If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
I am elated we won but GW made some bonehead decisions!
People blaming GW even though they won the game are likely the same ones saying bottom line they lost the other games. There are a lot of pros and cons to going for 2 in that situation. I would assume the chart says go for two. The Vikes were forced to kick the extra point instead of going for two themselves, which would have won the game for them in regulation. Can't have it both ways. Enjoy the win.
Originally posted by Kelly The Dog People blaming GW even though they won the game are likely the same ones saying bottom line they lost the other games. There are a lot of pros and cons to going for 2 in that situation. I would assume the chart says go for two. The Vikes were forced to kick the extra point instead of going for two themselves, which would have won the game for them in regulation. Can't have it both ways. Enjoy the win.
Bull Kelly! I was praising the play last week. I thought he did a decent job last week. When he makes bonehead decisions we have the right to point them out. I said I am elated they won! That does not mean I need to drink GW's purple koolaid!
Secondly there is no pro for going for the 2 point in that situation! None! At best it would have forced them to make an extra point on their last TD which they did! Hollis' last FG would have won the game. That was a stupid decision on his part! Period!
No it was nto stupid and the reason is. You got Doug Brien a kicker who has missed 2 straight PAT's and your putting a ton of pressure on him to make this PAT and give his team the lead. PLus then Holli's 54 yarder wins it. It made sense to me. I would have done the same.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Originally posted by Winfield_26 and give his team the lead. PLus then Holli's 54 yarder wins it.
You just made my point WInfield! Hollis' 54 yarder wins it if GW DOES NOT go for the 2!
Oh well we won so I will give the guy a pass this week and hope he learns from his mistake. He needs to throw that stupid chart about when to go for 2 out and consider the game situation!
Not to side with anyone, but I noticed he still can't call a challenge. He got lucky on that challenge last week! It's about the only thing that bothers me regarding GW's decisions.
I didn't come here to fight, I hate fighting. Life is way too short to spend it on fighting! Go fight with yourself, one of you will eventually win!
Tweet
Comment