Bradford? - BillsZone.com - Buffalo Bills Fan Zone

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!

X

malvado78

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 481
- Share
- Tweet
#1

Bradford?

12-30-2015, 06:25 PM

With Kelly Gone Bradford has recognized that his place in Philly is uncertain. Would you bring him in? At what price?
Tags: None
Mace

Haha...yeah you think so ?

Join Date: Mar 2013

Posts: 20315
- Share
- Tweet
#2

12-30-2015, 06:27 PM

Re: Bradford?

No way. He is brittle and not any good.
Comment
malvado78

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 481
- Share
- Tweet
#3

12-30-2015, 06:38 PM

Re: Bradford?

I figured he would fit right in with clay and Easley...
👍 3
Comment
swiper

Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2010

Posts: 33105
- Share
- Tweet
#4

12-30-2015, 06:42 PM

Re: Bradford?

Any upgrade is a good one. In preseason 2015, I would say Bradford > Taylor. And he still may be, but at this point not enough. I agree with Mace. Let Taylor have another year unless there is a significant upgrade at the position. And Bradford isn't that. And spends too much time off the field.

If The Bills could get Mettenberger for a back-up to Taylor, I would like that I think.
👍 1
Comment
BillsImpossible

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2013

Posts: 16206
- Share
- Tweet
#5

12-30-2015, 06:43 PM

Re: Bradford?

No.

The Bills have to sign a safety, a #2 wide receiver, Incognito and Glenn first before they sign a backup quarterback.
Comment
swiper

Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2010

Posts: 33105
- Share
- Tweet
#6

12-30-2015, 06:45 PM

Re: Bradford?

They have a fine #2 receiver. They have a starting QB who won't throw to him. It's one of Taylor's many problems.
Comment
YardRat

Well, lookie here...

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 86147
- Share
- Tweet
#7

12-30-2015, 06:46 PM

Re: Bradford?

No.

YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
👍 1
Comment
Mace

Haha...yeah you think so ?

Join Date: Mar 2013

Posts: 20315
- Share
- Tweet
#8

12-30-2015, 06:48 PM

Re: Bradford?

Originally posted by malvado78 View Post

I figured he would fit right in with clay and Easley...

There's that, yes. It would have a harmony. I'd trade them a more injured guy and a less injured guy and see if we could get one of their least injured guys thrown in, maybe including a draft pick likely to be injured if we could get a worse one.
Comment
paladin warrior

All-Pro Zoner

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 3272
- Share
- Tweet
#9

12-30-2015, 07:48 PM

Re: Bradford?

Forget it . No!!
Comment
justasportsfan

Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 71579
- Share
- Tweet
#10

12-30-2015, 08:15 PM

Re: Bradford?

Originally posted by Swiper View Post

They have a fine #2 receiver. They have a starting QB who won't throw to him. It's one of Taylor's many problems.

Woods isn't a deep threat but he runs great routes which is useless when your QB has no short to mid passing game. Even Clay was useless with TT.

TT and Watkins is like watching JP and Lee Evans

https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/
Comment
Mr. Miyagi

Lecter's Little Bitch

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 53616
- Share
- Tweet
#11

12-30-2015, 09:24 PM

Re: Bradford?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Comment
PuntKicker

Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2015

Posts: 33
- Share
- Tweet
#12

12-30-2015, 10:37 PM

Re: Bradford?

Originally posted by justasportsfan View Post

Woods isn't a deep threat but he runs great routes which is useless when your QB has no short to mid passing game. Even Clay was useless with TT.

TT and Watkins is like watching JP and Lee Evans

I can't get over the irony of finally replacing a string of guys who were called Captain Checkdown with a guy who only throws deep. Hopefully TT can mix it up more next season.
👍 1
Comment
DraftBoy

Administrator

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 107452
- Share
- Tweet
#13

12-31-2015, 05:53 AM

Re: Bradford?

Originally posted by Swiper View Post

They have a fine #2 receiver. They have a starting QB who won't throw to him. It's one of Taylor's many problems.

Who? They have a fine slot WR in Woods, but I wouldn't say he's a fine option for #2.

COMING SOON...

Originally posted by Dr.Lecter

We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
👍 1
Comment
swiper

Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2010

Posts: 33105
- Share
- Tweet
#14

12-31-2015, 06:02 AM

Re: Bradford?

I would.
Comment
Buffalogic

Rumblin' Stumblin' Bumblin'

Join Date: Feb 2006

Posts: 5345
- Share
- Tweet
#15

12-31-2015, 06:55 AM

Re: Bradford?

Rather have Tyrod. And we pay him peanuts.
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...

X