How I rate yesterday's game (in-depth analysis)

Ð · 09-08-2003, 02:07 PM

Two Thumbs Up!

**The_Philster** · 09-08-2003, 02:17 PM

Originally posted by lordofgun
I give it a 9 out of 10.

Only 9? Where's the missing point? The penalties and the drops by Reed?

**TypicalBill** · 09-08-2003, 02:21 PM

**Halbert** · 09-08-2003, 02:22 PM

I rate it two snaps up.

**Tatonka** · 09-08-2003, 02:22 PM

your rating ability sucks as bad as sam adams.

**AG75** · 09-08-2003, 02:23 PM

Re: How I rate yesterday's game (in-depth analysis)

Originally posted by lordofgun
I give it a 9 out of 10.

Damn, you weren't kidding when you said "in depth". Your about to give Wys a run for his money!!!!

**lordofgun** · 09-08-2003, 02:25 PM

Originally posted by The_Philster
Only 9? Where's the missing point? The penalties and the drops by Reed?

I never give a 10 unless something is PERFECT.

**Philagape** · 09-08-2003, 02:49 PM

After hours of research, using four literary reference books and going through seven drafts, my comprehensive analysis:

It was great.

**Dozerdog** · 09-08-2003, 03:13 PM

Originally posted by lordofgun
I never give a 10 unless something is PERFECT.

Like a Shutout or something like that?

**lordofgun** · 09-08-2003, 03:15 PM

Originally posted by Dozerdog
Like a Shutout or something like that?

Oh please. You'd give Tanya Harding a 10.

**Cntrygal** · 09-09-2003, 06:03 AM

Originally posted by AG75
Damn, you weren't kidding when you said "in depth". Your about to give Wys a run for his money!!!!

WG · 09-09-2003, 11:09 AM

You said "in depth."

Should read "nine" out of "ten."

Shame on you...

**clumping platelets** · 09-09-2003, 11:12 AM

It was WUNDERBAR!

**The_Philster** · 09-09-2003, 05:17 PM

Originally posted by clumping platelets
It was WUNDERBAR!

You took the words right out of my mouth

Comment