inactives

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • black N yellow
    Registered User
    • Dec 2012
    • 311

    inactives


  • SpikedLemonade
    • Jun 2024

    #2
    Re: inactives

    That's good news.

    Comment

    • Yasgur's Farm
      Moderator
      • Feb 2005
      • 7091

      #3
      Re: inactives

      Looks like Kujo may get the start over Pears.

      Comment

      • YardRat
        Well, lookie here...
        • Dec 2004
        • 86271

        #4
        Re: inactives

        WTF w/Williams. Also, I think this is the first game Cockrell is dressing for.
        YardRat Wall of Fame
        #56 DARRYL TALLEY
        #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

        Comment

        • IlluminatusUIUC
          Registered User
          • Sep 2012
          • 8966

          #5
          Re: inactives

          Originally posted by YardRat View Post
          WTF w/Williams.
          He's done in Buffalo. If Marrone doesn't trust him to dress with his #1 as a game time decision, then Marrone will never trust him at all.


          Billszone 2013 Prediction Contest winner!

          Comment

          • feldspar
            Registered User
            • Mar 2007
            • 13620

            #6
            Re: inactives

            Originally posted by YardRat View Post
            WTF w/Williams.
            Indeed.

            Inexplicable to me.

            Comment

            • BillsImpossible
              Registered User
              • Mar 2013
              • 16206

              #7
              Re: inactives

              Originally posted by IlluminatusUIUC View Post
              He's done in Buffalo. If Marrone doesn't trust him to dress with his #1 as a game time decision, then Marrone will never trust him at all.
              It's not just Marrone who doesn't trust Williams.

              Nate Hackett said in a recent interview that a big reason why Mike Williams isn't playing is because he continuously runs the wrong routes in practices.

              I think that means Williams hasn't bothered to learn the playbook much.

              He has a ton of physical talent, but lacks the mental discipline to apply his talents on the field.

              Comment

              • ghz in pittsburgh
                Registered User
                • Aug 2004
                • 5861

                #8
                Re: inactives

                One of the reporter said during the open practice this week, Hackett had to go over twice with Williams because he ran wrong routes based on looks of defense etc. You don't want to see INTs because of that

                Comment

                • Novacane
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 42368

                  #9
                  Re: inactives

                  Once you're in Marones dog house you are done

                  Comment

                  • IlluminatusUIUC
                    Registered User
                    • Sep 2012
                    • 8966

                    #10
                    Re: inactives

                    Originally posted by BillsImpossible View Post
                    It's not just Marrone who doesn't trust Williams.

                    Nate Hackett said in a recent interview that a big reason why Mike Williams isn't playing is because he continuously runs the wrong routes in practices.

                    I think that means Williams hasn't bothered to learn the playbook much.

                    He has a ton of physical talent, but lacks the mental discipline to apply his talents on the field.
                    I haven't seen that interview, but it would explain things. He'd better turn it around quick or he's getting that bigtime contract dumped.


                    Billszone 2013 Prediction Contest winner!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X