It was not so long ago, that many of you DEFENDED the Marone hiring while mocking the hiring of Chip Kelly and even Andy Reid.
To a few it was obvious: Chip Kelly was an offensive mastermind and Reid has been one of the winningest coaches of the past decade compared to Doug Marrone's Mediocre Madness in Syracuse.
> After his first season, Marrone and staff were given a pass -and to many diehards the verdict was still out even though both Kelly & Reid made the playoffs.
> During the second season, Marrone seemed to have helped the Bills improve as they started out with a solid 5-3 record only to quickly fall to 5-5. Most homers have turned against this team, this FO, and this coaching staff.
In reflection, can you NOW see the difference between a Chip Kelly/Andy Reid hire and a Doug Marrone hire?
If this Bills make a similarly poor choice will Disapprove right away or wait 2-3 years until it is painfully obvious?
To a few it was obvious: Chip Kelly was an offensive mastermind and Reid has been one of the winningest coaches of the past decade compared to Doug Marrone's Mediocre Madness in Syracuse.
> After his first season, Marrone and staff were given a pass -and to many diehards the verdict was still out even though both Kelly & Reid made the playoffs.
> During the second season, Marrone seemed to have helped the Bills improve as they started out with a solid 5-3 record only to quickly fall to 5-5. Most homers have turned against this team, this FO, and this coaching staff.
In reflection, can you NOW see the difference between a Chip Kelly/Andy Reid hire and a Doug Marrone hire?
If this Bills make a similarly poor choice will Disapprove right away or wait 2-3 years until it is painfully obvious?
Comment