PDA

View Full Version : State hires California firm to study sites for new Bills stadium



BLeonard
05-06-2014, 07:06 PM
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/bills-nfl/state-hires-california-firm-to-study-sites-for-new-bills-stadium-20140506



The location scouting team will confine its site identification to the “Buffalo region” – avoiding any crossing over into the border to Ontario – as part of a plan that will develop highly detailed projections over everything from the number of seats to how to incorporate a new football facility into other economic development projects in a community.

Sources close to the effort said the company could end up looking at a dozen sites before reducing the list to a “workable’’ three or four new locations. The company also is charged with doing an economic analysis of keeping the Bills in their current stadium in Orchard Park.

Site visits by AECOM executives will start Monday and conclude June 17, with a draft report due to the state by June 17 and a final report by July 11.

The work is being fast-tracked because of the effort by the trust of the estate of the team’s longtime owner, Ralph C. Wilson Jr., to sell the team, possibly as soon as this year. It also comes after the state, county, team and National Football League last year approved a new stadium lease to keep the Bills in Buffalo for 10 years, though there is an escape clause in the contract’s seventh year.




The Cuomo administration is hoping to negotiate a new stadium lease deal with the next team’s owners with terms as long as 30 years.

“We want to present a long-term solution that will keep the Bills in Western New York for decades to come. Someone is going to buy the team, and we want them to have the best information available in order to give them confidence in the region and the widespread support the team has in it,” said Irwin Raij, a co-chairman of the Sports Practice legal team at Foley & Lardner, which represented the state during the 2012 and 2013 stadium lease negotiations and was recently retained again by the state for what the Cuomo administration hopes will be longer term contract talks with whoever ends up owning the team.

The audience for the report is not only Cuomo and Erie County – so officials can know what to expect about the economic and financial implications of any new stadium project – but also buyers of the team and the NFL, whose owners have to approve the sale of the team.



The report will include an array of architectural, infrastructure and financial information, but it will not include a dollar amount that the state might be willing to spend on a new stadium to keep the team in the Buffalo area. That would come down the road, assuming the new owners want a new stadium and want to stay in the region.

Sources say the next owners will certainly want to perform their own stadium analysis but that AECOM’s work will be an important tool the team’s next owners – or even prospective bidders – can use in judging the value of keeping the team here.

AECOM is a respected name in the sports world, having been key partners in projects that include stadiums home to the NFL’s Seattle Seahawks and baseball’s Arizona Diamondbacks. It was involved in the renovations at Lambeau Field for the Green Bay Packers and the Olympic Stadium for the 2008 games in Beijing, as well as a number of major college football stadiums.


The timetable is short, given the amount of work the state and the law firm wants to receive from AECOM. The company will look at whether it makes financial and economic sense to build a stadium with, for instance, 60,000 to 80,000 seats, and whether the right parcels exist in downtown Buffalo or other area locations for a new stadium. Infrastructure, such as existing or new roads that might be needed, will be a part of the work, as well as how many acres a stadium would need and, most obviously, construction cost estimates.

Sources said the sites will be as specific as possible and won’t be listed as just “downtown Buffalo.’’

Ancillary mixed-used real estate developments for a new stadium site – such as possibly incorporating a stadium into some kind of year-round venture – also will be a key part of the study. Revenue estimates for everything from ticket sales to parking and concessions also will be projected for each site, and the firm will have to estimate costs for purchasing seats and “soft” costs, such as marketing.

Even “toilet fixture ratios” are a part of the study for each proposed site, as are graphic designs showing how vehicles will get into and out of stadium parking lots.


The review calls for “lessons learned” by up to five other stadium projects to help determine how everything from the size of a stadium to revenue projections and public sector financial support “might apply to a new Buffalo Bills stadium.”

They will look at revenue potential from advertising and sponsorships for each stadium site and even whether certain features – such as a retractable roof and the kinds of general admission and premium seating – should be considered. The contract also calls for AECOM to assess the “future potential’’ of the existing stadium.

The final three or four sites selected by AECOM will be done, the document notes, in consultation with both Raij’s law firm and the Cuomo administration’s economic development agency.

The contract calls for AECOM to come up with one rendering for each site based on information from Google Maps and “massing of the proposed stadium and ancillary development.” The company is not expected to show actual architectural designs, but the “scale and mass’’ of a stadium development.

However, the firm will supply what the contract calls a “generic stadium model” for each site that will include a three-dimensional “generic stadium computer model … based on an agreed-upon total program size,” which the contract said, for example, could be 1.2 million square feet.

-Bill

YardRat
05-06-2014, 07:12 PM
Most leases in the league for teams with new stadiums run in the 20-30 year range.

IlluminatusUIUC
05-06-2014, 08:21 PM
That title is very misleading. The location of the firm is irrelevant, and it comes off sounding like they are looking for relocation sites in California.

BLeonard
05-06-2014, 08:39 PM
That title is very misleading. The location of the firm is irrelevant, and it comes off sounding like they are looking for relocation sites in California.

I just used the same title as the Buffalo News did...

-Bill

IlluminatusUIUC
05-06-2014, 08:45 PM
I just used the same title as the Buffalo News did...

-Bill

Then my complaint is with the Buffalo News editor, but it still stands.

feldspar
05-06-2014, 09:00 PM
Then my complaint is with the Buffalo News editor, but it still stands.

Yeah, they couldn't have picked a more horrible title if they tried.

TacklingDummy
05-06-2014, 09:17 PM
NY couldn't have hired a firm in NY to do the same thing and kept the NY taxpayers money in NY?

THRILLHO
05-06-2014, 09:21 PM
Yeah, they couldn't have picked a more horrible title if they tried.

The title was very carefully written I'm sure. What better way to get people to read it than by implying a move to California?

Skooby
05-06-2014, 10:29 PM
The NY firm was out of touch I'm sure, being local and all.

gebobs
05-06-2014, 10:41 PM
Yeah, they couldn't have picked a more horrible title if they tried.
Freemason Minions conspire with Lesbian Hippies to relocate Bills in a county somewhere south of the Hudson Bay and east of Honolulu.

Much worse.

trapezeus
05-07-2014, 07:38 AM
the california firm did the last least. they seem to be highly recommended according to previous articles. i think you'd rather have the best representing you than a crony in the state.

DraftBoy
05-07-2014, 08:04 AM
NY couldn't have hired a firm in NY to do the same thing and kept the NY taxpayers money in NY?

Ask and ye shall receive why the BN Editor choose the title.

TigerJ
05-07-2014, 04:26 PM
I'd have done the study for them for half the cost.

Don't Panic
05-07-2014, 08:01 PM
Love the timeline... just enough time to get some steam behind a downtown stadium on the waterfront before the typical Dbags have a chance to F it up with their meddling.