SF may want to move up...

[X-Era]

They pick at 30. Supposedly they like Mike Evans who may be there at 9, maybe not.

They have two second rounders. Picks 56 and 61.

they get our 9 pick for their 1st and both 2nd's? I'd have no issue with that move.

We'd end up with picks 30, 41, 56, and 61.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/04/28/talk-persists-that-the-49ers-could-move-up/

The old draft value chart says:

9=1350

30=620
56=340
61=292

total=1252

http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

If that all happened what would you spend those picks on?

[better days]

If the 49ers want Evans, they will have to move up to at least #7.

[DraftBoy]

Did you steal this from my Twitter account X? j/k

I agree SF makes perfect sense if Evans is sitting there at 9. They'll pay a kings ransom because they have a full roster.

[Bills Juggernaut]

Why not throw in SF's last pick of the third round to make it almost perfectly even?

Pick 100=100

1350 and 1352...........

That would give us 6 picks in the top 100 in the deepest draft in years.

[X-Era]

Did you steal this from my Twitter account X? j/k

I agree SF makes perfect sense if Evans is sitting there at 9. They'll pay a kings ransom because they have a full roster.Honestly didn't. Haven't been to Twitter in a week.

[X-Era]

If the 49ers want Evans, they will have to move up to at least #7.
Not necessarily. I don't think it's a given that Evans is taken at 7.

[Night Train]

http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/showthread.php/223601-San-Fran-Has-11-Draft-Picks-Whaley-Should-Be-Calling-Them-To-Trade-Down

[jimmifli]

Not enough. I'm all for trading down and grabbing extra picks, but that's not enough.

[Ed]

It makes a lot of sense that SF would try to move up. They have a championship contending team with good depth. They simply don't have the roster spots for all 11 of their draft picks. No point in having extra draft picks if you're just going to have to cut some of them.

I hope there are other players they'd be willing to move up for besides Evans because I don't think he'll be there either.

I would absolutely take two 2nds to move down. There are going to be great players available at the end of the 1st and throughout the 2nd. Adding four players in the first two rounds would be awesome.

[k-oneputt]

If this trade happens you are then looking at players like;

Shazier,Borland
Moncrief, Mattews Latimer
Koundjio, James, Su'aFilo
Jenkins, Niklas
Ford
Fuller
Hill, Seastrunk.

[Skooby]

It'd probably yield us at least 2 good starters out 4 players taken in the first 2 rounds, so it's pretty tempting. We also can get 1 great player that changes our defense's dynamic in Clowney going the other way.

[HAMMER]

If the 49ers want Evans, they will have to move up to at least #7.

Not necessarily true, lots of talk the Bucs like Manziel as well.

[Meathead]

http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/showthread.php/223601-San-Fran-Has-11-Draft-Picks-Whaley-Should-Be-Calling-Them-To-Trade-Down

http://imageshack.com/a/img84/599/tumbleweed.png

[DraftBoy]

If this trade happens you are then looking at players like;

Shazier,Borland
Moncrief, Mattews Latimer
Koundjio, James, Su'aFilo
Jenkins, Niklas
Ford
Fuller
Hill, Seastrunk.

In Round 1 or just in general?

[ghz in pittsburgh]

I'll need their 1st next year to go down almost a round

[justasportsfan]

switch picks with SF ,take both their 2nd rd picks this year and their first next year.

[MTBillsFan]

I'd hope Whaley would pull the trigger if SF called and offered that to move.

[Thief]

switch picks with SF ,take both their 2nd rd picks this year and their first next year.Well sure. But I don't think Andrew Luck will be available to draft around our 9th pic.

[TigerJ]

Did you steal this from my Twitter account X? j/k

I agree SF makes perfect sense if Evans is sitting there at 9. They'll pay a kings ransom because they have a full roster.The question is, would SF wait until Evans drops, or would they try to get ahead of Tampa Bay which is rumored to be targeting Evans? I personally would be surprised to see them wait.

[Kenny]

To be honest, if Evans or Matthews was still there @ 9, I'd rather take one of those players rather than get more picks. We need impact players on this team, and while there's never a guarantee, I'd like to at least believe a high pick gives you a better chance at getting you an impact player

[YardRat]

Juwan James, Donte Moncrief, Marcus Martin, Austin Sefarian-Jenkins

[BLeonard]

Why not throw in SF's last pick of the third round to make it almost perfectly even?

Pick 100=100

1350 and 1352...........

That would give us 6 picks in the top 100 in the deepest draft in years.

Because teams can't trade compensatory selections... The #77 and/or #94 overall could be dealt, though.

Personally, I'd give them two options:

1: Their first, both twos and both threes that they can trade (5 picks overall) or
2: Their first, both twos and their first in 2015 (4 picks overall)

-Bill

[BertSquirtgum]

Bills need to stay where they are and draft Mike Evans or Eric Ebron. EJ needs a big target. If Jake Matthews is available I would take him though. I just highly doubt he will still be available. Just say no to Taylor Lewan.

[HAMMER]

Taylor Lewan is going to be a monster, if they pass on him it will be a travesty.

[stuckincincy]

Taylor Lewan is going to be a monster, if they pass on him it will be a travesty.

He can bunk with Ritchie Incognito.