OK, I don't usually like to start threads like this but last week there were threads on how Kevin Thomas sucks and some of you even compared him to Chris Watson. I asked for some examples and got, I don't remember every play. So I would like to know why there are two standards for Thomas and Winfield.
Kevin Thomas has been beat some this year and has been ripped apart in here.
Antowan Winfield has been constantly beat this year. His coverage is "average" at best. He was beat consistently yesterday. Yet, when most of you talk about him it's about how the Bills need to give him a contract extension and what a great tackler he is.
Comparing someone to Chris Watson is just wrong. From what I have seen Winfield's coverage compares more to Watson than Thomas.
(No I am not Kevin Thomas or anyone who knows him, I am just sick of people trying to lay blame to someone based on a couple of plays.)
Kevin Thomas has been beat some this year and has been ripped apart in here.
Antowan Winfield has been constantly beat this year. His coverage is "average" at best. He was beat consistently yesterday. Yet, when most of you talk about him it's about how the Bills need to give him a contract extension and what a great tackler he is.
Comparing someone to Chris Watson is just wrong. From what I have seen Winfield's coverage compares more to Watson than Thomas.
(No I am not Kevin Thomas or anyone who knows him, I am just sick of people trying to lay blame to someone based on a couple of plays.)
Comment