Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

[jimmifli]

Hope it's not a trend.

[feldspar]

Re: Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

Sorry, but you have a million dollar fine coming from the NFL for this post.

[Guest]

Re: Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

Good teams get the close calls.

We ain't that.

[YardRat]

Re: Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

It's been a trend for a long time.

[chernobylwraiths]

Re: Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

Good teams get the close calls.

We ain't that.

Close calls?

[Mouldsie]

Re: Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

Great post

[Arm of Harm]

Re: Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

If you look closely at the picture, it seems as though one of the refs is holding a toy football player in his hand. (Jersey number 10.)

[Victor7]

Re: Last week: One DILDO on the field, This week: Seven

Its not about "getting the calls" ..... I can understand them ****ing up judgment calls like PI's, holds and the sorts. They shouldn't but whatever. But the administrative part of the game ?? The delay of game that took the fg off the board was huge. That is not judgement. That is basic stuff. They ****ed up and ****ed us in the process.

Sherman decimating Powell on the 4th down play even though the ball was 35 yards away on the other side of the field is not a judgement call. And the ref was looking straight at them.