I have a RAGING

[ublinkwescore]

Football boner right now. Any one else?

I cant remember the last time we looked this good in our first preseason game.

[ParanoidAndroid]

My wife is satisfied.

[SpikedLemonade]

Drive to a truck stop and find a glory hole in a bathroom.

[POTLAND PSILBYLO]

Maybe he doesn't have to drive?

[ParanoidAndroid]

Enough of the backward angles by receivers after the catch.

[Oaf]

Football boner right now. Any one else?

I cant remember the last time we looked this good in our first preseason game.

It was 2003 or 2004 when we made our massive defensive spending spree.. And that first preseason game, I remember seeing our guys literally leaping over blockers and smashing the RB at times.

We looked good for once. Nervous about our CBs. Good for Darby to get burned a bit.

[OpIv37]

Holy ****, here we go again.

For a decade plus on this board, I've taken **** for criticizing the team for preseason performance. Now, someone comes out with a raging boner for a preseason game that we lost. In all honesty, I haven't seen the game yet so I can't take a position on how well we played. But why hasn't this post been destroyed because "it's only the first preseason game" the way realistic but negative assessments of the first preseason game have been in the past?

[Meathead]

1) me too

c) sadly preseason means ѕhit

year after year, decade after decade, fans get boners or suicidal based on how things looked in preseason ... only to be jolted back to reality and remember what they always forget pre-september:

preseason is meaningless

[Meathead]

first and second teams were amazingly sharp for the first preseason game

even ej looked good, albeit let down by his teammates with two brutal first down drops and two horrendous shotgun snaps, until he short hopped a wide open o'micky after a beautiful scramble. he needs to have fixed that by now

[justasportsfan]

Holy ****, here we go again.

For a decade plus on this board, I've taken **** for criticizing the team for preseason performance. Now, someone comes out with a raging boner for a preseason game that we lost. In all honesty, I haven't seen the game yet so I can't take a position on how well we played. But why hasn't this post been destroyed because "it's only the first preseason game" the way realistic but negative assessments of the first preseason game have been in the past?
Translation: I haven't seen the game it I'll kick and whine since like a baby anyways.Waaaaaaah

[OpIv37]

Translation: I haven't seen the game it I'll kick and whine since like a baby anyways.Waaaaaaah

Once again, you're making it about me.

It's not about me. It's about how supposedly premature negative assessments are summarily dismissed whereas supposedly premature positive assessments are accepted. Nothing I can say or do will change that hypocrisy.

[Ingtar33]

1) me too

c) sadly preseason means ѕhit

year after year, decade after decade, fans get boners or suicidal based on how things looked in preseason ... only to be jolted back to reality and remember what they always forget pre-september:

preseason is meaningless

I don't know. i remember last year coming out of preseason and everyone was lamenting the HORRIFIC offense. that horrific offense kept us out of playoff contention. The offense looked pretty good tonight. Nothing earth shattering but much much better then last seasons train-wreck.

[Meathead]

yeah but if i predict the stock market every year i can always look back and say remember last year when i said xxxxx? well i was right! forget the other twelve years i was wrong ...

preseason is as close to meaningless as it gets. every year there are teams that go oh-fer and teams that go undefeated, only to pull a mr hyde when the games count

i would be thrilled if the first and second units really were as good as they looked, especially the offense. aint counting on it

[feldspar]

I do my best not to speak to guys with raging boners, myself.

[justasportsfan]

Once again, you're making it about me.

It's not about me. It's about how supposedly premature negative assessments are summarily dismissed whereas supposedly premature positive assessments are accepted. Nothing I can say or do will change that hypocrisy.

You were looking for someone to shoot down the original post and then whine when someone shoots down yours ? You call his a premature positive post ?At least he watched the game. What does that make yours even though you haven't seen the game? Nothing but a crybaby post.

[OpIv37]

You were looking for someone to shoot down the original post and then whine when someone shoots down yours ? You call his a premature positive post ?At least he watched the game. What does that make yours even though you haven't seen the game? Nothing but a crybaby post.

Once again, nothing I can say or do will change the hypocrisy in the way supposedly premature positive posts are treated vice the way supposedly premature negative posts are treated. Your attempt to make it about me isn't going to work.

[TacklingDummy]

Looking great, another loss.

[justasportsfan]

Once again, nothing I can say or do will change the hypocrisy in the way supposedly premature positive posts are treated vice the way supposedly premature negative posts are treated. Your attempt to make it about me isn't going to work.
Not my problem you have a problem making distinctions . His post is not the same as yours. His post is made based on what he saw. Yours is based on what you didn't see. I can't dumb it further for you.

[ublinkwescore]

Holy ****, here we go again.

For a decade plus on this board, I've taken **** for criticizing the team for preseason performance. Now, someone comes out with a raging boner for a preseason game that we lost. In all honesty, I haven't seen the game yet so I can't take a position on how well we played. But why hasn't this post been destroyed because "it's only the first preseason game" the way realistic but negative assessments of the first preseason game have been in the past?

If we throw carpenter in there for the first fg attempt, we probably win this game. Our starters did manhandle their starters.they couldn't move the ball until after we had started pulling first stringers. And I never once said this means the playoff drought is over with.

You should probably seek some help guy. Your constant *****ing... we hear it every year, over and over again. Are you seriously going to say that they didn't look a lot better out there today than what we have in recent years in our first game. Cam was playing scared because of the rush. He likely would have got picked at least twice if this was a reg season game. The mistakes were definitely coming.karlos Williams may very well end up being a goal line specialist type of back. I saw him get hit a few times behind the line of scrimmage and still pick up 2 or 3 yards. You are entitled to your opinion, but we all pretty much know what it is.. every single damn time...

[OpIv37]

If we throw carpenter in there for the first fg attempt, we probably win this game. Our starters did manhandle their starters.they couldn't move the ball until after we had started pulling first stringers. And I never once said this means the playoff drought is over with.

You should probably seek some help guy. Your constant *****ing... we hear it every year, over and over again. Are you seriously going to say that they didn't look a lot better out there today than what we have in recent years in our first game. Cam was playing scared because of the rush. He likely would have got picked at least twice if this was a reg season game. The mistakes were definitely coming.karlos Williams may very well end up being a goal line specialist type of back. I saw him get hit a few times behind the line of scrimmage and still pick up 2 or 3 yards. You are entitled to your opinion, but we all pretty much know what it is.. every single damn time...

Yeah, you know what my opinion is every single damn time. You also know what the results have been every damn time, and they've been very damn close to my opinions which were trashed for being supposedly premature.

Once again, I'm out of market and due to some extenuating circumstances, I don't have a DVR. So I haven't seen the game and likely won't. But my comments were not about this game specifically. It was about how apt but negative criticism of this team after the first preseason game is summarily dismissed, whereas positive assessment of the first preseason game (apt or not- I dont know) is summarily accepted.

[ublinkwescore]

4 am tomorrow morning your time guy. Feel free to watch it and perhaps you to might enjoy a raging football boner.

- - - Updated - - -

4 am tomorrow morning your time guy. Feel free to watch it and perhaps you to might enjoy a raging football boner.

[ublinkwescore]

Assuming you are in EST