What's more important, sign McGahee, or sign Winfield?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WG
    Drew and Sam stole all my hair
    • Jul 2002
    • 9450

    What's more important, sign McGahee, or sign Winfield?

    Not that both aren't possible, just curious which you'd choose if it you could only have one and had to make the choice yourself.

    Say you could have either for 5 or 6 years but could only sign one.

    Which one would you sign?

    It's easy for me, but y'all probably know which one I'd run with.
    Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!

    Then let's go to Disneyworld!

    GO BILLS!!!

  • Fairway To Green
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 42371

    #2
    I don't uderstand the question

    Comment

    • LtBillsFan66
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 35553

      #3
      Winfield, in my own biased opinion.

      Comment

      • HenryRules
        • Jul 2002
        • 2757

        #4
        I'd say McGahee ... I don't care for run-stopping abilities in CBs - I think its akin to judging a girl's beauty by her wrists - yeah, they're part of the whole picture, but a very minor part.

        I'd rather get one of the CB's available next year that can lock guys down better (IMO) and get interceptions.

        Comment

        • Throne Logic
          Terry Tate - Outside Linebacker
          • Aug 2002
          • 2052

          #5
          Winfield.

          Reasons (in order of importance):
          1) Winfield is already established as a productive player.
          2) You can never have too many good DBs.
          3) We have too many good RBs.
          4) Winfield has no major injury to recover from.
          5) MaGahee is from Miami, which is bad.
          Still searching for that offensive rhythm.

          Comment

          • Wys Guy
            Drew and Sam stole all my hair
            • Jul 2002
            • 9450

            #6
            Originally posted by HenryRules
            I think its akin to judging a girl's beauty by her wrists - yeah, they're part of the whole picture, but a very minor part.
            Oh sure, so what do you use to judge beauty!

            LMAO

            I use ankles! The thicker the better!

            Actually, it's really nice when the calf flows right into the ankle w/o losing much "ankular girth"! Usually good stock for breedin' purposes...
            Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!

            Then let's go to Disneyworld!

            GO BILLS!!!

            Comment

            • Wys Guy
              Drew and Sam stole all my hair
              • Jul 2002
              • 9450

              #7
              Nice list TL!!
              Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!

              Then let's go to Disneyworld!

              GO BILLS!!!

              Comment

              • Bulldog
                Top Dog
                • Jan 2003
                • 2654

                #8
                Originally posted by Wys Guy


                Oh sure, so what do you use to judge beauty!

                LMAO

                I use ankles! The thicker the better!

                Actually, it's really nice when the calf flows right into the ankle w/o losing much "ankular girth"! Usually good stock for breedin' purposes...

                Yeah, chicks with cankles are hot! Usually, the ever popular double chin is soon to follow!
                I only drink when I'm alone or with others.

                Comment

                • MDFINFAN
                  Registered User
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 1824

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Throne Logic
                  Winfield.

                  Reasons (in order of importance):
                  1) Winfield is already established as a productive player.
                  2) You can never have too many good DBs.
                  3) We have too many good RBs.
                  4) Winfield has no major injury to recover from.
                  5) MaGahee is from Miami, which is bad.
                  Jim Kelly played there too..:stone:

                  Reach for the stars

                  Comment

                  • Winfield_26
                    Administrator
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 107443

                    #10
                    Winfield
                    COMING SOON...
                    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • northernbillfan
                      Hello, I'm Mike and I'm a Bills fan.

                      Administrator Emeritus
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 27551

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Throne Logic
                      Winfield.

                      Reasons (in order of importance):
                      1) Winfield is already established as a productive player.
                      2) You can never have too many good DBs.
                      3) We have too many good RBs.
                      4) Winfield has no major injury to recover from.
                      5) MaGahee is from Miami, which is bad.
                      Well said Throne

                      However I have to question the fact that Henry will be entering a contract year, and we may lose him to the all mighty dollar. It would be nice to be able to have McGahee fill in the void that may be left by Henry.
                      When I die, please don't let my wife sell my camera equipment for what I told her I paid for it.


                      Comment

                      • wbat27
                        Registered User
                        • Apr 2003
                        • 93

                        #12
                        I say sign winfield and move him to safty (next year) then sign another star cb in free agency. Sign Mcgahee too

                        Comment

                        • Ebenezer
                          Give me a minute...
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 73867

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Throne Logic
                          Winfield.

                          Reasons (in order of importance):
                          1) Winfield is already established as a productive player.
                          2) You can never have too many good DBs.
                          3)
                          4) Winfield has no major injury to recover from.
                          3) We have Travis Henry...and he's a cheap cap hit.




                          For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

                          Comment

                          • kgun12
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 11319

                            #14
                            Winfield, but I don't think he is a top 5 guy. ( no inerceptios) top 10 maybe? Under this defense this year the rush is going to cause turnovers, so we should sign him just in case he has a banner year with interceptions.

                            Except for the fact that we wasted our first round pick on him, I don't care if we ever sign him.
                            Retired Air Traffic Controller
                            USAF VETERAN
                            DAV

                            Comment

                            • Ebenezer
                              Give me a minute...
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 73867

                              #15
                              Originally posted by kgun12
                              Except for the fact that we wasted our first round pick on him, I don't care if we ever sign him.
                              I agree!!




                              For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X