Romo anyone?

[BillsFanCupp38]

He could be available... Just a thought

[Mace]

Re: Romo anyone?

No.

He needs to not be running and not be getting hit. He'll go to an established passing offense and get hurt again anyway.

[djjimkelly]

Re: Romo anyone?

as a stop gap while we draft one.


id be interested. while tyrod played well against seattle that was his ceiling. which IMO is no where near good enough

[Mace]

Re: Romo anyone?

as a stop gap while we draft one.


id be interested. while tyrod played well against seattle that was his ceiling. which IMO is no where near good enough

But they still don't want a passer who can't get hit.

[OpIv37]

Re: Romo anyone?

No. No. **** No.

We've tried the stopgap retread in the past- Bledsoe, Holcomb, Fitz come to mind. It'll buy a few wins but not enough to right the ship.

[Mace]

Re: Romo anyone?

No. No. **** No.

We've tried the stopgap retread in the past- Bledsoe, Holcomb, Fitz come to mind. It'll buy a few wins but not enough to right the ship.

You forgot Orton, Thad Lewis, and the legendary Kevin Kolb, Matt Cassel, Tarvaris Jackson, Matt Simms, and some guy I forgot in the early 2000's. We had some other guy more recently that I forgot too, though Jimmy Clausen hasn't been here yet.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: Romo anyone?

The roster is full of mobile QBs, so even entertaining the thought of bringing in any pocket passer, let alone Tony Romo is ridiculous.

He's injury prone, past his prime and simply doesn't fit here.

[Guest]

Re: Romo anyone?

FU

[Luisito23]

Re: Romo anyone?

Haven't we had this convo before?...

[pmoon6]

Re: Romo anyone?

at this thread.

[Topas]

Re: Romo anyone?

a few thoughts.
- if our O is so set on being run by a mobile QB and we cannot adjust, then it really makes no sense. But I think having such an inflexible O is stupid.
- I think Romo is way better than any of this stopgap QBs mentioned below. Also better than Bledsoe.
- Is Romo really that injury prone?

Actually I could imagine him here. But my problem is that this would lower our draft pick because we win more games and would extend Rex's stay here longer than needed. So I would pass. But not due to Romo not being good enough.

[Novacane]

Re: Romo anyone?

I'll take him for my fantasy team.

[Mahdi]

Re: Romo anyone?

If Romo were available and it would be do-able under the cap then we would be stupid not to get him.

He would take our offense to the next level. No one wanted Carson Palmer either after Oakland.

This is all assuming that Tyrod has proven he is not a franchise QB.

[The Jokeman]

Re: Romo anyone?

If Romo were available and it would be do-able under the cap then we would be stupid not to get him.

He would take our offense to the next level. No one wanted Carson Palmer either after Oakland.

This is all assuming that Tyrod has proven he is not a franchise QB.

Or he could become another Drew Bledsoe. The thing that worries me about Romo is inability to stay healthy and think our offensive line might not be as great as we think as sometimes Tyrod's athleticism allows him to avoid most QBs be sacked on. That said I'm not sold on Tyrod as a QB as think he's too slow to read things and lack of height prevents him from finding/making passing lanes in the middle of the field.

[IlluminatusUIUC]

Re: Romo anyone?

Romo is miles and miles better than Orton, Fitz, Holcomb, and the other retreads mentioned in this thread. That said, coming here would be a massive step down in both his OL and his receiving targets, and he gets so repeatedly and severely injured I'm worried the guy might die on the field. Plus he is expensive as hell because Dallas restructured him 50 times. So no.