with someone cheaper.
Didn't we roll over $18M+ from last year? Even with the Fitz dead money we choose for some inexplicable reason to move entirely into this year when we had more than enough money last year to take the whole hit, we should be closer to $30M.
Kolb is 3.6 with 500K dead money and Pears is 3.45 with 550K in dead money. So between those two we get back almost 6 mill. Legursky is 1.1 mill with 100K in dead money.
So yeah. Right around 7 mill in space.
My issue is that we don't need the space. I'd make these moves if we needed the money. If we don't I want depth and Pears at least represents that. As might Legursky.
Pears is pricey for his performance and injury history, but I guess if healthy he's depth. As the 3rd tackle, I'm OK keeping him but 3.4 for a backup seems a little spendy, maybe not I haven't looked.
Legursky won't be on an NFL roster by the end of training camp. He ain't depth, he just sucks.
Yeah originally they had an article up saying they were only $15m under the cap but that quickly changed. I wonder if that includes the savings of cutting Kolb.
Comment