Just a thought, so far I have heard great things from Travis Brown outta camp, is it possible if Johnson shows anything at all that they will cut Van Pelt and go with Brown #2, and Johnson #3?
Van Pelt to be cut?
Collapse
X
-
super ball? anyways, i agree. hes been with this team for a while now and has always been a descent backup. and with the emergence of no-name qbs nowadays (maddox, brady, feeley, bulger, etc.) i wouldnt be surprised if we kept all 3 (van pelt, jason johnson, and travis brown).the dude abides
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mypoorfriendme
super ball? .
Originally posted by mypoorfriendme
anyways, i agree. hes been with this team for a while now and has always been a descent backup. and with the emergence of no-name qbs nowadays (maddox, brady, feeley, bulger, etc.) i wouldnt be surprised if we kept all 3 (van pelt, jason johnson, and travis brown).
Comment
-
-
Brown has very little game experience, and Johnson is a raw, untested, undrafted FA. I think, for this year at least, AVP stays and Johnson - providing he shows something - goes on the practice squad.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mypoorfriendme
super ball? anyways, i agree.
Brown is more mobile, 7 years younger, VP is 33.
We don't, or shouldn't, hang onto players simply b/c they're "nice guys"! You retain those who would do the best job in relief, NOT those whom 'you would like to see do well.'
Originally posted by Jan Reimers
Brown has very little game experience, and Johnson is a raw, untested, undrafted FA. I think, for this year at least, AVP stays and Johnson - providing he shows something - goes on the practice squad.
Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!
Then let's go to Disneyworld!
GO BILLS!!!
Comment
-
-
I believe we need more experience at backup QB than a duo of Brown and Johnson would provide. We seem to be taking a long look at Brown as the number 2 guy, which is good, and if Johnson winds up on the PS, we will have 2 younger guys for the future. I simply feel it's at least a year early to jetison AVP.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment
-
-
Let's say we keep DB, TB and Johnson, and - God forbid - DB goes down. We then have TB, Johnson and ?. Is anyone comfortable with that? If you are, stop griping about depth problems at other positions.
It makes far more sense to keep DB, TB and AVP, with Johnson on the PS - for this season. Not forever. Johnson can develop on the PS, and perhaps be a viable 3rd QB candidate next year. Why the rush to axe AVP?
BTW - and I hope I'm wrong - I don't see our future QB in either Brown or Johnson.Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment
-
-
I'm not "comfortable" w/ Drew in there!
I'd rather have Blake, Kerry Collins, or any number of other QBs.
The team is evaluating Brown as they say they are!
You, along w/ everyone else, seem to have no problem drinking the FO/partyline Koolaid when it suits your likes (i.e. Drew), so how about accepting that same standard when they are finished assessing Brown this preseason! If Drew's so marvelous, then you'd have to agree that they are top evaluators of QB talent, eh!
If anyone should be concerned, it should be me, not you.
Just an inane suggestion...
Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!
Then let's go to Disneyworld!
GO BILLS!!!
Comment
-
Comment