Just wondering what the general consensus is with regards to Roman.
Personally, I would rather see a more traditional OC brought in because I am seeing that Roman's system is way too predictable which is why it stalls so often.
It seems the system only works because of Tyrod's ability to break the pocket and run. Without that its a very easy offense to defend if you're a decent DC or defensive unit. In fact I just don't see where Roman has a real influence on our attack at all. Everything is based on the threat of Tyrod running. Even when he isn't scrambling almost every snap involves the option.
If the idea is to make the playoffs I don't see it happening with this gimmick offense and even if we do make it to the playoffs, when is the last time such a gimmicky offense made it to the SB?
That is not even considering the fact that at some point Tyrod is going to get injured again with all these drive saving runs.
Would rather have a Gary Kubiak type offense that emphasizes boots, moving the pocket and the run game.
Personally, I would rather see a more traditional OC brought in because I am seeing that Roman's system is way too predictable which is why it stalls so often.
It seems the system only works because of Tyrod's ability to break the pocket and run. Without that its a very easy offense to defend if you're a decent DC or defensive unit. In fact I just don't see where Roman has a real influence on our attack at all. Everything is based on the threat of Tyrod running. Even when he isn't scrambling almost every snap involves the option.
If the idea is to make the playoffs I don't see it happening with this gimmick offense and even if we do make it to the playoffs, when is the last time such a gimmicky offense made it to the SB?
That is not even considering the fact that at some point Tyrod is going to get injured again with all these drive saving runs.
Would rather have a Gary Kubiak type offense that emphasizes boots, moving the pocket and the run game.
Comment