If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
According to Mike Rodak of ESPN, the Bills are planning to begin negotiations on a contract extension for Bradham this week:
@mikerodak: Bills expected to talk contract extension for Nigel Bradham this week, per sources. Negotiator Jim Overdorf and agent Drew Rosenhaus in town
Re: Bills to talk extension with Bradham this week
but but but.... we will never be able to resign bradham, gilmore, glenn and dareus. we are all cap experts. this is what i've learned over the last 2 weeks or so.
but but but.... we will never be able to resign bradham, gilmore, glenn and dareus. we are all cap experts. this is what i've learned over the last 2 weeks or so.
He hasn't signed yet, and neither have any of the other three.
Re: Bills to talk extension with Bradham this week
I'd rather start with Dareus, but Bradham has to get done.
My only worry is that he wasn't good in a 34 last time, extending him now seems a little odd but if he continues to get better it probably saves some money.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
I'd rather start with Dareus, but Bradham has to get done.
My only worry is that he wasn't good in a 34 last time, extending him now seems a little odd but if he continues to get better it probably saves some money.
People keep saying that.
He was better than Kiko over the last 5 or 6 games. He made plays whenever the coaches put him on the field, and eventually earned a "starter" role.
I'd rather start with Dareus, but Bradham has to get done.
My only worry is that he wasn't good in a 34 last time, extending him now seems a little odd but if he continues to get better it probably saves some money.
Totally different type of 3-4 though, I think he'll do fine in an attacking scheme, which is what we'll be running going forward under Rex.
Totally different type of 3-4 though, I think he'll do fine in an attacking scheme, which is what we'll be running going forward under Rex.
The differences are minor, Pettine's schemes are/were considered aggressive. attacking and pressure based. The biggest difference is Rex's tendency to replace a LBer with another dback.
Of course you need to talk first. But end zone dancing about signing our four big fas when we just barely started talking to them is premature.
I don't think anyone is dancing. In fact, Vic Carucci just shot this down, which is why i don't follow mike rodak. However i don't think everyone is pessimistic about extending these guys.
Totally different type of 3-4 though, I think he'll do fine in an attacking scheme, which is what we'll be running going forward under Rex.
It's NOT EVEN a 3-4, though. People keep repeating that, and it's something that bothers me for some reason. A 3-4 is only one of the MANY packages and looks this defense will employ. I guess people need to put a convenient label on it, truth be damned.
It's NOT EVEN a 3-4, though. People keep repeating that, and it's something that bothers me for some reason. A 3-4 is only one of the MANY packages and looks this defense will employ. I guess people need to put a convenient label on it, truth be damned.
I don't think anybody has claimed that either Pettine or Ryan run a conventional 34, but to deny that both of them build from a 34 base is ignoring the truth.
YardRat Wall of Fame #56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
The differences are minor, Pettine's schemes are/were considered aggressive. attacking and pressure based. The biggest difference is Rex's tendency to replace a LBer with another dback.
You will find that 2014 Bradham was a product of the Schwartz defense. You'll see he won't be as good this season. And you will see Manny Lawson rise back from the dust.
but but but.... we will never be able to resign bradham, gilmore, glenn and dareus. we are all cap experts. this is what i've learned over the last 2 weeks or so.
Have you watched this team at all in the past 15 years?
cause you're talking like the bills showing glimmers of competence has been the norm ~forever~
My wife told me that if I had a dollar for every girl who found me unattractive, girls would find me VERY attractive.
Comment