PDA

View Full Version : Bradford?



malvado78
12-30-2015, 06:25 PM
With Kelly Gone Bradford has recognized that his place in Philly is uncertain. Would you bring him in? At what price?

Mace
12-30-2015, 06:27 PM
No way. He is brittle and not any good.

malvado78
12-30-2015, 06:38 PM
I figured he would fit right in with clay and Easley...

swiper
12-30-2015, 06:42 PM
Any upgrade is a good one. In preseason 2015, I would say Bradford > Taylor. And he still may be, but at this point not enough. I agree with Mace. Let Taylor have another year unless there is a significant upgrade at the position. And Bradford isn't that. And spends too much time off the field.

If The Bills could get Mettenberger for a back-up to Taylor, I would like that I think.

BillsImpossible
12-30-2015, 06:43 PM
No.

The Bills have to sign a safety, a #2 wide receiver, Incognito and Glenn first before they sign a backup quarterback.

swiper
12-30-2015, 06:45 PM
They have a fine #2 receiver. They have a starting QB who won't throw to him. It's one of Taylor's many problems.

YardRat
12-30-2015, 06:46 PM
No.

Mace
12-30-2015, 06:48 PM
I figured he would fit right in with clay and Easley...

There's that, yes. It would have a harmony. I'd trade them a more injured guy and a less injured guy and see if we could get one of their least injured guys thrown in, maybe including a draft pick likely to be injured if we could get a worse one.

paladin warrior
12-30-2015, 07:48 PM
Forget it . No!!

justasportsfan
12-30-2015, 08:15 PM
They have a fine #2 receiver. They have a starting QB who won't throw to him. It's one of Taylor's many problems.

Woods isn't a deep threat but he runs great routes which is useless when your QB has no short to mid passing game. Even Clay was useless with TT.

TT and Watkins is like watching JP and Lee Evans

Mr. Miyagi
12-30-2015, 09:24 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

PuntKicker
12-30-2015, 10:37 PM
Woods isn't a deep threat but he runs great routes which is useless when your QB has no short to mid passing game. Even Clay was useless with TT.

TT and Watkins is like watching JP and Lee Evans

I can't get over the irony of finally replacing a string of guys who were called Captain Checkdown with a guy who only throws deep. Hopefully TT can mix it up more next season.

DraftBoy
12-31-2015, 05:53 AM
They have a fine #2 receiver. They have a starting QB who won't throw to him. It's one of Taylor's many problems.

Who? They have a fine slot WR in Woods, but I wouldn't say he's a fine option for #2.

swiper
12-31-2015, 06:02 AM
I would.

Buffalogic
12-31-2015, 06:55 AM
Rather have Tyrod. And we pay him peanuts.

Victor7
12-31-2015, 09:04 AM
As a backup ? Sure. He's better than EJ.

As a replacement for TT ? Nah bro.

He would however fit right in with the hot club guys in Clay, Harvin, Goodwin, Easley and Karlos.

Bill Cody
12-31-2015, 09:15 AM
You don't pay a backup what Bradford will command period. And Bradford is brittle and not very good. So no.

Mr. Cynical
12-31-2015, 04:19 PM
Chris Chandler 2.0. So, no.

DynaPaul
01-01-2016, 08:05 AM
I don't see any reason why we would want to sign him unless it's as a cheap backup.