where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ublinkwescore
    Sab and TD are insignificant
    • Sep 2002
    • 24178

    where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

    I say 25 and a divisional playoff game appearance
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire
  • DraftBoy
    Administrator
    • Jul 2002
    • 107452

    #2
    Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

    Anywhere from 1 to 32.

    This trade isn't won or lost next year.
    COMING SOON...
    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

    Comment

    • Novacane
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 42353

      #3
      Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

      They have to make the playoffs

      Comment

      • Kenny
        Registered User
        • Aug 2004
        • 2728

        #4
        Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

        Doesnt matter where the pick is. As long as Watkins shows flashes of being elite during the season, we're fine.

        Comment

        • DynaPaul
          Registered User
          • Sep 2003
          • 7540

          #5
          Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

          20 or later is fine by me. If it's in the top 10 then we definitely have a fail.

          Comment

          • Novacane
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 42353

            #6
            Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

            Originally posted by DraftBoy View Post
            Anywhere from 1 to 32.

            This trade isn't won or lost next year.

            Oh please! If our pick ends up being #1 this was a bad trade even if Watkins ends up a good player.

            Comment

            • ublinkwescore
              Sab and TD are insignificant
              • Sep 2002
              • 24178

              #7
              Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

              Originally posted by DraftBoy View Post
              Anywhere from 1 to 32.

              This trade isn't won or lost next year.
              I disagree. if we miss the playoffs by 2 seeds or more, we have lost. PERIOD. If we draft at 18 or higher, we lost. if our first ends up being cleveland's # 19 to 24, we broke even. from number 25 on and a divisional playoff game on, we have won. we still have other picks to hopefully find our new Cordy Glenn. Arm and defend EJ, that is the only thing this front office needs to concern it's self with.
              www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

              Comment

              • The Jokeman
                Registered User
                • Dec 2003
                • 9995

                #8
                Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                Originally posted by ublinkwescore View Post
                I say 25 and a divisional playoff game appearance
                I've been saying 16 or lower.

                Comment

                • ublinkwescore
                  Sab and TD are insignificant
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 24178

                  #9
                  Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                  16 is just shy of breaking even

                  - - - Updated - - -

                  16 is just shy of breaking even
                  www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

                  Comment

                  • DraftBoy
                    Administrator
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 107452

                    #10
                    Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                    Originally posted by Novacane View Post
                    Oh please! If our pick ends up being #1 this was a bad trade even if Watkins ends up a good player.
                    That's bull****. If it ends 1 next year but we win a SB in three years and Watkins is a league MVP its a great trade.

                    It is absolutely stupid to judge the trade based on where the pick is next year.
                    COMING SOON...
                    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • TacklingDummy
                      Unreachable Douche
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 71725

                      #11
                      Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                      1

                      That way we get the 33rd pick.

                      Comment

                      • EDS
                        Registered User
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 5216

                        #12
                        Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                        I think Whaley will look foolish if the Bills don't make the playoffs this season and will be fired in that event.

                        Comment

                        • Mr. Pink
                          Peterman Sucks!
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 35303

                          #13
                          Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                          The only way it's a loss is if they're bad enough to be in a place to select one of the top tier elite prospects, which is usually top 4-5. After that, you're losing out on a second or even third tier type of prospect. It's better to have top tier elite prospect than have 2 second tier prospects. The reason this team has been garbage for as long as it's been is they lack elite talent, they did what they had to do last night to get elite talent.

                          Even still, as DB pointed out, if the team 2 years from now is a playoff caliber team and Watkins lights the league on fire, it doesn't matter what they gave up.

                          Comment

                          • ublinkwescore
                            Sab and TD are insignificant
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 24178

                            #14
                            Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                            good point, but I would feel better about this team with it getting its playoff experience sooner rather than later. we should be able to crawl through that window of opportunity stage this year. we have the talent now, and the ability to improve this roster even more.

                            - - - Updated - - -

                            good point, but I would feel better about this team with it getting its playoff experience sooner rather than later. we should be able to crawl through that window of opportunity stage this year. we have the talent now, and the ability to improve this roster even more.
                            www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

                            Comment

                            • Homegrown
                              Havin' a ball ... rollin' to the bottom
                              • Jul 2008
                              • 2774

                              #15
                              Re: where does Buffalo's 1st next year have to be at for us to win this trade?

                              Originally posted by TacklingDummy View Post
                              1

                              That way we get the 33rd pick.
                              Now that's a glass 1/2 full outlook!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X