Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind ro

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Wally The Barber
    Registered User
    • Jul 2007
    • 3258

    Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind ro

    Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind roster build

    I'm sure Sean McDermott means it when he says the Buffalo Bills are taking a "50-50" approach to building a roster with short- and long-term decisions.
    There's some hard evidence that supports short-term thinking with the decision to keep Tyrod Taylor at quarterback and hang onto veteran defensive tackle Kyle Williams. The same goes for signing a pair of safeties in free agency -- Micah Hyde and Jordan Poyer -- who can be plugged in as immediate starters.
    There's also ample proof of a long-term vision as well, beginning with that 2018 first-round pick the Bills acquired from their draft-day trade with the Kansas City Chiefs ... and the fact their top three choices this year are likely to start or at least see significant action as rookies ... and the fact they resisted the temptation to restructure big-money contracts and push salary-cap cash down the line that would have extended unwanted commitments ... and the fact they chose not to commit to a fifth year on the contract of a wide receiver, Sammy Watkins, who struggles to stay healthy.
    The reality is that "50-50" is probably more like "60-40," if not "70-30," in favor of a long-term approach.

    Face it. The last thing McDermott is going to come out and say is that the Bills aren't interested in being competitive this year, that it will take at least two and perhaps even three seasons before they're ready to make the jump to being a contender. Or whatever a contender can truly be in the same division as Tom Brady and the New England Patriots.
    But McDermott was hired to fix something that was badly broken, and it isn't simply a matter of instilling the discipline and accountability that was sorely lacking under Rex Ryan.
    There are too many spots in need of upgrading and too many bloated salaries belonging to underachievers that have to be kept until dumping them won't have a crippling cap impact to expect rapid improvement. The Bills have said goodbye to half of the players who appeared in at least one game last season, and it's unrealistic to expect the replacements and the incumbents and the new coaches, with their new schemes, to all mesh in one year.
    Does that mean McDermott won't be under any pressure to show positive results quickly? Hardly. Jaded fans and media, with patience worn to a nub by 17 years of futility, won't hesitate to be heard if there's little or no progress shown this season -- or things actually go in reverse.

    "There’s always a pressure from a coach’s standpoint," McDermott acknowledged to reporters last week.
    But …
    "I think most of the coaches out there would feel the pressure to get … the immediate fix, and sometimes that’s a Band-Aid, and I’m not in to," he said. "I’m not really into that approach."
    That's because, by all indications, he doesn't have to be.
    Terry and Kim Pegula have given McDermott the ability to work with the cleanest of slates. They allowed for the overhaul of the player-personnel department, which, along with McDermott, has been in the process of a top-to-bottom cleansing of all that the Bills had been doing that got them in the mess left behind by Doug Whaley and Ryan and other decision-makers.
    The Bills didn't merely put two new faces at the top of their football operation in McDermott and Brandon Beane. They undertook as massive a transition as any they've made in recent memory.
    And the change in direction the Bills are navigating is more like turning around an ocean liner than a subcompact car.
    It will take some time
    .
    Last edited by Wally The Barber; 06-03-2017, 01:57 PM.
    Beware of Sarcasm
  • psubills62
    Legendary Zoner
    • Sep 2008
    • 11295

    #2
    Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

    I mean, obviously the long-term approach of building a winning roster, a winning attitude, a winning team is ideal. It's just an unfortunate situation all-around because I think there would be a lot less pressure if we didn't have this awful playoff-less streak continuing. McDermott deserves the chance to build a team that he believes will succeed in the long run.

    From the little I've seen, this year would be a good one to tank. Multiple good QB prospects potentially entering the draft next year.
    "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
    - Nicholas Cummings

    Comment

    • MitchMurrayDowntown
      Skoobasaurus-Rex
      • Oct 2011
      • 22284

      #3
      Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

      I really like us having 2 - 1st round picks next year.

      Comment

      • Night Train
        Retired - On Several Levels
        • Jul 2005
        • 33117

        #4
        Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

        I'm guessing McDermott/Beane get at least 3-4 years. Both are young and if it's a long term build, Pegula signed off and will probably show restraint this time. On paper, it sure looks like they finally got the right idea and it all now depends on results. Why shouldn't we have a positive outlook this time around ? Screw the past and those that rehash it.
        Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

        Comment

        • YardRat
          Well, lookie here...
          • Dec 2004
          • 86329

          #5
          Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

          I like the approach so far...re-signing some of our own, no knee-jerk long-term contract 'cave-ins' (**cough**Gilmore, Zach Brown and Woods**cough**), a mix of vets (Hyde and Hodges) and youth in free agency...etc. I really think this could be a quicker turn-around than some expect.

          Absolutely no need to tank. Look at hockey for a good example.

          A few seasons ago, Nashville and Buffalo were in pretty similar situations. One tanked...one took a more balanced approach. One still hasn't made the playoffs...one is playing for a Cup. Personally, I prefer the Nashville approach.
          YardRat Wall of Fame
          #56 DARRYL TALLEY
          #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

          Comment

          • SpikedLemonade
            • Jun 2024

            #6
            Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

            Originally posted by YardRat View Post
            I like the approach so far...re-signing some of our own, no knee-jerk long-term contract 'cave-ins' (**cough**Gilmore, Zach Brown and Woods**cough**), a mix of vets (Hyde and Hodges) and youth in free agency...etc. I really think this could be a quicker turn-around than some expect.

            Absolutely no need to tank. Look at hockey for a good example.

            A few seasons ago, Nashville and Buffalo were in pretty similar situations. One tanked...one took a more balanced approach. One still hasn't made the playoffs...one is playing for a Cup. Personally, I prefer the Nashville approach.
            "....but...but...but other NHL teams tanked in the past...."

            Comment

            • GreedoII
              Registered User
              • Aug 2007
              • 1301

              #7
              Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

              Chiefs cutting salary maybe they will actually suck....

              Comment

              • streetkings01
                Registered User
                • Jul 2006
                • 2980

                #8
                Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                Hopefully when the finished product is assembled Brady will be enjoying retirement.
                You can call me streetkings

                Comment

                • SpikedLemonade
                  • Jun 2024

                  #9
                  Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                  Originally posted by streetkings01 View Post
                  Hopefully when the finished product is assembled Brady will be enjoying retirement.
                  It is not Brady.

                  It is the Belly Monster.

                  Comment

                  • kscdogbillsfan1221
                    Registered User
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 5652

                    #10
                    Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                    Originally posted by streetkings01 View Post
                    Hopefully when the finished product is assembled Brady will be enjoying retirement.
                    seeing brady said some **** like 'i wanna play tll i'm 45' it may be around that time.
                    I came.
                    I saw.
                    I conquered.

                    Comment

                    • psubills62
                      Legendary Zoner
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 11295

                      #11
                      Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                      Originally posted by YardRat View Post
                      I like the approach so far...re-signing some of our own, no knee-jerk long-term contract 'cave-ins' (**cough**Gilmore, Zach Brown and Woods**cough**), a mix of vets (Hyde and Hodges) and youth in free agency...etc. I really think this could be a quicker turn-around than some expect.
                      Absolutely no need to tank. Look at hockey for a good example.
                      A few seasons ago, Nashville and Buffalo were in pretty similar situations. One tanked...one took a more balanced approach. One still hasn't made the playoffs...one is playing for a Cup. Personally, I prefer the Nashville approach.
                      I don't follow hockey, but it seems patently different when one player at one position could make the difference between continuing to wallow in the 5-8 win range and becoming a contender. I'm not saying they should tank, though I do think this next draft will have a much better pool of QB's available. And given the pay structure for draftees, it would be incredibly hard to trade up (even with two firsts) when there are potential franchise QB's available.
                      "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
                      - Nicholas Cummings

                      Comment

                      • Mace
                        Haha...yeah you think so ?
                        • Mar 2013
                        • 20315

                        #12
                        Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                        Originally posted by psubills62 View Post
                        I don't follow hockey, but it seems patently different when one player at one position could make the difference between continuing to wallow in the 5-8 win range and becoming a contender. I'm not saying they should tank, though I do think this next draft will have a much better pool of QB's available. And given the pay structure for draftees, it would be incredibly hard to trade up (even with two firsts) when there are potential franchise QB's available.
                        All you have to do is look at Indy and Luck if you think they tanked (I think they were just that bad without The Peyton), or all the supposed franchise QB's teams overdraft every year and how good they are over time, or team draft success rates, to concluded blowing a season hoping to get a magic ticket to contender doesn't make much sense.

                        I never can see wasting a season, another year in the hope of some instant winner ticket that we haven't gotten in yearly drafts of trying to supposedly find elite players, as anything more than silly.

                        Not you, but all the people loving the Sabres tank have been pretty pained by the results, and basically gained nothing but extra years of misery from the purposeful effort. It's comical from time to time when they jump in and then hope the Bills do it.

                        The Tank. Because it always works juuuuussssst like people want it to.

                        Comment

                        • Gibby
                          Registered User
                          • Jun 2006
                          • 18211

                          #13
                          Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                          Ah long term rebuilds, as a Kansas City Royals fan since the time I could talk, I friggen hate this idea. Football and sports in general these days are win now.

                          Comment

                          • HHURRICANE
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2005
                            • 15490

                            #14
                            Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                            Wouldn't it be funny if McDermott pulls off a 4-12 season.

                            If this team doesn't win 8 games this season it will look like an epic fail.

                            Hard to do a rebuild with losers so they can't just tank.

                            Comment

                            • psubills62
                              Legendary Zoner
                              • Sep 2008
                              • 11295

                              #15
                              Re: Vic Carucci's Bills analysis: Much more long-term than short-term thinking behind

                              Originally posted by Mace View Post
                              All you have to do is look at Indy and Luck if you think they tanked (I think they were just that bad without The Peyton), or all the supposed franchise QB's teams overdraft every year and how good they are over time, or team draft success rates, to concluded blowing a season hoping to get a magic ticket to contender doesn't make much sense.
                              I never can see wasting a season, another year in the hope of some instant winner ticket that we haven't gotten in yearly drafts of trying to supposedly find elite players, as anything more than silly.
                              Not you, but all the people loving the Sabres tank have been pretty pained by the results, and basically gained nothing but extra years of misery from the purposeful effort. It's comical from time to time when they jump in and then hope the Bills do it.
                              The Tank. Because it always works juuuuussssst like people want it to.
                              I agree, tanking very often doesn't work out. There are some downsides to it, and it's no guarantee.

                              But let me ask you - haven't the last 17 years basically been wasted? We just waste them losing fewer games. What's the difference in wasting a year winning 8 games and wasting one winning 2-4 games? Difference is a potentially better draft pick. As troubled as Dareus is, he's the highest draft pick we've had in a while and he's still one of the players with the most talent on the team. Anyone who follows football teams would not be surprised at a really bad year when you're trying to rebuild a roster like we are.

                              We have seemed to be stuck in mid-round hell for a long time with our draft picks. We do poorly enough to not make the playoffs, but not poorly enough to be able to pick a player from the elite group of prospects each year. I don't know if that would have been the golden ticket (certainly haven't seen any QB's I'm a big fan of, especially this past year), but I don't think it could really hurt at this point.
                              "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
                              - Nicholas Cummings

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X