So, it's no big secret to anyone here that rumors broke late last week that the Bills were moving on from Tyrod.
Here's the problem: the HC didn't have any input into that decision because, well, we didn't have one. So, how much say should the HC have in personnel decisions?
I'll say this: I'm not the egotistical type that's going to get pissed off if the higher-ups don't take my advice every time, but I was hired because I have a specific skill set and I get frustrated if managers with more generalized skill sets make decisions without asking my input. And my skill set isn't nearly as unique or valuable as an NFL level coach.
Maybe it makes no difference, I don't know. But I just don't see how the FO making personnel decisions without input from a HC could be good for attracting coaching candidates or the relationship between the FO and the new coach.
Here's the problem: the HC didn't have any input into that decision because, well, we didn't have one. So, how much say should the HC have in personnel decisions?
I'll say this: I'm not the egotistical type that's going to get pissed off if the higher-ups don't take my advice every time, but I was hired because I have a specific skill set and I get frustrated if managers with more generalized skill sets make decisions without asking my input. And my skill set isn't nearly as unique or valuable as an NFL level coach.
Maybe it makes no difference, I don't know. But I just don't see how the FO making personnel decisions without input from a HC could be good for attracting coaching candidates or the relationship between the FO and the new coach.
Comment