Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86147

    Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

    **** you, you sackless pieces of ****, not really looking forward to another season with you ball-less wonders.

    Sincerely,

    Sammy
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
  • Swiper
    Registered User
    • Sep 2010
    • 33105

    #2
    Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

    Can you imagine Watkins on a team with a good QB?
    Last edited by swiper; 12-28-2014, 02:17 PM.

    Comment

    • cookie G
      Registered User
      • Mar 2003
      • 7561

      #3
      Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

      Originally posted by Swiper View Post
      Can you imagine Watson on a team with a good QB?
      This is the 2nd time in a few days taht I have to ask...

      who the hell is Watson???

      Comment

      • Swiper
        Registered User
        • Sep 2010
        • 33105

        #4
        Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

        Originally posted by cookie G View Post
        This is the 2nd time in a few days taht I have to ask...

        who the hell is Watson???
        ROFL. Made a mistake. I sense you are a little surly this afternoon.

        Comment

        • cookie G
          Registered User
          • Mar 2003
          • 7561

          #5
          Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

          Originally posted by Swiper View Post
          ROFL. Made a mistake. I sense you are a little surly this afternoon.
          Someone else did it the other day...in referring to Ron Brooks.

          I can understand mixing up the Williams'...

          but I have to keep going to bb.com and looking at the roster...

          Watson..
          Watson..

          no Watson.

          Eh...this victory does nothign for me...

          Earlier in the day, I would have been thrilled, breaking the streak and all.

          But after watching Belichick pull people from the stands to play defense, and they STILL couldn't score in the 2nd half...

          its pretty much a fake orgasm.

          Comment

          • Mr. Cynical
            Maybe?
            • Oct 2003
            • 9766

            #6
            Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

            Originally posted by cookie G View Post
            Someone else did it the other day...in referring to Ron Brooks.

            I can understand mixing up the Williams'...

            but I have to keep going to bb.com and looking at the roster...

            Watson..
            Watson..

            no Watson.

            Eh...this victory does nothign for me...

            Earlier in the day, I would have been thrilled, breaking the streak and all.

            But after watching Belichick pull people from the stands to play defense, and they STILL couldn't score in the 2nd half...

            its pretty much a fake orgasm.

            This.

            Blow the FO apart Terry. Bring the truck full of C4.

            Comment

            • coastal
              Legendary Zoner
              • Mar 2005
              • 15513

              #7
              Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

              fake or not... blowing things up at this point would be monumentally stupid.

              I've been clamoring for an oline since Nick Mangold and Andrew Whitworth were passed up for the likes of Donte Whitner and John McCargo.

              Please restructure Mario... no Mike Williams... cut CJ Spiller... there's at least one of two free agent guards right there.

              Go and get Iupati and Boling.

              Shore up the interior of this oline once and for all and lets give this **** a go next year as a power running team with a lights out defesne.

              Comment

              • The Jokeman
                Registered User
                • Dec 2003
                • 9995

                #8
                Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                Originally posted by Swiper View Post
                Can you imagine Watkins on a team with a good QB?
                Beckham had 21 targets in today's game by contrast Watkins had 19 in the last three games combined. I know it's easy to rave on Beckham's numbers but this might account for something.

                Comment

                • YardRat
                  Well, lookie here...
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 86147

                  #9
                  Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                  I like Boling also, along with Iupati. There are enough G's up for grabs this season, there is no reason we don't get a quality starter for next year. Unless, of course, Terry is cheap.
                  YardRat Wall of Fame
                  #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                  #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                  Comment

                  • Don't Panic
                    All-Pro Zoner
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 4227

                    #10
                    Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                    Mario's not restructuring this year... why would he? As for Watkins, definitely a waste of his full capabilities. That one's gonna be hard to fix, too.

                    Comment

                    • The Jokeman
                      Registered User
                      • Dec 2003
                      • 9995

                      #11
                      Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                      Originally posted by coastal View Post
                      fake or not... blowing things up at this point would be monumentally stupid.

                      I've been clamoring for an oline since Nick Mangold and Andrew Whitworth were passed up for the likes of Donte Whitner and John McCargo.

                      Please restructure Mario... no Mike Williams... cut CJ Spiller... there's at least one of two free agent guards right there.

                      Go and get Iupati and Boling.

                      Shore up the interior of this oline once and for all and lets give this **** a go next year as a power running team with a lights out defesne.
                      Boling is doable but if we're going to give Hughes his money I can't see getting Iupati with him especially with Chris Williams' contract on the books.

                      Comment

                      • The Jokeman
                        Registered User
                        • Dec 2003
                        • 9995

                        #12
                        Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                        Originally posted by YardRat View Post
                        I like Boling also, along with Iupati. There are enough G's up for grabs this season, there is no reason we don't get a quality starter for next year. Unless, of course, Terry is cheap.
                        I go back and forth between signing a starting veteran OG. As yes we need one but pending cap space I might pursue a TE more as think it's as big a need as OG.

                        Comment

                        • YardRat
                          Well, lookie here...
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 86147

                          #13
                          Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                          Originally posted by cookie G View Post
                          Someone else did it the other day...in referring to Ron Brooks.

                          I can understand mixing up the Williams'...

                          but I have to keep going to bb.com and looking at the roster...

                          Watson..
                          Watson..

                          no Watson.

                          Eh...this victory does nothign for me...

                          Earlier in the day, I would have been thrilled, breaking the streak and all.

                          But after watching Belichick pull people from the stands to play defense, and they STILL couldn't score in the 2nd half...

                          its pretty much a fake orgasm.
                          Well, they did win at least, so that elevates this team above Bledsoe vs Pittsburgh.
                          YardRat Wall of Fame
                          #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                          #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                          Comment

                          • kingJofNYC
                            Registered User
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 5960

                            #14
                            Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                            I'm with you Coastal, focal point should be OL.

                            We need a RB too, I want Abdullah.

                            Comment

                            • Novacane
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 42348

                              #15
                              Re: Dear Doug, Nate and Kyle-

                              Originally posted by The Jokeman View Post
                              Beckham had 21 targets in today's game by contrast Watkins had 19 in the last three games combined. I know it's easy to rave on Beckham's numbers but this might account for something.

                              Yep, He can't catch balls that aren't thrown to him.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X