PDA

View Full Version : Drew Bledsoe is nothing without Moulds.


BillyGoatGruff
10-08-2003, 07:28 PM
If Moulds is out this Sunday we are in big trouble. I think we are about to find out how much he means to Drew and to this ballclub. I don't see Josh Reed having much of an impact based on his performance thus far. He has had more than enough time to prove himself in my opinion.
shelby
10-08-2003, 07:30 PM
Bobby Shaw
IHateTheDullphins
10-08-2003, 07:31 PM
Sam Aiken
BAM
10-08-2003, 07:33 PM
Clarence Coleman, Antonio Brown. Josh will be fine Gruff. :up:
BillyGoatGruff
10-08-2003, 07:43 PM
They should give Aiken and Coleman a shot. The worst that could happen is they don't produce, which is what Reed is doing .
njsue
10-08-2003, 08:15 PM
Drew will have to get to know his TE mark campbell a little more.:shake:
The Natrix
10-08-2003, 10:43 PM
four words:

Sam Gash Travis Henry
snow1989
10-08-2003, 11:27 PM
two words....offensive line. Of course losing Moulds hurts...but I think Shaw and Co. could get the job done if Drew is given the time
Indy Bills Fan
10-09-2003, 12:24 AM
I wouldn't say he's nothing without Moulds. He may not be as good, but we'll just have to pound the ball. Last year week one vs Jets Henry had 159 yards. And now he has Gash to lead the way.
DIHARD2
10-09-2003, 05:37 AM
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two weeks ago, the Jets surrendered 202 yards rushing in a 17-6 loss to the Dallas Cowboys . New York ranks 31st in the league, allowing 174.0 yards per game on the ground.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GOOooo!!!...BUFFALOOooo!!!!!.....
colin
10-09-2003, 08:11 AM
I get the impression Drew has had some success without moulds.

We should be able to get it done for a couple of games, if we have less penalties we will be much better on O.
The Shadow
10-09-2003, 08:24 AM
Right...I forgot Moulds was on the 1996 New England team that Drew took to the Super Bowl.

I have a hunch Clarence Coleman is going to shine if he gets the chance. It also might mean more screen passes to Henry, which work more often than not for the Bills.

Yes not having Moulds definitely weakens the Buffalo offense, but if the rest of the receivers step it up and HOLD ON TO THE DAMN BALL, then we will be just fine.
stuckincincy
10-09-2003, 08:37 AM
Not that I wouldn't want to have a healthy Moulds, but I'd guess that the Jet's D might suffer a bit of confusion, i.e., who'll the Bills be tossing to? I suspect they'll soften the WR double coverage any pay a bit more attention to the Bill's run game (and you may fairly say, what run game?).

Perhaps a few favorable one-on-ones might occur. :idunno:
Jan Reimers
10-09-2003, 08:38 AM
Give Drew a running game and a little protection, and he will hit Reed, Shaw, Coleman, Campbell, Gash and Henry all day.
justasportsfan
10-09-2003, 08:43 AM
I'm eager to see what Coleman can do. It doesn't matter who's out there. If Drew is given time, he can hit those wr's on the numbers. It's up to them not to drop the balls.
E-Klips
10-09-2003, 01:57 PM
Drew could help matters by getting rid of the ball a bit earlier at times. There are times we like to see him hang in there to make a big play but there are plenty of other times when the big play just isn't there and he still hangs onto the ball.
BillsNick
10-09-2003, 02:07 PM
I want to see Coleman and Brown!!!!!!!
bernielivsey_1
10-09-2003, 02:29 PM
:fartdie: Travis will be the MVP for this game and he will reach 100 yards. :jetsuck:

Garonteed