If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
i think he's asking if it's better to have a crappy inconsistent offense that protects the ball as opposed to a consistent productive offense that'll turn the ball over more often. I say what we have now is much better.
You want a QB who is consistently careful with the ball but has enough faith in his outside playmakers to know when he just needs to throw up the 50/50 ball and let the playmaker go get it. Taylor is the first half, but he has shown the willingness to consistent throw those 50/50 balls when his team needs them.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Anything is acceptable if you can make it work. It's working. I'm good with it. I'll be delighted with it if it works against the Pats.
It's surreal to see them actually making a philosophy work within a process. Kind of makes me optimistic going forward about what happens as they draft what/who they want. To me this is a great example of getting the best results out of what you have.
It's perfect for a team that gives up 13.5 pts /game and doesn't have one of the top 5 or 6 QBs.
He keeps showing he can make big plays if you sell out against the run, or waste a LB spying him. Teams have to pick their poison, I understand why they pick Tyrod, but he's making them pay.
Lack of/inconsistent production for protecting the ball/limiting turnovers.
Do you think that is an acceptable trade-off?
I'd take a few interception here and there for Tyrod to be slangin the ball all over the field. In turn, getting 300+ yards every game. These close games are bad for my heart.
The Bills better still be watching all the quarterbacks playing in college this year. If the Bills could draft Saquan Barkley with their first first round pick and a still get a quarterback with their second first round pick. I would be happy with that.
Comment