Jim Kelly - Treatable

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mace
    Haha...yeah you think so ?
    • Mar 2013
    • 20314

    Jim Kelly - Treatable

    This is good news I think.



    “Jim Kelly's condition remains very treatable and potentially curable,” Dr. Costantino said. “Our immediate focus is on controlling his pain and beginning the process of eradicating the cancer.”
  • BertSquirtgum
    Registered User
    • May 2009
    • 13379

    #2
    Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

    Please Jesus. Don't take Jim too.

    Comment

    • Crisis
      Registered User
      • Aug 2004
      • 12738

      #3
      Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

      Worst offseason ever... hopefully things start to turn around
      Originally posted by LOSman WINS
      Vanek is Austrian not European
      Originally posted by Prov401
      Pacquiao isn't asian. He's from the philippines
      Originally posted by better days
      I will not be surprised if Tebow has more success than Peyton in the NFL.

      Comment

      • Dr. Lecter
        Zero for Zero!
        • Mar 2003
        • 67930

        #4
        Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

        I don't think the term "potentially curable" is encouraging. But maybe I am being too pessimistic
        Originally posted by mysticsoto
        Lecter is right in everything he said.

        Comment

        • RedEyE
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 24661

          #5
          Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

          I don't know. I was thinking last night that if they decided to bypass surgery and go straight to chemo, I was afraid it meant the cancer had spread too far to cut it out. Praying for my life long hero.

          Comment

          • RedEyE
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 24661

            #6
            Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

            This definitly reads like "better" news.

            Comment

            • chernobylwraiths
              Registered User
              • Jan 2003
              • 41838

              #7
              Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

              Originally posted by RedEyE View Post
              I don't know. I was thinking last night that if they decided to bypass surgery and go straight to chemo, I was afraid it meant the cancer had spread too far to cut it out. Praying for my life long hero.
              That's exactly why they said surgery isn't really a good option now.

              Comment

              • chernobylwraiths
                Registered User
                • Jan 2003
                • 41838

                #8
                Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                Seeing that picture of Jim in a hospital bed with his daughter hugging him doesn't fill me with a sense of optimism. Then again, I saw how quickly cancer took my mom.

                Comment

                • Novacane
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 42348

                  #9
                  Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                  Originally posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
                  I don't think the term "potentially curable" is encouraging. But maybe I am being too pessimistic

                  But the term "very treatable" is! You ARE being pessimistic.

                  Comment

                  • Meathead
                    Insufferable prick and perpetual crybaby
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 21349

                    #10
                    Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                    Originally posted by RedEyE View Post
                    I was afraid it meant the cancer had spread too far to cut it out.
                    that is what it means. you want to cut out as much as you can so youre fighting as small an infected area as possible. they only dont do surgery on aggressive cancer when they cant get to it, its too widespread, or it would do too much damage (ie in a vital organ or the brain)
                    “Because of the complexity and aggressive nature of this cancer and after more scans and tests, the plan has changed,” Jill Kelly wrote in a Facebook post Wednesday afternoon. The cancer is in areas that surgery cannot successfully eradicate. Therefore, the medical specialists here in NYC along with our Buffalo team believe that chemotherapy and radiation are the best option.”

                    Originally posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
                    I don't think the term "potentially curable" is encouraging. But maybe I am being too pessimistic
                    well you never know. weve all heard and/or seen stories of ppl who had aggressive cancer that suddenly just disappears. ive known a few ppl that had that kind of luck, but quite frankly they are the serious exceptions

                    so technically until you get to the very end stages its all 'potentially curable', tho in fact its quite a longshot

                    generally when cancer spreads from other areas into the brain its game over, all you can do then is try to extend life. and once its in your spine its in your brain bc your spinal chord is a no tolls expressway to your brain

                    sure hope we get that miracle, but if this were my loved one i would be preparing myself and others for what is likely inevitable
                    Last edited by Meathead; 03-27-2014, 06:52 AM.
                    One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                    Comment

                    • Dr. Lecter
                      Zero for Zero!
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 67930

                      #11
                      Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                      Originally posted by Novacane View Post
                      But the term "very treatable" is! You ARE being pessimistic.
                      Treatable leaves a lot of room. What exactly is treatable? Giving him another 3-6 months of life?

                      The words used seem to have been very carefully choosen
                      Originally posted by mysticsoto
                      Lecter is right in everything he said.

                      Comment

                      • Forward_Lateral
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 29895

                        #12
                        Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                        **** Cancer.
                        Last edited by The King; 03-27-2014, 09:17 AM.

                        Comment

                        • Meathead
                          Insufferable prick and perpetual crybaby
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 21349

                          #13
                          Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                          agree

                          the only cancer that isnt treatable is the very end stages where the treatment itself will surely kill you

                          when my aunts fifteen year battle with cancer spread to her brain she lost the ability to speak. they gave her one last round of aggressive chemo to shrink the tumors enough so that her brain functioned semi-normally for a few weeks. we used that time to have a final family party at her house for about a week so that ppl could get there and spend some final time with her, sort of like a living wake. we did what we normally do at our family gatherings - get drunk, eat a ton of great food, play games, and rag on each other. it was a great way to say goodbye. after that the cancer came roaring back and she was gone in a matter of days

                          for other non-brain cancer patients, they can also pump you full of drugs to return to you a semblance of normalcy, but its so hard on the body they only do that when its surely over and they want to give ppl a chance to say goodbye and get a response. at that point youre talking about literally a day or two left of life and it doesnt always work
                          One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                          Comment

                          • Meathead
                            Insufferable prick and perpetual crybaby
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 21349

                            #14
                            Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                            Originally posted by Forward_Lateral View Post
                            **** Cancer.
                            no ****
                            Last edited by The King; 03-27-2014, 10:34 AM.
                            One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                            Comment

                            • Novacane
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 42348

                              #15
                              Re: Jim Kelly - Treatable

                              Originally posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
                              Treatable leaves a lot of room. What exactly is treatable? Giving him another 3-6 months of life?

                              The words used seem to have been very carefully choosen

                              If he had said treatable I wouldn't have been as optimistic. I find hope in the DR adding Very to his statement. One little word makes a big difference IMO. Hoping and praying for the best.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X