7 Year Deal for Moorman

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • G-Money
    Registered User
    • Sep 2002
    • 3

    7 Year Deal for Moorman

    ESPN.com is reporting we've extended BM's contract with an option after the third year. Good News, let's work on Winfield next.

    ESPN.com has learned that Brian Moorman and the Bills have agreed to a new seven-year contract, a deal that runs through the 2009 season, and will be worth at least $6 million to the two-year veteran.
  • ryven
    Registered User
    • Jan 2003
    • 2230

    #2
    Thats one down now we need to sign winfield. This is great though

    Comment

    • LtBillsFan66
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 35553

      #3

      Comment

      • TypicalBill
        Registered User
        • Sep 2002
        • 9061

        #4
        The former Pittsburg (Kans.) State standout can also handle the kickoff duties.
        interesting..
        For the latest Bills news, visit the front page www.billszone.com

        Comment

        • Ebenezer
          Give me a minute...
          • Jul 2002
          • 73867

          #5
          7 years????...for a punter???




          For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

          Comment

          • clumping platelets

            #6
            Seems like a solid deal

            Comment

            • Ebenezer
              Give me a minute...
              • Jul 2002
              • 73867

              #7
              At the numbers provided, if this guy can net over 38 yards a punt we got a deal!!




              For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

              Comment

              • Aero II
                RWS Grounds Keeper. Why won't my grass grow?
                • Jul 2002
                • 1026

                #8
                Why is that article dated July 3?

                Comment

                • TypicalBill
                  Registered User
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 9061

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Aero II
                  Why is that article dated July 3?

                  Its a typing mistake, if you look here you'll see it at the bottom with todays date.
                  For the latest Bills news, visit the front page www.billszone.com

                  Comment

                  • Ebenezer
                    Give me a minute...
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 73867

                    #10
                    Except for Bledsoe, my spreadsheet did not even go out 7 years. lol.




                    For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

                    Comment

                    • JefftheBillsfan
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 1531

                      #11
                      i think i heard there was an option on year 3 just in case. congrads moorman. i remember his first year here, i thought he was going to be a major weak link. he had a solid season that year, despite slowing down towards the end. He seems to get better evey year. Can't wait to see him after another full offseason.
                      Its all about the quest.

                      Comment

                      • Jan Reimers
                        Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                        • May 2003
                        • 17353

                        #12
                        It will be interesting to see if we try him on kickoffs in TC.
                        Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                        Comment

                        • clumping platelets

                          #13
                          His cap number is a palatible $742,857 and doesn't change by much each year, even after the option payment before the 2006 season. His dead cap would be minimal as well. Very fair contract on both ends :)

                          Comment

                          • Dozerdog
                            In a jar, on a shelf, next to the unopened Miracle Whip.

                            Administrator Emeritus
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 42586

                            #14
                            I have a hypothetical question-


                            Let' say a player like Moorman signs a deal for 7 years and his salary never exceeds 800,000 any of the years.

                            Then, when the NFLPA has their next labor agreement with owners, the Vet minimum gets raised to 1,000,000 per year. Does that void the remaining years on the deal since it does not pay the minimum?

                            Are old contracts still honored at the salary negotiated?

                            Comment

                            • clumping platelets

                              #15
                              :dozer:

                              Prior to last season(2002), the NFLPA and NFL signed a CBA extension that included a provision that set minimum salaries for a number of yrs, however, if a player has a salary that ends up below the minimum for that players NFL experience, it is automatically raised to the minimum :)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X