PDA

View Full Version : SIAP: Bills expected to try and trade Stevie Johnson



psubills62
05-09-2014, 11:25 AM
http://www.wgr550.com/10-Bills-related-thoughts-after-Day-1/9034669?pid=400564


...if the Bills went with a receiver in the first round, veteran wideout Stevie Johnson likely goes on the trading block according to a league source. The logic is very simple behind it: the Bills now have five receivers on their roster that demand playing time on offense. Four of those players were brought in by the current general manager and coaching staff, and only one has an astronomical cap hit for 2014 comparatively speaking. Johnson is signed for the next three seasons with cap hits of $8.5 million (2014), $8.85 million (2015) and $8.95 million (2016). Combine that with the clashing personalities of Johnson and head coach Doug Marrone, and it all adds up to the Bills doing what they can to try and move Johnson. The other casualty of the Watkins pick? Former third-round pick T.J. Graham, who was on thin ice even before they selected the Clemson wideout. It’s put up or shut up time in training camp for Graham on both offense and special teams.

Buffalogic
05-09-2014, 11:29 AM
Great fit in San Fran.

jimmifli
05-09-2014, 11:31 AM
That's a new twist on our usual strategy of creating new unnecessary holes and then filling them. Now we are filling the hole before we created it. Novel.

The Jokeman
05-09-2014, 11:31 AM
Great fit in San Fran.

Do the 49ers have the cap room? And would he want to play there with Boldin and Crabtree already there? Toss in Vernon Davis.

Mahdi
05-09-2014, 11:45 AM
Stevie would be awesome slotted between Watkins and Woods. Why not keep the unit strong? Why do we always have to subtract talent?

The Jokeman
05-09-2014, 11:48 AM
Stevie would be awesome slotted between Watkins and Woods. Why not keep the unit strong? Why do we always have to subtract talent?

Cuz the Bills are the proverbial dog chasing it's own tail team.

Turf
05-09-2014, 11:53 AM
Maybe we can trade him for a tackle.

DraftBoy
05-09-2014, 11:53 AM
Stevie would be awesome slotted between Watkins and Woods. Why not keep the unit strong? Why do we always have to subtract talent?

What does he offer that Woods doesn't? Outside of bad drops, and a tendency to act like an idiot.

DynaPaul
05-09-2014, 11:56 AM
I'd keep him for this year and if he doesn't step it up and start taking direction I'd try to move him then. At least give him another shot.

DBrown77
05-09-2014, 12:05 PM
He would definitely need to restructure that contract for any trade. We have the cap room and our WR's are constantly injured. We need to keep him at least this year imo.

DraftBoy
05-09-2014, 12:09 PM
NFL Network Around The League is predicting the trade will be to Carolina for a 4th;
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000348578/article/trade-predictions-for-2014-nfl-draft-weekend?campaign=Twitter_atl

psubills62
05-09-2014, 12:10 PM
What does he offer that Woods doesn't? Outside of bad drops, and a tendency to act like an idiot.
I'd been thinking Johnson and Woods (and IMO, Williams) are a bit redundant. Johnson is good, possibly very good, but he's no longer necessary and they should get value for him while they can. Just not sure how much other teams might want him with that contract/cap hit.

Forward_Lateral
05-09-2014, 12:10 PM
What does he offer that Woods doesn't? Outside of bad drops, and a tendency to act like an idiot.

The Bills know what they have in Stevie. A guy with great potential, that drops balls at crucial points of games. That being said, I would not cry if they kept Stevie, he has a God given ability to get open and does make huge plays for the team as well


I guess I'm indifferent. If they keep him, good, if they trade him, ok.

Mahdi
05-09-2014, 12:11 PM
What does he offer that Woods doesn't? Outside of bad drops, and a tendency to act like an idiot.

He's a better player than Woods. And in my scenario all 3 are on the field so comparing who is better is moot. Im saying Stevie in the slot with Woods and Watkins outside.

Stevie is certainly better than Goodwin or Graham or Williams for that matter. I still think Stevie is a very unique receiver and can help this team.

DraftBoy
05-09-2014, 12:12 PM
He's a better player than Woods. And in my scenario all 3 are on the field so comparing who is better is moot. Im saying Stevie in the slot with Woods and Watkins outside.

Stevie is certainly better than Goodwin or Graham or Williams for that matter. I still think Stevie is a very unique receiver and can help this team.

Answer the question, what skill set does he offer that Woods doesn't?

I don't think he's necessarily better than Mike Williams, he's a more consistent player but Williams is a hell of a WR when focused.

Mahdi
05-09-2014, 12:14 PM
Answer the question, what skill set does he offer that Woods doesn't?

I don't think he's necessarily better than Mike Williams, he's a more consistent player but Williams is a hell of a WR when focused.

His ability to get open 1 on 1. Stevie has an ability to get open others simply don't have. Woods is more of a route runner specialist.

DraftBoy
05-09-2014, 12:16 PM
His ability to get open 1 on 1. Stevie has an ability to get open others simply don't have. Woods is more of a route runner specialist.

Ummm...being a route running specialist gets you open...

The Jokeman
05-09-2014, 12:17 PM
What does he offer that Woods doesn't? Outside of bad drops, and a tendency to act like an idiot.

Three 1,000 yard seasons in the NFL.

Forward_Lateral
05-09-2014, 12:24 PM
Stevie is better than Woods right now. In a season or two, if Woods stays healthy, that won't be the case.

mysticsoto
05-09-2014, 12:30 PM
Answer the question, what skill set does he offer that Woods doesn't?

I don't think he's necessarily better than Mike Williams, he's a more consistent player but Williams is a hell of a WR when focused.

Stevie has had games where he showed up shutdown cornerbacks like Revis. I'd hate to see him go and still think he can operate out of the slot position very well. As a matter of fact, his numbers would likely go up giving that he wouldn't be going up against #1 DBs anymore.

Yes, his cap numbers are high for a #2 WR, but getting a 4th for him is useless. With a 4th, you're likely getting a low caliber player...in Stevie, we know what caliber of player we're getting - a decent WR.

Mahdi
05-09-2014, 12:31 PM
Ummm...being a route running specialist gets you open...

Not when Revis caliber guys are covering you... Johnson doesnt get shut down by top CBs he's proven that. I would never get rid of a guy that performs against the best.

HAMMER
05-09-2014, 12:33 PM
Time for Stevie to go.

Saratoga Slim
05-09-2014, 01:01 PM
What does he offer that Woods doesn't? Outside of bad drops, and a tendency to act like an idiot.

Don't forget perpetual groin issues.

- - - Updated - - -

I'd like to see him have a huge year in the slot for us, then trade him next winter for a 2nd or 3rd that we can package to get back into the first if we need to do so.

IlluminatusUIUC
05-09-2014, 01:32 PM
Not when Revis caliber guys are covering you... Johnson doesnt get shut down by top CBs he's proven that. I would never get rid of a guy that performs against the best.

And guess who just came back into the division.

GingerP
05-09-2014, 01:35 PM
Stevie was traded to SF for conditional 4th, can become a 3rd. Not sure the trigger to make it a 3rd.

Meathead
05-09-2014, 01:54 PM
Stevie is better than Woods right now. In a season or two, if Woods stays healthy, that won't be the case.

not even. woods passed stevie im last season and would have made that obvious early this year. stevie is still good, woods is just going to be better. and in fact he already is imo

paladin warrior
05-09-2014, 02:13 PM
There is a lots WR right now. maybe bills take a other WR in last round.

HAMMER
05-09-2014, 02:21 PM
Sayonara Stevie, never liked you're showboating ways or the fact that you blamed God for dropping passes.

Buffalogic
05-09-2014, 02:23 PM
Great fit in San Fran.Nailed it.

The Jokeman
05-09-2014, 02:25 PM
There is a lots WR right now. maybe bills take a other WR in last round.
We've already "used" a 1st and a 6th on WR when factor in the Mike Williams trade. I can't see drafting another one but then again I never expected us to take Goodwin in the 3rd last year.

Buffalogic
05-09-2014, 02:31 PM
Williams is Stevie's replacement not Watkins and Williams is arguably better or on par with Johnson. We gave up a 6th, received a 4th and we upgraded players (Watkins, Williams > Just Stevie)

Why do people get so mad? Think about it first.

DraftBoy
05-09-2014, 02:35 PM
Three 1,000 yard seasons in the NFL.

Not a skill set.

- - - Updated - - -


Not when Revis caliber guys are covering you... Johnson doesnt get shut down by top CBs he's proven that. I would never get rid of a guy that performs against the best.

So your basing your entire premise off how he preforms against one player? That's a flimsy plank.

GingerP
05-09-2014, 02:37 PM
So your basing your entire premise off how he preforms against one player? That's a flimsy plank.

The top 2 CB in the NFL have been Darrelle Revis and Richard Sherman. Johnson did as well or better than anyone against both those guys.

paladin warrior
05-09-2014, 02:45 PM
Need T.E badly

The Jokeman
05-09-2014, 02:47 PM
Not a skill set.

- - - Updated - - -



So your basing your entire premise off how he preforms against one player? That's a flimsy plank.

Until Watkins displays that he can live up to his skill set in the NFL I maintain Stevie's a better NFL WR than him.

paladin warrior
05-09-2014, 02:47 PM
We've already "used" a 1st and a 6th on WR when factor in the Mike Williams trade. I can't see drafting another one but then again I never expected us to take Goodwin in the 3rd last year.
yeah I don't know why take Goodwin in the 3rd round