If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
San Fran may get some bites and be able to swing something early, but I wouldn't expect any movement from the other teams until the picks start coming off the board.
YardRat Wall of Fame #56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
San Fran may get some bites and be able to swing something early, but I wouldn't expect any movement from the other teams until the picks start coming off the board.
Agreed.
It's just letting the other 31 teams know " Call and we'll listen "
Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
There are obviously more teams that want to trade down than want to trade up. It will take exactly the right circumstances to pull it off. Teams higher up will charge more to switch, so the team wanting to trade up will be doing so to draft a higher rated prospect. For Buffalo, being in the tenth spot, they won't be charging as high a price. The problem is many experts think this is a deep draft at a number of positions with a dearth of high end talent. Thus, at #10 there may not be a player left that teams are going to want to give up picks for by the time Buffalo is on the clock. If a trade happens, it won't happen until Buffalo is on the clock, and it most likely depends on an elite prospect unexpectedly slipping at a position where Buffalo does not have a great need.
I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
We should state at 10 and take the best available. Our team has too many needs.
If they have to many needs, shouldn't they want to trade down, for more picks? The reason to stay at ten, is because they need more studs. They only have one and they traded for him. But, drafting in the top ten for years, hasn't helped them find any.
New England. Their 1st pick isn't until the 3rd round. Belichick figures the Bills will be dumb enough to give them pick 10 if he promises them his top 3rd rounder & sends Gillislee back. He's even willing to let us keep their 5th rounder. Whaley is considering the offer.
New England. Their 1st pick isn't until the 3rd round. Belichick figures the Bills will be dumb enough to give them pick 10 if he promises them his top 3rd rounder & sends Gillislee back. He's even willing to let us keep their 5th rounder. Whaley is considering the offer.
Understand... but trading down could yield 1-2 extra picks and fill more needs.
There isn't any huge drop after #10. I can't separate the so called #7 player from #32 this year.
Agreed but it depends if there is a stud available at 10 that fills a huge need. We can certainly trade down and still get a good WR but if we want to go LB or DB, I'd stay at 10.
Number 10 is the easiest place to trade down from because of the fact that most teams have a top 10 draft board that they look at. If one of their players is there at 10 and we want to trade out, we could easily get a desperate team.
Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions
Tweet
Comment