Mace
11-06-2015, 08:20 AM
Read them in a few spots, Ryan and "DC" Thurman. Tried to ignore it, aggravates me too much. No ignoring it.
General summary : http://www.buffalorumblings.com/bills-news-notes/2015/11/6/9674032/rex-ryan-buffalo-bills-defense-still-not-seeing-eye-to-eye
So essentially Ryan said he meant to adapt, but won't, and the players need execute (ala Kyle Williams in coverage), need to be comfortable in the system but gave them a week off that may have gotten them more comfortable in his junk system. His creative solution appears to be not changing anything.
What aggravated me more, is that in the one article : http://bills.buffalonews.com/2015/11/04/execution-not-just-simplicity-the-defensive-key/ , he says :
“I always say this, the brilliance isn’t in – and this is where some of my mentors in the past,” Ryan said, “obviously my dad, a Bill Parcells, a Bill Walsh, a Sid Gillman, a Paul Brown, the real innovators in this game – it wasn’t necessarily about, the scheme sure, is one thing. But it’s the execution of the play call. It’s not the play call itself. If you just put out your call sheet and say I’m going to out-coach you this way or out-do whatever, it’s the execution of the calls.
If he paid any attention to his Dad whatever, he'd have noticed Buddy always moved Dan Hampton with the Bears to the weakest offensive linemen. Wannstedt kept doing the same ineffective stuff and said it was about execution too. That whole quote also bothered me, because if you read it, it's Jauron era gibberish speak that comes when you aren't sure what you're trying to say.
I sure just wish the guy would show some sign of learning and adapting.
“You’re always constantly making adjustments on what you do and what you ask your players to do,” Ryan said. “Getting familiar with your players. Sometimes you assume when you walk in, you’re going to exactly what I did in Baltimore, I’m going to do here. This is a player-driven system. It’s not a square-peg-in-a-round-hole system. Ours is very multiple. We’ll take advantage of our personnel in trying to give our players the best chance to be successful and we’ll always do that.
Kyle Williams or Mario Williams in coverage isn't a square peg in a round hole, nah, that's putting them in the best position to succeed, because you're so familiar with your players.
Woeful.
General summary : http://www.buffalorumblings.com/bills-news-notes/2015/11/6/9674032/rex-ryan-buffalo-bills-defense-still-not-seeing-eye-to-eye
So essentially Ryan said he meant to adapt, but won't, and the players need execute (ala Kyle Williams in coverage), need to be comfortable in the system but gave them a week off that may have gotten them more comfortable in his junk system. His creative solution appears to be not changing anything.
What aggravated me more, is that in the one article : http://bills.buffalonews.com/2015/11/04/execution-not-just-simplicity-the-defensive-key/ , he says :
“I always say this, the brilliance isn’t in – and this is where some of my mentors in the past,” Ryan said, “obviously my dad, a Bill Parcells, a Bill Walsh, a Sid Gillman, a Paul Brown, the real innovators in this game – it wasn’t necessarily about, the scheme sure, is one thing. But it’s the execution of the play call. It’s not the play call itself. If you just put out your call sheet and say I’m going to out-coach you this way or out-do whatever, it’s the execution of the calls.
If he paid any attention to his Dad whatever, he'd have noticed Buddy always moved Dan Hampton with the Bears to the weakest offensive linemen. Wannstedt kept doing the same ineffective stuff and said it was about execution too. That whole quote also bothered me, because if you read it, it's Jauron era gibberish speak that comes when you aren't sure what you're trying to say.
I sure just wish the guy would show some sign of learning and adapting.
“You’re always constantly making adjustments on what you do and what you ask your players to do,” Ryan said. “Getting familiar with your players. Sometimes you assume when you walk in, you’re going to exactly what I did in Baltimore, I’m going to do here. This is a player-driven system. It’s not a square-peg-in-a-round-hole system. Ours is very multiple. We’ll take advantage of our personnel in trying to give our players the best chance to be successful and we’ll always do that.
Kyle Williams or Mario Williams in coverage isn't a square peg in a round hole, nah, that's putting them in the best position to succeed, because you're so familiar with your players.
Woeful.