Clowney had 13 sacks in 2012.
3 in 2013.
The, "He was playing to not get hurt," is a bad excuse that makes me question Clowney's character as a football player.
Mack had 10.5 sacks in 2013.
Total sacks?
Khalil Mack had 28.5 sacks in 4 years, Clowney had 24 sacks in 3 years. That's a wash.
But career tackles? It's not even close.
Mack 68, 65, 94, and 100 tackles in his college career for a total of 327.
Clowney 36, 54, 40 in his college career for a total of 130.
Not having an official team owner also presents a unique opportunity for Doug Whaley to make a huge splash and take a chance he might not be able to make if Ralph were still alive.
What would you do? Protect the quarterback first, or trade up to draft a dominant defensive player like Khalil Mack?
If Mack is still on the board at 5, and the Bills know they can get a very good right tackle in the second or third round, would you give Oakland a buzz?
3 in 2013.
The, "He was playing to not get hurt," is a bad excuse that makes me question Clowney's character as a football player.
Mack had 10.5 sacks in 2013.
Total sacks?
Khalil Mack had 28.5 sacks in 4 years, Clowney had 24 sacks in 3 years. That's a wash.
But career tackles? It's not even close.
Mack 68, 65, 94, and 100 tackles in his college career for a total of 327.
Clowney 36, 54, 40 in his college career for a total of 130.
Not having an official team owner also presents a unique opportunity for Doug Whaley to make a huge splash and take a chance he might not be able to make if Ralph were still alive.
What would you do? Protect the quarterback first, or trade up to draft a dominant defensive player like Khalil Mack?
If Mack is still on the board at 5, and the Bills know they can get a very good right tackle in the second or third round, would you give Oakland a buzz?
Comment