Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swiper
    Legendary Zoner
    • Sep 2010
    • 33105

    Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

    Anyone else see this?

  • sukie
    Seriously?
    • Sep 2012
    • 21533

    #2
    Re: Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

    Don’t understand the sample size… 5 times the bills went when they should all the rest we shouldn’t have?

    Comment

    • swiper
      Legendary Zoner
      • Sep 2010
      • 33105

      #3
      Re: Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

      Comment

      • YardRat
        Well, lookie here...
        • Dec 2004
        • 86315

        #4
        Re: Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

        Doesn't seem like a legit 'study'. There is no benchmark for when a team 'should' go for it on fourth down.



        Buffalo has gone for it 7 times this season on fourth down, what makes the other two attempts (0 for 2, obviously) not part of the data set?
        YardRat Wall of Fame
        #56 DARRYL TALLEY
        #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

        Comment

        • Forward_Lateral
          Registered User
          • Mar 2004
          • 29897

          #5
          Re: Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

          Originally posted by YardRat View Post
          Doesn't seem like a legit 'study'. There is no benchmark for when a team 'should' go for it on fourth down.



          Buffalo has gone for it 7 times this season on fourth down, what makes the other two attempts (0 for 2, obviously) not part of the data set?
          I'm not sure, but I think it only includes times that they SHOULD go for it? I don't exactly know how that's determined. All this data is saying is that McDermott goes for it 100% of the time, when the analytics say that he should.

          Comment

          • OpIv37
            Acid Douching Asswipe
            • Sep 2002
            • 101326

            #6
            Re: Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

            Originally posted by YardRat View Post
            Doesn't seem like a legit 'study'. There is no benchmark for when a team 'should' go for it on fourth down.



            Buffalo has gone for it 7 times this season on fourth down, what makes the other two attempts (0 for 2, obviously) not part of the data set?
            I'm not 100% on this but this is how I think this study goes:

            They have criteria for when going for it on 4th down vs punting or attempting a FG increases a team's chances of winning the game by at least 1%. They're ranking teams based on who actually goes for it in those scenarios vs who kicks/punts.

            The reason we're 5 for 5 instead of 5 for 7 is because, based on their criteria, the 2 4th down attempts where we failed would not have increased our chances of winning. But that's where the problem comes in. There is no objective criteria for when going for it increases the chances of winning, and they didn't really state what criteria they are using.

            I mean, some situations are obvious. If it's 4th and goal from the 2 and a team is losing by 5 with 10 seconds left, obviously going for it is going to increase the odds of winning, because any other option is an automatic loss. But if it's a tie game early in the 3rd and it's 4th and one at midfield, does going for it increase or decrease a team's chance of winning? Does it depend on the makeup of the team? The weather? Being home or away? There's a lot of subjectivity there.
            MiKiDo Facebook
            MiKiDo Website

            Comment

            • swiper
              Legendary Zoner
              • Sep 2010
              • 33105

              #7
              Re: Which teams go for it on 4th down... when they should

              Originally posted by Forward_Lateral View Post
              I'm not sure, but I think it only includes times that they SHOULD go for it? I don't exactly know how that's determined. All this data is saying is that McDermott goes for it 100% of the time, when the analytics say that he should.
              The TWITTER poster says that "it's based on my criteria," so purely subjective.

              Comment

              Working...
              X