If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
He says that the reason why the NFL would take out leaping is because owners don't want to lose games because a player jumped over the line. Are you seriously this dump Michael? Why the **** would they of made extra points harder if this was the case? Why would blocking kicks be legal at all if this was the case
I hate the direction the NFL is going, but someone needs to get the Seahawks along with the bennets to shut the **** up. There is a lot to say about the NFL but they are grasping for things to ***** about and taking advantage of the nfls image to make them always appear smart. I truly believe the Seahawks are going to implode because of their team is being run, its getting out of hand.
Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions
He says that the reason why the NFL would take out leaping is because owners don't want to lose games because a player jumped over the line. Are you seriously this dump Michael? Why the **** would they of made extra points harder if this was the case? Why would blocking kicks be legal at all if this was the case
I hate the direction the NFL is going, but someone needs to get the Seahawks along with the bennets to shut the **** up. There is a lot to say about the NFL but they are grasping for things to ***** about and taking advantage of the nfls image to make them always appear smart. I truly believe the Seahawks are going to implode because of their team is being run, its getting out of hand.
He says that the reason why the NFL would take out leaping is because owners don't want to lose games because a player jumped over the line. Are you seriously this dump Michael? Why the **** would they of made extra points harder if this was the case? Why would blocking kicks be legal at all if this was the case
I hate the direction the NFL is going, but someone needs to get the Seahawks along with the bennets to shut the **** up. There is a lot to say about the NFL but they are grasping for things to ***** about and taking advantage of the nfls image to make them always appear smart. I truly believe the Seahawks are going to implode because of their team is being run, its getting out of hand.
Can you explain why he's wrong and why he's an idiot?
Can you explain why he's wrong and why he's an idiot?
Do you really think 32 to owners have that much of an issue with a play that rarely ever works, that mostly when used leads to a penalty for offsides, and that is just one out of multiple ways to block kicks. Rather than seeing a 200-230 lb man leaping over a player who has his head down at the snap and that if their cleats hit them they can get severely in injured
I really don't see leaping or player safety as the issue. They're just trying to get that dumb jump over the center on a FG play out of the game. Why don't they just say that.
Lou Saban: You can get it done, you can get it done. And what’s more, you’ve gotta get it done.
Omg this is such a conspiracy theory. There is not benefit for the owners to agree on this, their team can do it too!!! It's not even an exploit. It usually hurts their team when used
Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions
Do you really think 32 to owners have that much of an issue with a play that rarely ever works, that mostly when used leads to a penalty for offsides, and that is just one out of multiple ways to block kicks. Rather than seeing a 200-230 lb man leaping over a player who has his head down at the snap and that if their cleats hit them they can get severely in injured
You put a lot of words in my mouth there. I just asked you to explain your premise.
The rule change that irritates me (and correct me if I'm wrong, I'm basing my opinion on information from a radio interview with Mike Pereira) is the one that further defines a WR as being in a 'defenseless' position as soon as the ball is snapped and they begin to run their route, even within the 5-yard chuck zone. Receivers are going to be virtually untouchable, and yet nothing was done in kind for defensive players so a Jarvis Landry-type hit on AW is still 'OK'. To me, that's bull**** and is a clear indication that the league is truly more concerned about offense and points than they are about player safety. Also, John Murphy and Donald Jones are dumbasses for not bringing that factoid up during the interview.
YardRat Wall of Fame #56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
You put a lot of words in my mouth there. I just asked you to explain your premise.
Are you paying any attention to the narrative of the conversation? You asked why do I think HE is wrong. I explained directing everything at what HE said. I didn't put any words in your mouth, but I did assume you were defending him because I made it clear why i thought he was wrong in the op
Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions
The rule change that irritates me (and correct me if I'm wrong, I'm basing my opinion on information from a radio interview with Mike Pereira) is the one that further defines a WR as being in a 'defenseless' position as soon as the ball is snapped and they begin to run their route, even within the 5-yard chuck zone. Receivers are going to be virtually untouchable, and yet nothing was done in kind for defensive players so a Jarvis Landry-type hit on AW is still 'OK'. To me, that's bull**** and is a clear indication that the league is truly more concerned about offense and points than they are about player safety. Also, John Murphy and Donald Jones are dumbasses for not bringing that factoid up during the interview.
I do have to say though, it seems like every single concussion you see is from a defenseless WR. It will be interesting to see an NFL where only ballcarriers can be laid out, and CBs have to attack the football
Not only that but a Safety should be always aiming at a players mid section not their upper half
Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions
Tweet
Comment