Everyone always talks about how fast he was and how we are going to miss his speed, but was he really that fast to begin with? He wasn't that big either at only 5'11 190 lbs so what made him so much better than Josh Reed? Reed is listed at 5'10 208 lbs. But back to the speed issue:
Peerless:
this website has him running a 4.65 40 time coming out of college
"While he lacks great deep speed, he has outstanding quickness and an excellent short area burst, which gives him separation and the ability to avoid the bump. "
that website has him running a 4.65 as well.
this website has him running a 4.56 in the 40 yd dash
Josh Reed:
CNN has him running a 4.49
NFL.com has him running a 4.52
website has Reed running a 4.5
.
.
.
.
Did Peerless improve his speed after he reached the NFL? and if so, can josh do the same? Neither of them on paper appear to be a flat out burner, although peerless has the reputation as one. In fact, Reed on paper should be the better receiver with his route running skills and tackle breaking ability. What was it that made peerless so good?
Peerless:
this website has him running a 4.65 40 time coming out of college
"While he lacks great deep speed, he has outstanding quickness and an excellent short area burst, which gives him separation and the ability to avoid the bump. "
that website has him running a 4.65 as well.
this website has him running a 4.56 in the 40 yd dash
Josh Reed:
CNN has him running a 4.49
NFL.com has him running a 4.52
website has Reed running a 4.5
.
.
.
.
Did Peerless improve his speed after he reached the NFL? and if so, can josh do the same? Neither of them on paper appear to be a flat out burner, although peerless has the reputation as one. In fact, Reed on paper should be the better receiver with his route running skills and tackle breaking ability. What was it that made peerless so good?
Comment