Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

[THE END OF ALL DAYS]

Did they call him up again?

[Mace]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

I think he's still there. He's caught a ball last two games, last transaction I can find was that he was elevated on the 24th.

Absolutely do not see the point of dorking around with it.

[YardRat]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

I'm hoping for a big game from Beez tonight and that open up some deeper stuff for Diggs and Davis.

[Goobylal]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

Need to get John Brown more involved. No one has his speed.

[sukie]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

Need to get John Brown more involved. No one has his speed.

McK6 does.


(forget I said that)

[Canadian'eh!]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

Increasingly looking like McD and Beane severely dropped the ball on Hodgins.

Brown and Beasley aren’t coming close to the production he’s had with the Giants.

[Goobylal]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

Increasingly looking like McD and Beane severely dropped the ball on Hodgins.

Brown and Beasley aren’t coming close to the production he’s had with the Giants.

He's their #2 WR. Meanwhile Brown and Bease joined the team late. He'd at best be taking away some of Shakir's targets here.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

He's their #2 WR. Meanwhile Brown and Bease joined the team late. He'd at best be taking away some of Shakir's targets here.

But yet looks like he could of taken some drops away from Davis with the way he’s playing for the Giants. It’s a rare mistake from Beane, but a mistake.

[acehole]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

Increasingly looking like McD and Beane severely dropped the ball on Hodgins.

Brown and Beasley aren’t coming close to the production he’s had with the Giants.

I was a bit miffed on hogekins and Backshear.

Looks like they went for experience over potential.

Best to move on but yea.

- - - Updated - - -

Increasingly looking like McD and Beane severely dropped the ball on Hodgins.

Brown and Beasley aren’t coming close to the production he’s had with the Giants.

I was a bit miffed on hogekins and Backshear.

Looks like they went for experience over potential.

Best to move on but yea.

[Goobylal]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

But yet looks like he could of taken some drops away from Davis with the way he’s playing for the Giants. It’s a rare mistake from Beane, but a mistake.

He was never going to supplant Davis and is producing around the level of McK. It's good for him that he got to go to a team that will use him.

[kgun12]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

This is a dead horse laying in spilled milk.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

He was never going to supplant Davis and is producing around the level of McK. It's good for him that he got to go to a team that will use him.

Correct, you just perfectly illustrated the problem we’re pointing out.

[Goobylal]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

Correct, you just perfectly illustrated the problem we’re pointing out.

The problem...that he wouldn't have seen the field much with the Bills? He's playing by default in NJ because they have no one else. I suspect that after FA, he'll be pushed further down the depth chart.

[YardRat]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

He was never going to supplant Davis and is producing around the level of McK. It's good for him that he got to go to a team that will use him.

Hodgins is completely out-producing McKenzie the last 6 weeks, actually since he first landed with the Giants, and it isn't close at all.

[swiper]

Re: Is Beasley up on the 53 again?

I'm hoping for a big game from Beez tonight and that open up some deeper stuff for Diggs and Davis.

Yep. They put the band back together. Gave Beasley a couple of game to find his sea legs. Tonight it's time to start leaning on the 3 of them.