Is Ragland Next?

[Mahdi]

I won't be surprised to see Ragland traded to a team better suited to his skill set.

Maybe to SF or Washington...

[Turf]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

I wouldn't be surprised at all at this point.

[k-oneputt]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

Steelers

[djjimkelly]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

Steelers

yeah then he would be an all pro for the next 10 years.

im starting to truly despise this franchise even though i love them so much

[BillsFanCupp38]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

Trade value is virtually zero especially since he hasn't fully come back from injury. A sixth or seventh round at best.

- - - Updated - - -

Trade value is virtually zero especially since he hasn't fully come back from injury. A sixth or seventh round at best.

[stuckincincy]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

Steelers

You got that right.

[GreedoII]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

yes he's next....book it

[Guest]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

Why not?

3-13 Baby!!!!!!

[DraftBoy]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

They absolutely should. You saw some of his instincts on Thursday night on a few occasions when he stopped thinking and let his natural instincts took over. He's not a good fit and maybe you can get a 4th or 5th for him. May as well shoot for getting two picks in every round at this point.

[Thurmal]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

I think I've had about enough of flipping guys for pennies on the dollar. With any type of investment, you're supposed to acquire assets and move them for more than their original purchase price, not the other way around.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

I think I've had about enough of flipping guys for pennies on the dollar. With any type of investment, you're supposed to acquire assets and move them for more than their original purchase price, not the other way around.

Unless you realize that your investment is going to only depreciate, then you move it as fast as possible to avoid losing anymore capital.

[Thurmal]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

Unless you realize that your investment is going to only depreciate, then you move it as fast as possible to avoid losing anymore capital.

True, but you can't panic and sell too quickly either. Ragland has, what, only a couple series of game tape? If he was a 12-year veteran trying to pick up a new system that he never played in, I could see writing him off as a bad fit, but I would think a young guy like that would be able to adapt.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

True, but you can't panic and sell too quickly either. Ragland has, what, only a couple series of game tape? If he was a 12-year veteran trying to pick up a new system that he never played in, I could see writing him off as a bad fit, but I would think a young guy like that would be able to adapt.

Kinda, but its not like he's never played football before. His ability was evaluated extensively at Alabama and there was near universal agreement that he's a player who doesn't have the skillset to work in 43 defensive formation.

Players who are adaptable traditionally are excellent athletes and skills that can transfer from system to system. Ragland isn't either of those. That's not to say he's a bad player, he's just not a good fit in a 43 system. As a 34 ILB where he can just be asked to plug holes and tackle then he'll be good.

[HHURRICANE]

Say "bye-bye" to Reggie Ragland?

Have to believe he's next to go...

[HHURRICANE]

Re: Is Ragland Next?

I won't be surprised to see Ragland traded to a team better suited to his skill set.

Maybe to SF or Washington...

Didn't see ur thread sorry! Hopefully mod will move mine out.