IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

[Skooby]

No chance we make it past game 6 without being 3 games under .500 so plan on Tyrod being benched by then, that's the way this will play out unless there's an injury (then it's immediately).

[Guest]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

3-13

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

I think he'll be benched as soon as they think Peterman is ready. Not a moment sooner.

[YardRat]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

I'd rather be 3 games over, and thankful thank Tyrod is playing adequately, giving Naterman time to settle in and develop.

[Ginger Vitis]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

No chance we make it past game 6 without being 3 games under

So what you re saying is there is no chance the Bills will go at least 2-4 to start the season they will be 1-5 or 0-6

[Skooby]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

So what you re saying is there is no chance the Bills will go at least 2-4 to start the season they will be 1-5 or 0-6

Yes, I forsee a major collapse. The only chance we have to win is our Defense gets set on fire & smothers our opponents, it will not be thanks to Tyrod. Tyrod is like a filler to pretend we have a QB, right now it's Peterman's potential success or zero.

[BertSquirtgum]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

Yes, I forsee a major collapse. The only chance we have to win is our Defense gets set on fire & smothers our opponents, it will not be thanks to Tyrod. Tyrod is like a filler to pretend we have a QB, right now it's Peterman's potential success or zero.

No.

[Goobylal]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

Yes, I forsee a major collapse. The only chance we have to win is our Defense gets set on fire & smothers our opponents, it will not be thanks to Tyrod. Tyrod is like a filler to pretend we have a QB, right now it's Peterman's potential success or zero.

Major collapse...due to what?

[swiper]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

Major collapse...due to what?

Don't question him. He has inside sources. Inside his itty-bitty head.

[Skooby]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

Major collapse...due to what?

Lack of a cohesive squad, it's Frankenstein out there right now trying to put the pieces together. Don't believe the great practice crap and us not tanking, you don't trade away a Duel first pick WR unless you know your not good.

[Skooby]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

Don't question him. He has inside sources. Inside his itty-bitty head.

Hope Peterman starts and we might actually win some games and build on something, Tyrod is a hot mess who won't get better. His first instinct is to run, Nathan's is to hold the ball until the last second and make the best play available. Watch the first game again and see if you can see who he reminds you of.

[Ginger Vitis]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

Watch the first game again and see if you can see who he reminds you of.

Wow Skooby you made that comparison lol and based off one preseason game lol

[OpIv37]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

Yes, I forsee a major collapse. The only chance we have to win is our Defense gets set on fire & smothers our opponents, it will not be thanks to Tyrod. Tyrod is like a filler to pretend we have a QB, right now it's Peterman's potential success or zero.

So, you think that this team is bad enough to go 0-6 or 1-5 with Tyrod, but you want to put Peterman in there?

If the WRs and OL's are bad enough to get to that awful record, Peterman should not see the field. He'll get killed and be permanently shell-shocked by halftime of his first start.

[Joe Fo Sho]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

So, you think that this team is bad enough to go 0-6 or 1-5 with Tyrod, but you want to put Peterman in there?

If the WRs and OL's are bad enough to get to that awful record, Peterman should not see the field.

Maybe it's the QB's fault that the record is so bad. If we don't make the playoffs this year, I don't want to see Tyrod start another game for us.

He'll get killed and be permanently shell-shocked by halftime of his first start.

At some point, you have to assume that not all of these quarterbacks are babies who've never been hit before.

[Skooby]

Re: IMO- As soon as we go 3 games below .500, Tyrod is benched

So, you think that this team is bad enough to go 0-6 or 1-5 with Tyrod, but you want to put Peterman in there?

If the WRs and OL's are bad enough to get to that awful record, Peterman should not see the field. He'll get killed and be permanently shell-shocked by halftime of his first start.

Peterman dealt with blitzes on every play and did just fine, we need to see what he has and not watch Tyrod run around all day. How many scrambling QB's have won a Super Bowl recently ?? How many ever can you remember that have a tendency to leave the pocket instead of waiting until the last moment to throw the ball ??

The answer is none and virtually none, so where are we going with Tyrod ?? Peterman can play & is a gamer who can throw any ball, it's simply a matter of time before that's plain for many to see.