-
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
Ummmm....why didn't they just cut a WR and spare Meeks, then?YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
Meeks was one of the extra guys I thought would be cut anyhow so that makes no sense. Goodwin is hurt, so that speculation also makes no sense.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for witComment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
Because if they trade a WR they get something in return and if they just waive that player they get nothing.Originally posted by YardRat View Post
Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
So they keep a player they didn't want to anyway (WR) and cut a player they wanted to keep? That's half-assed.Originally posted by X-Era View Post
Not surprising, though, considering how the organization has been running the last 10 months.YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
The way I'm looking at this is they like the WR more the Meeks, but they like Meeks+ what they were going to get for the WR more then the WR. That's not to hard to understand.Originally posted by YardRat View PostComment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
But they weren't going to get anything for the WR...obviously.Originally posted by sudzy View PostYardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
Well, if option A is WR> Meeks and Option B is Meeks + whatever > WR. And your not going to get whatever. Then you go with option A. Which is what they did. It's not rocket science.Originally posted by YardRat View PostComment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
Trying to get value & keep a player is a good play.
Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
If Meeks was that valuable, they'd just cut a receiver and keep him...or ya know hold on to Meeks til tomorrow working a trade/trying to instead of cutting him now.
This entire premise makes zero sense.Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
If Meeks + an unknown (which is likely a very low draft pick) > a WR, than Meeks is > the WR to begin with, value-wise.
"We'd like to keep Meeks, but only if we can snag a pick that we're going to cut next year anyway. Otherwise, we'll go with the WR that is going to be inactive most of the season."
I don't think so.YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
Mike Rodak ✔ @mikerodak
Bills have waived safety Jonathan Meeks after trying to trade him, I’m told. If not claimed, he could re-sign to practice squad.Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
The Bills disagree.Originally posted by YardRat View PostComment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
I'm thinking Swiper/Rodak's version is closer to the truth than Marvez...it makes more sense.Originally posted by sudzy View PostYardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Comment
-
Re: Rumor: Bills tried trade a WR to keep Meeks, no deal so they waived him
So what?
Jonathan Meeks isn't anything to crow about.
If you can't beat out Duke friggin' Williams, you don't belong on an NFL roster. Not even the practice squad.Disclaimer: The sentiment expressed in this post is strictly for entertainment purposes only.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
- There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host. Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
- Please use this thread to report any issues you come across http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Tweet
Comment