We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Novacane
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 42348

    We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

    No doubt in my mind Peterman could have done at least what TT did in our 3 wins. The 2 loses are mostly on Tyrods shoulders. I'm so done with him. This is the most boring offense I can remember watching.
  • cookie G
    Registered User
    • Mar 2003
    • 7562

    #2
    Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

    lol

    Comment

    • baalworship
      Registered User
      • May 2003
      • 1641

      #3
      Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

      The problem with this is Peterman is simply an unknown quantity. There is no reason to believe he will be a good starter in the NFL.

      Comment

      • BillsOwnAll
        My IQ Test results came back negative
        • Oct 2002
        • 5502

        #4
        Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

        I agree Baal but the argument is we KNOW how bad Taylor is

        Comment

        • kingJofNYC
          Registered User
          • Sep 2009
          • 5960

          #5
          Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

          Originally posted by Novacane View Post
          No doubt in my mind Peterman could have done at least what TT did in our 3 wins. The 2 loses are mostly on Tyrods shoulders. I'm so done with him. This is the most boring offense I can remember watching.
          No doubt in your delusional little world.

          Our best player is a RB that can't gain more than 3 yards a carry, that's our problem. But somehow the great Nate Peterman will deliver us a great many victories in the years to come.

          Comment

          • baalworship
            Registered User
            • May 2003
            • 1641

            #6
            Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

            Originally posted by BillsOwnAll View Post
            I agree Baal but the argument is we KNOW how bad Taylor is
            Sure, I am fine with playing Peterman. Just saying we can't assume he will be good.

            Comment

            • imbondz
              Democrats are people too
              • Jan 2003
              • 26041

              #7
              Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

              it's exhausting being a Bills fan.
              My faith doesn’t make me perfect, it makes me forgiven.

              Comment

              • Novacane
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 42348

                #8
                Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                Originally posted by baalworship View Post
                The problem with this is Peterman is simply an unknown quantity. There is no reason to believe he will be a good starter in the NFL.


                I've seen enough to know he can be as good as Tyrod.

                Comment

                • baalworship
                  Registered User
                  • May 2003
                  • 1641

                  #9
                  Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                  Originally posted by Novacane View Post
                  I've seen enough to know he can be as good as Tyrod.
                  Sure throw in Peterman. As I said, Tyrod will take them nowhere.

                  Comment

                  • WagonCircler
                    Escaped Convict
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 5876

                    #10
                    Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                    This is a good loss. And there will be more.

                    It removes the temptation to stick with Tyrod next season.

                    Comment

                    • Novacane
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 42348

                      #11
                      Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                      Originally posted by kingJofNYC View Post
                      No doubt in your delusional little world.

                      Our best player is a RB that can't gain more than 3 yards a carry, that's our problem. But somehow the great Nate Peterman will deliver us a great many victories in the years to come.

                      The # 1 Problem is the QB. Based on your dumb comment in the game thread I know you'll blame everyone but him. If only everyone else was better Tyrod wouldn't suck anymore I'll never understand why some hold on defending the **** this franchise has given us at QB till the bitter end. It happened with JP, Edwards, Fitz, EJ etc.

                      Maybe Peterman isn't the answer. My thread should of said we'd be 5-0 without a garbage QB.
                      Last edited by Novacane; 10-08-2017, 03:05 PM.

                      Comment

                      • YardRat
                        Well, lookie here...
                        • Dec 2004
                        • 86155

                        #12
                        Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                        I don't know if we'd be 5-0, but I think the offense would perform better, more consistently.

                        It's just so damn frustrating that Taylor puts the defense in a position to have to perform perfectly, with no margin for error.
                        YardRat Wall of Fame
                        #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                        #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                        Comment

                        • Turf
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 8378

                          #13
                          Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                          I thought the play calling, especially after that punt return was suspect, no it was horrible.
                          Lou Saban: You can get it done, you can get it done. And what’s more, you’ve gotta get it done.

                          Comment

                          • kingJofNYC
                            Registered User
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 5960

                            #14
                            Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                            Originally posted by Novacane View Post
                            The # 1 Problem is the QB. Based on your dumb comment in the game thread I know you'll blame everyone but him. If only everyone else was better Tyrod wouldn't suck anymore I'll never understand why some hold on defending the **** this franchise has given us at QB till the bitter end. It happened with JP, Edwards, Fitz, EJ etc.

                            Maybe Peterman isn't the answer. My thread should of said we'd be 5-0 without a garbage QB.
                            The Number 1 problem is talent, I include QB as part of the problem. I'm not sure what dumb comment you're referencing, but it probably wasn't as dumb as your thread title.

                            It's amazing, everyone expected this team to be absolute trash, they get off to a hot start, and now should be undefeated if they started a rookie QB. Makes all the sense in the world.

                            We all expected this team to stink because we had no talent on offense, and yet Peterman somehow solves that. Hope he does start, will be fun to watch.

                            Our D may be playing well, but the pace of turnovers is unsustainable. We are getting tipped ints, recovering our own fumbles, at some point this going to go the other way and then we'll really see what this team is all about.

                            Comment

                            • Pennywise
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 276

                              #15
                              Re: We'd be 5-0 if Peterman was starter.

                              Originally posted by Turf View Post
                              I thought the play calling, especially after that punt return was suspect, no it was horrible.
                              It was ****ing awful. Not one of those plays called made a damned bit of sense.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X