Harvin, Woods, Clay

[Mike]

Harvin, Woods, & Clay only saw 9 targets today.

Either they completely over rated and aren't getting open or the QB can't find the open WR.

At bare minimum, these 3 guys were suppose to be studs, yet week after week they barely contribute.

[Ed]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Clay leads the team in receptions, yards, receiving TDs, first downs, and plays of 20+ yards. He's contributing.

[Oaf]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

I don't think Woods or Harvin are dominant WRs, but they can make plays when given the opportunity. Hopefully Watkins can become our OBJ..

[feldspar]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Harvin, Woods, & Clay only saw 9 targets today.

Either they completely over rated and aren't getting open or the QB can't find the open WR.

At bare minimum, these 3 guys were suppose to be studs, yet week after week they barely contribute.

Clay is 7th in the league at Tight End for both catches and yardage. He's two catches away from being tied for 3rd in receptions at his position.

Percy Harvin is doing alright and has made some clutch catches.

Dunno who ever said Woods was supposed to be a stud? He's more of a complimentary player.

The thing we missed most today was the running game. This whole team would look a lot different with a healthy McCoy. Watkins being in there opens up opportunities for other receivers as well. We missed him today.

I wouldn't go around complaining about stats after a win, either.

[Topas]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

I think TT should look more often in Woods direction.
I am sure, if Woods played in NE he would put up better numbers than Welker.

[Mike]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

I think TT should look more often in Woods direction.
I am sure, if Woods played in NE he would put up better numbers than Welker.

Welker is a borderline HOF player. Woods isn't anywhere near his caliber. Maybe he be Edleman like.

[Mike]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Overall, Clay remind me of Vernon Davis, both good Vernon Davis and bad Vernon Davis.

[Skooby]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Overall, Clay remind me of Vernon Davis, both good Vernon Davis and bad Vernon Davis.

Clay is hurt as well, just to be clear here.

[swiper]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

I don't think it's the players. At least those three players.

It's the game plan and the QB trying to (or failing at) carrying it out.

Only 9 targets? Well if they could have made a couple of first downs in the first half, those three would have seen a lot more targets.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

The Bills had 100 passing yards. Tyrod had zero time on about 90% of his drop backs. I wouldn't call any of them over rated.

Until the Bills can find a way to shore up the O-line and give the QB time to throw, this is going to be the norm.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Harvin is useless without Watkins playing opposite him. Might as well free cap and use Goodwin who is cheaper.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Until those guys get a real QB their stats will suffer.

Throw Watkins into that mix too.

[OpIv37]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Clay didn't do much yesterday but he's still played really well this season.

Harvin was supposed to be the 3rd WR and he and Tyrod have had some success. Overall both are good pickups.

Woods has been disappointing this year.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Clay didn't do much yesterday but he's still played really well this season.

Harvin was supposed to be the 3rd WR and he and Tyrod have had some success. Overall both are good pickups.

Woods has been disappointing this year.

I think Woods is only as good as his Qb . He plays hard and is one of the best wr blockers. Harvin is not worth 4 million.

[Mad Bomber]

Re: Harvin, Woods, Clay

Woods did throw some great blocks on two of TT's big runs.