BillsImpossible
08-10-2014, 02:14 PM
One would think the combination of Jim Kelly and Terry Pegula would be a slam dunk win for the Buffalo Bills and WNY, but that is not so.
This report from Channel 2 News confirms that Jim Kelly has allied himself with Amherst native, Jeff Gundlach.
Jeff who?
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/videos/sports/football/nfl/bills/2014/08/09/13821701/
Kelly and Gundlach have joined together as, "limited partners," and are looking to join forces with another bidder.
Who would that other bidder be?
I don't think it's Terry Pegula. If it was, why not say so by now and win the PR game? Would that violate the, "non-disclosure agreement?"
If Jim Kelly said, "I like the idea of Terry Pegula owning the Buffalo Bills," how would that violate the nda?
If Jim Kelly said, "I would have no problem with Terry Pegula being the next owner of the team," how would that violate the nda?
Why hasn't Jim Kelly said a single word about Terry Pegula?
Woodman just posted an interesting article that relates...
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/columnist/roth/2014/08/09/two-bills-drive/13847665/
Written by some smart bankers and lawyers, the non-disclosure agreement, Tim Graham of The Buffalo News reported, included loads of restrictions, including this: no speaking to other potential bidders. That prevented the opportunity for more partnerships to form. Apparently, the Wilson family trust prefers a more clean deal, meaning dealing with individual rich guys with cash on hand.
No speaking to other potential bidders?
Does this disqualify Jim Kelly and Jeff Gundlach?
This report from Channel 2 News confirms that Jim Kelly has allied himself with Amherst native, Jeff Gundlach.
Jeff who?
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/videos/sports/football/nfl/bills/2014/08/09/13821701/
Kelly and Gundlach have joined together as, "limited partners," and are looking to join forces with another bidder.
Who would that other bidder be?
I don't think it's Terry Pegula. If it was, why not say so by now and win the PR game? Would that violate the, "non-disclosure agreement?"
If Jim Kelly said, "I like the idea of Terry Pegula owning the Buffalo Bills," how would that violate the nda?
If Jim Kelly said, "I would have no problem with Terry Pegula being the next owner of the team," how would that violate the nda?
Why hasn't Jim Kelly said a single word about Terry Pegula?
Woodman just posted an interesting article that relates...
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/columnist/roth/2014/08/09/two-bills-drive/13847665/
Written by some smart bankers and lawyers, the non-disclosure agreement, Tim Graham of The Buffalo News reported, included loads of restrictions, including this: no speaking to other potential bidders. That prevented the opportunity for more partnerships to form. Apparently, the Wilson family trust prefers a more clean deal, meaning dealing with individual rich guys with cash on hand.
No speaking to other potential bidders?
Does this disqualify Jim Kelly and Jeff Gundlach?