Gilmore wants Gronk

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SeatownBillsFan21
    Registered User
    • Mar 2004
    • 2149

    Gilmore wants Gronk

    Love the confidence can't wait till Sunday

    http://bills.buffalonews.com/2015/09/15/stephon-gilmore-on-gronkowski-i-want-him/


    Find all the latest Rotoworld fantasy sports news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.
    Last edited by SeatownBillsFan21; 09-16-2015, 12:37 AM.
  • feldspar
    Registered User
    • Mar 2007
    • 13620

    #2
    Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

    Who doesn't want Gronk?

    Comment

    • Swiper
      Legendary Zoner
      • Sep 2010
      • 33105

      #3
      Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

      As soon as somebody starts to do a fair job of covering Gronkowski, then Brady will turn to Campbell. Everybody knows Brady likes to utilize two TEs. He didn't have to do that much vs Pittsburgh. And how much would the Patriots love to see Campbell get to scorch his own team. I hope they have adequate coverage for both guys.

      Comment

      • kscdogbillsfan1221
        Registered User
        • Nov 2007
        • 5652

        #4
        Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

        Originally posted by Swiper View Post
        As soon as somebody starts to do a fair job of covering Gronkowski, then Brady will turn to Campbell. Everybody knows Brady likes to utilize two TEs. He didn't have to do that much vs Pittsburgh. And how much would the Patriots love to see Campbell get to scorch his own team. I hope they have adequate coverage for both guys.
        whos Campbell? Do you mean chandler?
        I came.
        I saw.
        I conquered.

        Comment

        • YardRat
          Well, lookie here...
          • Dec 2004
          • 86167

          #5
          Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

          Originally posted by Swiper View Post
          As soon as somebody starts to do a fair job of covering Gronkowski, then Brady will turn to Campbell. Everybody knows Brady likes to utilize two TEs. He didn't have to do that much vs Pittsburgh. And how much would the Patriots love to see Campbell get to scorch his own team. I hope they have adequate coverage for both guys.
          I think he's going to target Butch Rolle myself.
          YardRat Wall of Fame
          #56 DARRYL TALLEY
          #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

          Comment

          • Swiper
            Legendary Zoner
            • Sep 2010
            • 33105

            #6
            Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

            LOL. How many times have I done that now? More than once. Sorry for that. And I claimed to be a fan of his. Guess not so much.

            Comment

            • YardRat
              Well, lookie here...
              • Dec 2004
              • 86167

              #7
              Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

              Gilmore is coach Rex Ryan's new Darrelle Revis and graded out as PFF's No. 1 cover corner Week 1, breaking up four passes against the Colts.

              - - - Updated - - -

              I'd rather cover Gronk than Edelmen too.
              YardRat Wall of Fame
              #56 DARRYL TALLEY
              #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

              Comment

              • Swiper
                Legendary Zoner
                • Sep 2010
                • 33105

                #8
                Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                I thought Gilmore was had on one pass, but otherwise thought "wow this guy is really coming along."

                Is this the team of dreadlocks though?

                Comment

                • Topas
                  German smartass
                  • Feb 2014
                  • 880

                  #9
                  Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                  Originally posted by Swiper View Post
                  I thought Gilmore was had on one pass, but otherwise thought "wow this guy is really coming along."

                  Is this the team of dreadlocks though?
                  Yes, I think the strategy is that the dreads are so long that one cannot see the number anymore and the offense gets confused.
                  Ok, that only works in case they have their back turned to the QB, but maybe now everybody works in trail technique.
                  Although this will make rushing the passer quite difficult

                  Comment

                  • trapezeus
                    Legendary Zoner
                    • Oct 2004
                    • 19525

                    #10
                    Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                    Good. Use chandler. The more you use him, the more turnovers he provides

                    Comment

                    • DraftBoy
                      Administrator
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 107452

                      #11
                      Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                      I would rather utilize Bradham and Brown to cover Gronk and Chandler than Gilmore. Gilmore needs to stay on Edelman. Also Aaron Williams needs to get his head in the game and read the seam route and make a play on the ball.
                      COMING SOON...
                      Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                      We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      • Jan Reimers
                        Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                        • May 2003
                        • 17353

                        #12
                        Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                        Makes me think of the old adage, "Be careful what you wish for."
                        Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                        Comment

                        • Mahdi
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 10585

                          #13
                          Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                          Originally posted by DraftBoy View Post
                          I would rather utilize Bradham and Brown to cover Gronk and Chandler than Gilmore. Gilmore needs to stay on Edelman. Also Aaron Williams needs to get his head in the game and read the seam route and make a play on the ball.
                          I think Gilmore struggles with smaller, shiftier WRs. Roby on Edelman would be a good match.

                          Comment

                          • Meathead
                            Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 21349

                            #14
                            Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                            just get whoever is covering gronk to jingle some keys in front of his face
                            One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                            Comment

                            • DraftBoy
                              Administrator
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 107452

                              #15
                              Re: Gilmore wants Gronk

                              Originally posted by Mahdi View Post
                              I think Gilmore struggles with smaller, shiftier WRs. Roby on Edelman would be a good match.
                              I think in our current scheme which allows him to play on the line and jam we could see that improve. What makes Edelman so effective is his release and cuts, if you can neutralize his release through a jam then you take away part of his game. Gilmore's size and strength in our scheme should allow for that.
                              COMING SOON...
                              Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                              We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X